Because that's just what I felt like doing when I threw this together ages ago. Why does it matter? There's no "naturalism" requirement in this thread, but even if there were, this is hardly the most "unrealistic" thing that's been posted here.Anonymous999 wrote: ↑02 Jan 2023 00:47 Why are /b v/ taking precedence and /p f/ being omitted? I think there is no language where there are no /p f~ɸ but there are /b v~β/.
/p b t̪ d̪ t d ʈ ɖ k g ʔ/ <p b ṯ ḏ t d ṭ ḍ k g q>
/f θ s ʂ x χ/ <f ẕ z ẓ x ẋ>
/m n ɳ/ <m n ṇ>
/l j ɰ/ <l y w>
/r/ <r>
/i i̤ ɯ ɯ̤ u ṳ/ <i ih ü üh u uh>
/e e̤ ɤ ɤ̤ o o̤/ <e eh ö öh o oh>
/a a̤/ <a ah>
Aa Bb Dd Ḏḏ Ḍḍ Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Kk Ll Mm Nn Ṇṇ Oo Öö Pp Qq Rr Tt Ṯṯ Ṭṭ Uu Üü Ww Xx Ẋẋ Yy Zz Ẕẕ Ẓẓ
/afɤ̤ riepsɤ ʂo̤tt̪ɤ θo̤nɳṳt̪mo guʔne̤ θoʈi̤ untɤ̤oʂeta̤χi/
<Aföh riepzö ẓohtṯö ẕohnṇuhṯmo guqneh ẕoṭih untöhoẓetahẋi.>
Next:
/p b t d ʈ ɖ c ɟ k/
/f v s z ʂ ʐ x ɣ/
/m n ɳ ɲ ŋ/
/l j w/
/r/
/i iː y yː ɯ ɯː u uː/
/e eː o oː/
/a aː/