The CBB

it is also important to remember that:
you don't need a complete grammar for a language to work perfectly...
just as linguistics is not necessary to speak a language,
nor to learn a language,
linguistics is not necessary to build a language...

too cold for me,
and because of my dual 3SDl and French nationality,
there's a risk of double allegiance with Adélie Land...

every conlanger,
once it has learned his conlang,
is the most micro of nations,

made up of the only person,
who speaks the national language,
and deliberates on its behalf...

conlang yourself...

it is true, because the functioning of 3SDL is done in 5 layers: - at the lowest the operands, which allow to produce as strokes, the semantic primitives, - which will be the signs on the second step, - these signs assemble by simple contact to propose meanings, basically words of natural languages ...

the meaning of each sign is indicated by a word in my back translation, even if each inscription in extended Latin doesn't fully respect the real idiograms and is only a theoretical representation of them... not all primitives are available, but that doesn't prevent from producing a theoretical asse...

I don't quite understand your request, my translations are always followed by a gloss, even if it comes in the form of a back-translation for the reasons I'm not a linguist... I have never refused to answer anyone... I don't have the impression that the functiniong of 3SDL is less decipherable than ...

3SDL: ï‬²RcdÅmRRM²°Áµz²mo°6²°z°³7yÅ (plant of 10 meters cut by blows of tool of man whose acting seen giving laugh...) This is gibberish to everyone except possibly yourself, making it tantamount to trolling. If you want to present your language, you do it in a way that is understandable and pars...

3SDL:
ï‬²RcdÅmRRM²°Áµz²mo°6²°z°³7yÅ
(plant of 10 meters cut by blows of tool of man whose acting seen giving laugh...)

reality … (snipped to save space) … No. Some people think entirely in pictures, not words. [/size]Citation please??? Maybe Eldin's thinking about people like Temple Grandin? Exactly, @Khemehekis! (Also @HolyHandGrenade.) And at the other end of the spectrum is aphantasia. Aphantastics think entirel...

Please provide glossing that makes it possible for others to linguistically parse your translation. I haven't mastered the technique, and for a conlang(er) for whom only the semantics matter, it's much less useful than back translations... but you can probably produce one, based on these back trans...

why is it terrible...
how is it loglang...

simplifying is pruning...
you can remove a whole bunch of things,
and get a result that's complex to handle...

3SDL
e¹|ª¾i³g¬ªfS
(me not knowing place lived by you...)
+p^r_pčā
(me living at my place...)

I don't know enough about ithkuil, but shifts in meaning that lead to an original etymology can only exist with intense use of the language, as is the case in natural languages, and I don't think we're there with ithkuil, as with the vast majority of conlangs, including those that do diachrony, but ...

shouldn't it be Capo Verde....

3SDL
vɄº½uËzºí¾\\@¼ºÎm\vÉ\\@¼ºn¼w¾
(your words given to network and not seen only by you and seen by all men...)

3SDL
zÍ}¾Îke`zÀ¾Òe
(you have to not doing this and have to not be heard...)

HolyHandGrenade! wrote: ↑03 Jan 2025 15:36 To be fair, englangs and auxlang are known for making big claims.

is that, despite their results, they have a goal beyond the real...
if you're looking for naturalist features, you'll be disappointed...