Inote

A forum for all topics related to constructed languages
User avatar
MrKrov
banned
Posts: 1929
Joined: 12 Aug 2010 02:47
Location: /ai/ > /a:/
Contact:

Re: Inote

Post by MrKrov »

To Pirka: I didn't say he couldn't. I just said it's really freaking weird because it's really freaking atypical. That kinda seemed like an elicitation for such an explanation. Guy²'s example wasn't such an explanation.

Preemptive edit: Damn my slow typing.
User avatar
Pirka
roman
roman
Posts: 907
Joined: 09 Oct 2010 10:18
Location: Seattle

Re: Inote

Post by Pirka »

MrKrov wrote:Guy2's example...
Pardon? Who is that?

Contraiwise, I didn't say that you said it's wrong; however, you implied it.

Wait, why the heck are we talking about this? Sorry for latching onto your words, MrKrov... Let's let Sectori do his thing. And @Sectori, if you have an explanation of your decision for this atypicality, could you share it with us?
User avatar
Sectori
hieroglyphic
hieroglyphic
Posts: 32
Joined: 07 Oct 2010 18:12
Location: Tkaronto

Re: Inote

Post by Sectori »

The explanation is that that is how it is done in Inote. That is how it has always been done since I moved from prefixing to suffixing.
inida elish, er·jīse pan.
sheb olnezī, on zūl kaid
nyer maudem? māzeye gejegura,
ib·zhiyorī aur mādaresh; kep panī weram.
e pel zherokareshī, onyek ne rād:
izholen tekab. yerogim nyer.

(semar pel, i.1-6)
User avatar
Czwartek
sinic
sinic
Posts: 344
Joined: 12 Aug 2010 15:50

Re: Inote

Post by Czwartek »

I don't see the point in criticising Inote because it differs from the trend of natlangs. One of the purposes of conlanging is to be creative, which is something Sectori will have to be in order to create a useful vocabulary with such a limiting phonology and phonological constraints - that's the point I'd be debating, rather than whether the case suffix should come before or after the number suffix.
Post Reply