After playing around with it all day (most of the time spent on making a translation) I've got Oska.
Rules:num tem suk num o seno met fko em seno to em ot fko em y suk en to fko se suk em es en ot mut em y suk seno to seno ot mut em y suk en to fko se suk em es en ot pex em y seno to suk seno ot pex em y suk en to mut se pex em en es em ot pam pa po tem pam pa po met pun tem te o fe xist ka tem kon ka xist ka o nim met fot ef it y nim to it ot fot ef it y kon ka ko to fot ef se ef ka it es ko ot kont y te em en to em ot kont y fe em en to en ot ketik ek y pam em en to kont ek pam fok em pex se suk suk seno es suk en pam em suk en ot kom em en ex to em se en ex es ot fip ef em en to ef en em ot pokta to fok se fip kon es nim ot fast y pam em en to em ot pinto to fast kom se fot ketik pam seno seno es pokta.
to and ot denote definitions of verbs. To denote verb definitions, first state the name of the verb, followed by any number of nicknames for the verb's objects. (Intransitive verbs take one object, transitive take 2, ditransitive 3, and so on). After stating the names, wrap the definition in to-ot. (For example, swim subject to subject moves through water ot).
Similarly tem and met denote noun definitions. The particle 'o' breaks up the constructor definitions. To use an example from my translation, "num tem suk num o seno met" means "A num is either the suk of another num or it's a seno." Think of the constructors like adjectives.
y is a particle that allows you to refer to a defined noun's internal parts when defining verbs rather than referring to the whole thing. For example, "mon y suk em" means "em" is referring to whatever our verb's object is a "suk" of.
Now, as for the translation itself. You're probably wondering what it says. Actually I just gave you everything you need to know. Figure it out like a real man.
Spoiler: