Search found 8 matches
- 08 Oct 2013 19:54
- Forum: Conworlds & Concultures
- Topic: 2D Conuniverses and beyond
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3179
Re: 2D Conuniverses and beyond
Okay, assuming we aren't using much complicated physics, we have Newton's law of gravitation: m p g = Gm p m s r -(n-1) With G being a constant,g the gravity, m-p the planet's mass, m-s the star's mass and n the number of dimensions in the universe. By simplifying and adapting to a 2D universe we ha...
- 07 Oct 2013 15:31
- Forum: Conworlds & Concultures
- Topic: 2D Conuniverses and beyond
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3179
Re: 2D Conuniverses and beyond
Upon some research on gravital physics I discovered two formulas that didn't rely on volume and thus, could, on theory provide a surface gravity, these are: g = m ÷ r² With every variable being a comparation to Earth's g = ρ p r ÷ ρ t With radius and gravity compared to Earth's, in case it isn't cle...
- 06 Oct 2013 15:40
- Forum: Conworlds & Concultures
- Topic: 2D Conuniverses and beyond
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3179
Re: 2D Conuniverses and beyond
So, we have: - Option #1 - Planifying 3D Elements After some quick research I discovered that there are only 80 elements that have perfectly stable isotopes (H 1 - Pb 82 except Tc 43 and Pm 61 ) and as it was brought up by Lambuzhao before, when converting some elements, some of them might become un...
- 06 Oct 2013 15:17
- Forum: Linguistics & Natlangs
- Topic: Favorite Phoneme!
- Replies: 421
- Views: 67192
Re: Favorite Phoneme!
/q χ/ I suppose
I like them mostly because of how funny it is to laugh with these sounds.
I like them mostly because of how funny it is to laugh with these sounds.
- 06 Oct 2013 15:11
- Forum: Linguistics & Natlangs
- Topic: Macklemore
- Replies: 15
- Views: 4777
Re: Macklemore
In my heavily accented speech, on my native language I say /mɛkoumɔr/ ~ /mɛkoumɔ˞/
In an attempt to say it in English, I'd say /mɛkəlmɔr/ ~ /mɛkəlmɔ˞/
In an attempt to say it in English, I'd say /mɛkəlmɔr/ ~ /mɛkəlmɔ˞/
- 06 Oct 2013 14:44
- Forum: Everything Else
- Topic: What kind of conlanger are you?
- Replies: 195
- Views: 104484
Re: What kind of conlanger are you?
Unfortunately, I am nothing more than a Scrapper, although I'm trying to change - hopefully to a filler :)
- 06 Oct 2013 13:16
- Forum: Conworlds & Concultures
- Topic: Collective Conworld?
- Replies: 31
- Views: 11154
Re: Collective Conworld?
EDIT: Won't have the time, but still, good luck on your project.
- 06 Oct 2013 04:04
- Forum: Conworlds & Concultures
- Topic: 2D Conuniverses and beyond
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3179
2D Conuniverses and beyond
Basically, I want to know if anyone has attempted to do 2D, 4D, 5D, etc. Conuniverses and whether or not anyone wants to try doing one (if it's even possible)? I think a 2D one would be the easiest to do mainly, because it's something that's intuitively conceived by us and can be easily represented ...