Congratulations!Evni Öpiu-sä wrote: ↑03 Sep 2022 15:16 I've started and abandoned dozens of conlangs but now I finally have one with over a hundred lemmas: Mookré.
Please don't scrap Mookré.
Congratulations!Evni Öpiu-sä wrote: ↑03 Sep 2022 15:16 I've started and abandoned dozens of conlangs but now I finally have one with over a hundred lemmas: Mookré.
Are you a scrapper? Or maybe a sandboxer?
WOO-HOO!
Scrapper/filler/misplacer. I feel like there should be another category for people who keep working on a conlang to the point where it's pretty good, then realize that they did something "wrong" and start a new one, only to later learn that that conlang was fine after all.
Hmmm . . . interesting. What would one call that category? Wrongful executioner?Üdj wrote: ↑01 Dec 2022 19:11Scrapper/filler/misplacer. I feel like there should be another category for people who keep working on a conlang to the point where it's pretty good, then realize that they did something "wrong" and start a new one, only to later learn that that conlang was fine after all.
How about “repentant executioner”?Khemehekis wrote: ↑02 Dec 2022 13:01Hmmm . . . interesting. What would one call that category? Wrongful executioner?Üdj wrote: ↑01 Dec 2022 19:11
Scrapper/filler/misplacer. I feel like there should be another category for people who keep working on a conlang to the point where it's pretty good, then realize that they did something "wrong" and start a new one, only to later learn that that conlang was fine after all.
"Repentant executioner" gets only 221 Google hits.eldin raigmore wrote: ↑30 Dec 2022 17:35How about “repentant executioner”?Khemehekis wrote: ↑02 Dec 2022 13:01Hmmm . . . interesting. What would one call that category? Wrongful executioner?Üdj wrote: ↑01 Dec 2022 19:11
Scrapper/filler/misplacer. I feel like there should be another category for people who keep working on a conlang to the point where it's pretty good, then realize that they did something "wrong" and start a new one, only to later learn that that conlang was fine after all.
Thank you Khemehekis! I came up with a cool system of designing my words and its all been by hand so its taking some time.Khemehekis wrote: ↑31 Dec 2022 09:14"Repentant executioner" gets only 221 Google hits.eldin raigmore wrote: ↑30 Dec 2022 17:35How about “repentant executioner”?Khemehekis wrote: ↑02 Dec 2022 13:01Hmmm . . . interesting. What would one call that category? Wrongful executioner?Üdj wrote: ↑01 Dec 2022 19:11
Scrapper/filler/misplacer. I feel like there should be another category for people who keep working on a conlang to the point where it's pretty good, then realize that they did something "wrong" and start a new one, only to later learn that that conlang was fine after all.
And congrats on that 2,000 milestone, Johnathan!
You're welcome!Johnathan_4 wrote: ↑03 Jan 2023 16:29 Thank you Khemehekis! I came up with a cool system of designing my words and its all been by hand so its taking some time.
If it can be done, you can do it. And we all know you can do it.Khemehekis wrote: ↑04 May 2023 07:47 The clock now starts on a new quota: I will have to reach 85,000 words before May 3, 3024.