WI: Late PIE develops postpositions
-
- rupestrian
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 23 Feb 2015 21:18
WI: Late PIE develops postpositions
Assume that late PIE for a reason unknown switched from prepositions to postpositions (it it even possible?) and all daughter families continue this trend.
Would the nominal declension system become more stable? It's likely for this reason that Uralic languages don't really lose cases - when they are weakened by phonetic changes, they can be reinforced by a postposition.
Would the nominal declension system become more stable? It's likely for this reason that Uralic languages don't really lose cases - when they are weakened by phonetic changes, they can be reinforced by a postposition.
Re: WI: Late PIE develops postpositions
Late PIE did have postpositions, didn't it? It's why so many IE languages have 'prepositions' fossilised as prefixes on the verbs - they were put there when it was SOV, when they were just following the object. SOpV > SpVO.
Re: WI: Late PIE develops postpositions
PIE did indeed have postpositions.
We can see survivors in, e.g., Latin -que (PIE -kwe) and -ve (PIE -we) and the variable -cum (PIE kom), the last of which even survives in Spanish conmigo < L. cum mecum. Hittite has postpositions as well (e.g., -ku < -kwe). Greek preserved PIE -de, and. Germanic seems to have had at least -kwe, which seems to be a survivor into English "though" < Gmc. thau + -hw.
We can see survivors in, e.g., Latin -que (PIE -kwe) and -ve (PIE -we) and the variable -cum (PIE kom), the last of which even survives in Spanish conmigo < L. cum mecum. Hittite has postpositions as well (e.g., -ku < -kwe). Greek preserved PIE -de, and. Germanic seems to have had at least -kwe, which seems to be a survivor into English "though" < Gmc. thau + -hw.
-
- rupestrian
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 23 Feb 2015 21:18
Re: WI: Late PIE develops postpositions
BUt what if they actually survived in daughter branches of PIE and became predominant over prepositions? Could they then supplant the disappearing case forms?
So in Latin you would have
Marcus patrum libris dat > Marcos da libru patre a *(instead of "a patre"
Marcus mihi librum patris dat > Marcos mi da libru patre de (not "de patre")
Ovis equusque > ovis equus et
So in Latin you would have
Marcus patrum libris dat > Marcos da libru patre a *(instead of "a patre"
Marcus mihi librum patris dat > Marcos mi da libru patre de (not "de patre")
Ovis equusque > ovis equus et
Re: WI: Late PIE develops postpositions
Hindi uses postpositions which I think are new developments and not just inherited from Sanskrit case markers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindustan ... tpositions
there's a suggestion that they might have once been prepositions, but thats just a wild guess ... i havent looked into it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindustan ... tpositions
there's a suggestion that they might have once been prepositions, but thats just a wild guess ... i havent looked into it.
Kavunupupis, šiŋuputata.
When I see you pointing at me, I know I'm in trouble. (Play)
When I see you pointing at me, I know I'm in trouble. (Play)
Re: WI: Late PIE develops postpositions
They could survive, sure. One of my own invented languages (Talarian, a descendant of Aryan (i.e. PIE)) is postposing. I'm not sure several postpositions that govern a single case would somehow supplant the case marker itself. Unless you're proposing that any given primitive case becomes divided into perhaps half a dozen new cases of which the postpositions simply become the new case markers?Lothar von Trotha wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020 00:54 BUt what if they actually survived in daughter branches of PIE and became predominant over prepositions? Could they then supplant the disappearing case forms?
Now, with Talarian, just about everything is postposed, from pronouns (pronouns per se and also topic/focus indicators) to postpositions per se (and they themselves can be doubled & preposed) to conjunctions and even other substantive roots.
Not all of these things govern a case, of course. -he (and) is probably one of the most commonly found postpositions, but it can be tacked on to anything. Including itself!
I don't think Talarian as it's now spoken would evolve to supplant case forms: those are still terribly useful. If you strike somebody ffâcâ-ca, with a staff or wand, that's just the bare instrumental -â. -com (with) has only a locative of accompaniment sense. A staff can stand maka-com-he, with me (by which is meant, it's in my hand); but I can't strike somebody ffâcâ-com-ca-he. That's just right out. At best, the post / peripositions amplify and focus the broad sense of the case ending.
Well, -que doesn't govern a case. It's a conjunction. If you use "et", it would just continue as ovis et equus as it's done into the modern languages.So in Latin you would have
Marcus patrum libris dat > Marcos da libru patre a *(instead of "a patre"
Marcus mihi librum patris dat > Marcos mi da libru patre de (not "de patre")
Ovis equusque > ovis equus et
Otherwise, I count about 16 Latin prepositions that govern the accusative and almost as many govern the ablative. Are you suggesting almost 30 new cases be formed? And I'm supposing that the nominative, genitive, and dative (to my knowledge no prepositions ever govern them) would remain as is.
I don't know that the -m of the accusative would necessarily disappear. Me I think I'd probably argue that the new case marker would end up -mad. A medial -m- has much less cause or excuse to disappear than a final -m in Latin!
So you'd have a number of new cases: -mad, -mante, -mapud, -mecircum, -mecontra, -mextra, -min, -minter, -mob, -mper and so forth. All of which would be variations on the accusative. Interesting things will, no doubt, happen as we move into Vulgar Latin & Old French times. OF eventually loses final -d, so petremad might end up perema. Patremecircum might end up perecirque. perementre, peremper.
Eventually, phonological change would wear away some of these. peremin & perema are in danger of coalescing.
I wonder: might -mente gravitate towards the new nominal declension as a form of ablative; or would it remain among the adverbes?
-
- rupestrian
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 23 Feb 2015 21:18
Re: WI: Late PIE develops postpositions
Proto Uralic is reconstructed as having 6 cases. Finnish has 16, Hungarian 22 cases. So the Uralic languages actually add new cases. I wonder if an IE language could do the same if it started with postpositions. I have seen a paper arguing that all PIE cases except for nominative and accusative are actually fossilized postpositions.
Last edited by Lothar von Trotha on 22 Aug 2020 02:39, edited 2 times in total.
Re: WI: Late PIE develops postpositions
Yes, of course. This is where cases come from, and it's happened repeatedly in IE languages (and presumably in pre-PIE, given that PIE has cases). The Tocharian languages lost almost all case, down to just nominative vs accusative (plus a genitive, but even that's apparently heavily rebuilt by analogy), but independently of one another agglutinated postpositions to get back up to nine cases. [arguably some or all of these case endings are actually still clitics, depending on your definitions, but the principle is the same]. Apparently a similar process of agglutination also occured throughout the Indo-Aryan languages, though some of these cases may instead derive from auxiliary verbs.Lothar von Trotha wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020 00:54 BUt what if they actually survived in daughter branches of PIE and became predominant over prepositions? Could they then supplant the disappearing case forms?
elemtilas: it is indeed possible to get 20 or 30 new cases in such a way, yes. More commonly, instead of using a bunch of different prepositions, people start using compound prepositions, and then a common part of the compound gets reanalysed as case.
So, taking English as an example, instead of using the prepositions "in", "without", "atop", "behind", "near" and "for", we could start using the compound prepositions "in(side) of", "out of", "on top of", "at back of", "in reach of" and "for sake of". Then "of" can become a case-marking prefix, and we're left with a single locative case, "of-", governed by the prepositions "side", "out", "top", "back", "reach" and "forsake".
[cases can of course be marked by prefixes in this way just as well as by suffixes, though the latter are more common].
-
- rupestrian
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 23 Feb 2015 21:18
Re: WI: Late PIE develops postpositions
PS DO you you mean a new instrumental/ablative construction,
something like this "
spatha mente (with a sword)
caballo mente (on horseback)
That would be interesting. cheval /ʃə.val/ + ment = chevalement /ʃə.valəmɑ̃/
something like this "
spatha mente (with a sword)
caballo mente (on horseback)
That would be interesting. cheval /ʃə.val/ + ment = chevalement /ʃə.valəmɑ̃/
Re: WI: Late PIE develops postpositions
Cool. Just a matter of time, one supposes, before grammarians catch up to reality...Salmoneus wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020 02:33 it is indeed possible to get 20 or 30 new cases in such a way, yes. More commonly, instead of using a bunch of different prepositions, people start using compound prepositions, and then a common part of the compound gets reanalysed as case.
So, taking English as an example, instead of using the prepositions "in", "without", "atop", "behind", "near" and "for", we could start using the compound prepositions "in(side) of", "out of", "on top of", "at back of", "in reach of" and "for sake of". Then "of" can become a case-marking prefix, and we're left with a single locative case, "of-", governed by the prepositions "side", "out", "top", "back", "reach" and "forsake".
[cases can of course be marked by prefixes in this way just as well as by suffixes, though the latter are more common].
NOM house
POS houses
DAT teddahouse
ACC dahouse
INST widdahouse
LOC innahouse
ABL fremmahouse
UND longsideahouse
TRANSL intooahouse
TERMIN onupddahouse
ILLAT oninnahouse
ADESS downnahouse
SUPL uponahouse
SUPER pontopahouse
DELAT wayyonfremmahouse
ASSOC widdahouse
Re: WI: Late PIE develops postpositions
Sure!Lothar von Trotha wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020 02:39 PS DO you you mean a new instrumental/ablative construction,
something like this "
spatha mente (with a sword)
caballo mente (on horseback)
That would be interesting. cheval /ʃə.val/ + ment = chevalement /ʃə.valəmɑ̃/
- WeepingElf
- greek
- Posts: 531
- Joined: 23 Feb 2016 18:42
- Location: Braunschweig, Germany
- Contact:
Re: WI: Late PIE develops postpositions
None of these are postpositions. They are conjunctions. But as others have said, PIE did have postpositions.elemtilas wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020 00:01 PIE did indeed have postpositions.
We can see survivors in, e.g., Latin -que (PIE -kwe) and -ve (PIE -we) and the variable -cum (PIE kom), the last of which even survives in Spanish conmigo < L. cum mecum. Hittite has postpositions as well (e.g., -ku < -kwe). Greek preserved PIE -de, and. Germanic seems to have had at least -kwe, which seems to be a survivor into English "though" < Gmc. thau + -hw.
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf
My conlang pages
My conlang pages
Re: WI: Late PIE develops postpositions
I was under the understanding that PIE’s adposition class was a subset of its adverbs class which allowed them to function both as prepositions and postpositions
Spoiler:
Re: WI: Late PIE develops postpositions
No doubt, those are conjunctions. And they're postpositional. If you're after particles that behave like "traditional English prepositions", then Hittite is your language, chock full of postpositional goodness: -anda (into), -piran (in front of), -katta (under) and the like.WeepingElf wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020 11:31None of these are postpositions. They are conjunctions. But as others have said, PIE did have postpositions.elemtilas wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020 00:01 PIE did indeed have postpositions.
We can see survivors in, e.g., Latin -que (PIE -kwe) and -ve (PIE -we) and the variable -cum (PIE kom), the last of which even survives in Spanish conmigo < L. cum mecum. Hittite has postpositions as well (e.g., -ku < -kwe). Greek preserved PIE -de, and. Germanic seems to have had at least -kwe, which seems to be a survivor into English "though" < Gmc. thau + -hw.
Or even English. Loads of postpositions. Germany's a long way off. We walked the entire park around. They left a long time ago. The upward shift of tuning schemes...
Re: WI: Late PIE develops postpositions
None of those, with the arguable exception of "off", are postpositions, though.elemtilas wrote: ↑23 Aug 2020 00:20No doubt, those are conjunctions. And they're postpositional. If you're after particles that behave like "traditional English prepositions", then Hittite is your language, chock full of postpositional goodness: -anda (into), -piran (in front of), -katta (under) and the like.WeepingElf wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020 11:31None of these are postpositions. They are conjunctions. But as others have said, PIE did have postpositions.elemtilas wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020 00:01 PIE did indeed have postpositions.
We can see survivors in, e.g., Latin -que (PIE -kwe) and -ve (PIE -we) and the variable -cum (PIE kom), the last of which even survives in Spanish conmigo < L. cum mecum. Hittite has postpositions as well (e.g., -ku < -kwe). Greek preserved PIE -de, and. Germanic seems to have had at least -kwe, which seems to be a survivor into English "though" < Gmc. thau + -hw.
Or even English. Loads of postpositions. Germany's a long way off. We walked the entire park around. They left a long time ago. The upward shift of tuning schemes...
[regarding your earlier list, incidentally: the "the" in "the house" isn't actually an accusative case marker, it marks something called "definiteness" instead]