Weird Phrases from your Conlangs

[Sankon]

Khalbõ allows some pretty monstrous consonant clusters:

ñaakstrlno zutntt
/ ɲaːkstrlno zutntː/

"I am agreeing with you for her"

äkrämtps zutnl
/ækræmtps zutnl/

"I farm it"

[Ossicone]

Khalbõ allows some pretty monstrous consonant clusters:

ñaakstrlno zutntt
/ ɲaːkstrlno zutntː/

"I am agreeing with you for her"

äkrämtps zutnl
/ækræmtps zutnl/

"I farm it"

Thanks for reminding me about that month I spent looking at Georgian consonant overlap. (j/k)

[Arzemju]

Khalbõ allows some pretty monstrous consonant clusters:

ñaakstrlno zutntt
/ ɲaːkstrlno zutntː/

"I am agreeing with you for her"

äkrämtps zutnl
/ækræmtps zutnl/

"I farm it"

Thanks for reminding me about that month I spent looking at Georgian consonant overlap. (j/k)

Georgian word that begin with 8 consonants, crazy eh?

გვფრცქვნი (gvprtskvni), "you peel us"

[Golahet]

My conlang: PUSH see-1SG.2SG
English: "the proposition that I saw you and/or I see you and/or I will see you is hereby pushed onto the stack"

[InquisitorJL]

My conlang: PUSH see-1SG.2SG
English: "the proposition that I saw you and/or I see you and/or I will see you is hereby pushed onto the stack"

Is this language based around computer architecture?

[Ave94]

Ooh, that would be neat! Instead of having obviative pronouns, you could have a stack on which you could push phrases. And then to refer to different previously pushed phrases you could use swap, peek and pop function words.

[Trailsend]

Ooh, that would be neat! Instead of having obviative pronouns, you could have a stack on which you could push phrases. And then to refer to different previously pushed phrases you could use swap, peek and pop function words.

See: Fith

[Nortaneous]

Hāňheliubľ:

šenšēṣn /ʃenʃeːʂn/ "I see it"
ịħnị̄ʔẹ̄ẹħn /ɯʁnɯːʔɤːːʁn/ "it is general knowledge that it hurts me"
škṣīni /ʃkʂiːni/ "your children"
kmŋhāmŋhā /kmŋ̊æːmŋ̊æː/ "their sheep"

[Golahet]

Is this language based around computer architecture?

No. The language is an unambiguous context-free loglang (and almost deterministically context-free) which may be considered "computerish", but the language, if we exclude the "extras", follows the general rules for natural languages. My conlang has a stack, but while Fith has a stack-based syntax, the stack of my conlang is semantic, the syntax being purely head-initial and not stack-based. A speaker could ignore the stack and speak the rest of the language as a normal language, which isn't possible with Fith (though Shallow Fith emulates it).

[goneriku]

Khalbõ allows some pretty monstrous consonant clusters:

ñaakstrlno zutntt
/ ɲaːkstrlno zutntː/

"I am agreeing with you for her"

äkrämtps zutnl
/ækræmtps zutnl/

"I farm it"

What would this be allophonically though?

[Sankon]

Probably [ɲæːks.tr̩l.no sːutʼ] and [æ.kræmps zut.n̩l].

[goneriku]

I'm seeing boxes.

[Sankon]

Here's some X-SAMPA: [J{:ks.tr=l.no s:ut_>] and [{.kr{amps zut.nl=]

[Arzemju]

Probably [ɲæːks.tr̩l.no sːutʼ] and [æ.kræmps zut.n̩l].

Use firefox and fonts "Code2000" "Code2001" and "Code2002". It will solve the problem, and you will be able to see almost all scripts, even phoenician.

[MrKrov]

That include Ogham?