West Saxon Grammar Sketch v 0.0.1

A forum for all topics related to constructed languages
User avatar
Herra Ratatoskr
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 98
Joined: 28 Dec 2017 23:22

West Saxon Grammar Sketch v 0.0.1

Post by Herra Ratatoskr »

This is the first part of a sketch of the standard contemporary form of West Saxon (natively <Wessaxisc> /wɛs.ˈæks.ɪʃ/), the conlang spoken in my alt-history version of the Kingdom of Wessex which retained independence from (Norman) England until the late 1600s, and then regained it in the early 20th century.

West Saxon is a West Germanic language descended from the West Saxon dialect of Old English (called Old West Saxon in the alt-history), and is a sister language of English.

These posts will represent my attempt to compile literally years worth of evolving, sometimes contradictory, notes into the bare bones start to a reference grammar. Any feedback, both on the ideas contained within, and on the presentation would be appreciated. Especially useful would be letting me know when things seem confusing, or where you wished I went into more detail. Hope you enjoy!

PHONETIC INVENTORY
Consonants
Standard West Saxon has a total of 33 consonant phonemes. Voicing is contrastive in stops, affricates, and fricatives (except for the lateral fricative / ɬ / and the palatal, velar, and glottal fricatives). The consonant system is summarized in the table below:

Code: Select all

+------------+---------+---------+-----------+-----------+-----------+---------+--------+---------+
|            | LABIAL  | DENTAL  | ALVEOLAR  | POST-ALV  | PALATAL   | VELAR   | UVULAR | GLOTTAL |
+------------+---------+---------+-----------+-----------+-----------+---------+--------+---------+
| STOPS      | / p b / |           / t d /               |           | / k g / |        |         |
+------------+---------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------+--------+---------+
| NASALS     | / m  /  |           / n /                 | / ɲ /     | / ŋ /   |        |         |
+------------+---------+---------+-----------+-----------+-----------+---------+--------+---------+
| AFFRICATES |         |         | / ts dz / | / tʃ dʒ / |           |         |        |         |
+------------+---------+---------+-----------+-----------+-----------+---------+--------+---------+
| FRICATIVES | / f v / | / θ ð / | / s ɬ z / | / ʃ ʒ /   | / ç /     | / x /   |        | / h /   |
+------------+---------+---------+-----------+-----------+-----------+---------+--------+---------+
| LIQUIDS    | / w /   |         | / ɫ /     | / ɹ /     | / j ʎ /   |         | / ʁ̞ /  |         |
+------------+---------+---------+-----------+-----------+-----------+---------+--------+---------+
Monophthongs
Standard West Saxon is quite rich in monophthongs, with a total of 15 in stressed syllables (in the most commonly accepted analysis), as well as three inflectional "schwa" vowels, They distinguish 5 heights, roundedness, and a front-back distinction for tonic vowels. Schwa vowels only distinguish two heights and are all pronounced in the center of the mouth. West Saxon's vowel inventory is as follows:

Code: Select all

+----------+--------+-------+-----------+--------+-------+
|          | F-URND | F-RND | CENTRAL   | B-URND | B-RND |
+----------+--------+-------+-----------+--------+-------+
| HIGH     | / i /  | / y / |           |        | / u / |
+----------+--------+-------+-----------+--------+-------+
| MID HIGH | / ɪ /  | / ʏ / |  / ɨ ʉ /  |        | / ʊ / |
+----------+--------+-------+-----------+--------+-------+
| MID      | / e /  | / ø / |           |        | / o / |
+----------+--------+-------+-----------+--------+-------+
| MID LOW  | / ɛ /  | / œ / | / ə | ɐ / |        | / ɔ / |
+----------+--------+-------+-----------+--------+-------+
| LOW      | / æ /  |       |           | / ɑ /  | / ɒ / |
+----------+--------+-------+-----------+--------+-------+
In addition, there is also a phonemic length distinction, with all vowels having long equivalents. Some use this to justify doubling the count of West Saxon monophthongs to 30, but most instead consider the length to be an allophone of /ɹ/ and /ʁ̞/ before dental, alveolar, and post-alveolar consonants, and of /ð/ before voiced consonants. This can be seen most commonly in alterations found in verbs whose stem ends in <r>. For instance, the verb <werje(n)> (meaning "to protect") has a first person present form <werje>, pronounced /wɛɹi/, but has a first person preterite form of <werde>, pronounced /wɛːd/. Most analyses treat it as having an underlying stem of /wɛɹ-/ in which the final /ɹ/ is realized as /ː/ before the dental suffix.

Diphthongs
Contemporary West Saxon has a large number of diphthongs (15 in total) combining 8 possible onsets and 7 possible codas. Like monophthongs, diphthongs can come in long varieties when followed by a /ɹ/, /ʁ̞/, of /ð/ realized as /ː/. West Saxon’s diphthongs are summarized in the following table.

Code: Select all

+----+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
|    |   -j   |   -w   |   -a   |   -ɥ   |   -ɔ   |   -ɛ   |   -u   |
+----+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| ɪ- | / ɪj / | / ɪw / |        |        |        |        |        |
+----+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| ɛ- | / ɛj / | / ɛw / | / ɛɑ / |        |        |        |        |
+----+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| ɔ- | / ɔj / | / ɔw / | / ɔɑ / |        |        |        |        |
+----+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| œ- |        |        |        | / œɥ / |        |        |        |
+----+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| æ- | / æj / |        |        |        |        |        |        |
+----+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| ɑ- |        | / ɑw / |        |        |        |        |        |
+----+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| j- |        |        |        |        | / jɔ / | / jɛ / | / ju / |
+----+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| w- |        |        |        |        | / wɔ / |        |        |
+----+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
Weak N/R
In quite a few of the coming paradigms there will be either an "n" or an "r" written in parentheses. These letters will sometimes drop off depending on the sounds that follow them, much like the "n" at the end of English’s indefinite article, the final "n" in those German dialects subject to the Eiffler Regel, or the mobile nu of ancient Greek.

In West Saxon, Weak N is dropped when followed by a nasal consonant, /ɫ/, /ɹ/, /ʁ̞ /, or a voiced fricative. Weak R is dropped much more frequently, being dropped whenever the following word begins with a consonant sound of any kind. At the end of an utterance Weak N and Weak R are retained.


Next Time: West Saxon's Orthography
Nachtuil
greek
greek
Posts: 595
Joined: 21 Jul 2016 00:16

Re: West Saxon Grammar Sketch v 0.0.1

Post by Nachtuil »

I am interested to see where this goes. I hope to see an update at some point :) Orthographically I am interested in how you'll go about it and how much you'll derive from historical Old English for everything else. Will the spelling conventions have been "reset" in the last few centuries (like Dutch) or be very historical?
Ælfwine
roman
roman
Posts: 946
Joined: 21 Sep 2015 01:28
Location: New Jersey

Re: West Saxon Grammar Sketch v 0.0.1

Post by Ælfwine »

Playing with a couple myself, I am very much a fan of well made germ-langs.
My Blog

A-posteriori, alternative history nerd
Salmoneus
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3046
Joined: 19 Sep 2011 19:37

Re: West Saxon Grammar Sketch v 0.0.1

Post by Salmoneus »

"v. 0.0.1"

Woah, I've been caught in a time-eddy and transported back to 2005!
User avatar
Herra Ratatoskr
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 98
Joined: 28 Dec 2017 23:22

Re: West Saxon Grammar Sketch v 0.0.1

Post by Herra Ratatoskr »

Should be posting an update soon. I've got the consonants worked out, now I'm trying to figure out how to get the vowels documented. I'm almost there (I think).
Salmoneus wrote: 28 Jul 2018 11:58 "v. 0.0.1"

Woah, I've been caught in a time-eddy and transported back to 2005!
v. 0.0.1 of this grammar sketch. The language itself is probably on v 6.x at this point.
Salmoneus
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3046
Joined: 19 Sep 2011 19:37

Re: West Saxon Grammar Sketch v 0.0.1

Post by Salmoneus »

Herra Ratatoskr wrote: 29 Jul 2018 07:23 Should be posting an update soon. I've got the consonants worked out, now I'm trying to figure out how to get the vowels documented. I'm almost there (I think).
Salmoneus wrote: 28 Jul 2018 11:58 "v. 0.0.1"

Woah, I've been caught in a time-eddy and transported back to 2005!
v. 0.0.1 of this grammar sketch. The language itself is probably on v 6.x at this point.
But,
Spoiler:
if you re-wrote the grammar sketch, surely that would be v. 0.0.1 of itself too? I get how to have version numbers of a language, because a language is a concept that persists through many depictions, but how can you ever have a later version of a specific document? [unless you define documents of a certain type as all being different instantiations of the same platonic document - but since this is 0.0.1, you're clearly not doing that - so what's the difference between two different grammar sketches of west saxon and two very substantially (since '0.0.1 suggests up to three orders of magnitude of difference!) different versions of the 'same' grammar sketch of west saxon?)
Sorry, bad 'philosophy graduate' habit there... but seriously, it's great to see that WS is still going. As I've said before, I've always found it intriguing and fruitful.
User avatar
Egerius
mayan
mayan
Posts: 1588
Joined: 12 Sep 2013 21:29
Location: Not Rodentèrra
Contact:

Re: West Saxon Grammar Sketch v 0.0.1

Post by Egerius »

I'm definitely subscribing.
I saw an older version of this on the ZBB and directly took some inspiration from it for my own Wínlandisch [ˈwæɪ̯nˌlandɪʃ] (Gothic -> “West Saxon” -> “English”), but I'm stuck in between Old and Middle Wínlandisch and didn't pick it back up since 2015 or so…

Anyways, I'd like to see more (particularly stuff on dialects and sound changes)!
Languages of Rodentèrra: Buonavallese, Saselvan Argemontese; Wīlandisċ Taulkeisch; More on the road.
Conlang embryo of TELES: Proto-Avesto-Umbric ~> Proto-Umbric
New blog: http://argentiusbonavalensis.tumblr.com
zyma
korean
korean
Posts: 10432
Joined: 12 Jul 2013 23:09
Location: UTC-04:00

Re: West Saxon Grammar Sketch v 0.0.1

Post by zyma »

Herra Ratatoskr wrote: 21 Jul 2018 00:08 This is the first part of a sketch of the standard contemporary form of West Saxon (natively <Wessaxisc> /wɛs.ˈæks.ɪʃ/), the conlang spoken in my alt-history version of the Kingdom of Wessex which retained independence from (Norman) England until the late 1600s, and then regained it in the early 20th century.

West Saxon is a West Germanic language descended from the West Saxon dialect of Old English (called Old West Saxon in the alt-history), and is a sister language of English.
Looking forward to hearing more about all aspects of this! Was Wessex conquered (not sure if that's exactly the right word) by England similarly to how Scotland was? How did it regain its independence?
Herra Ratatoskr wrote: 21 Jul 2018 00:08 These posts will represent my attempt to compile literally years worth of evolving, sometimes contradictory, notes into the bare bones start to a reference grammar.
I admire your perseverance!
Herra Ratatoskr wrote: 21 Jul 2018 00:08 Standard West Saxon has a total of 33 consonant phonemes. Voicing is contrastive in stops, affricates, and fricatives (except for the lateral fricative / ɬ / and the palatal, velar, and glottal fricatives). The consonant system is summarized in the table below:
If possible, could we see at least some of the sound changes leading up to contemporary West Saxon from Old West Saxon? It'd be interesting to see how some of these consonants became phonemic!

This is nit-picky, but I only count 32 consonants in the chart. Maybe I miscounted?
Herra Ratatoskr wrote: 21 Jul 2018 00:08 Standard West Saxon is quite rich in monophthongs, with a total of 15 in stressed syllables (in the most commonly accepted analysis), as well as three inflectional "schwa" vowels, They distinguish 5 heights, roundedness, and a front-back distinction for tonic vowels. Schwa vowels only distinguish two heights and are all pronounced in the center of the mouth. West Saxon's vowel inventory is as follows:
Sorry to nit-pick again, but while you said that there are 15 monophthongs in stressed syllables and three "schwa" vowels, I count 19 vowels in the chart below. Are there really four "schwa" vowels, /ɨ ʉ ə ɐ/? In either case, what more can you tell us about them?
Herra Ratatoskr wrote: 21 Jul 2018 00:08 In addition, there is also a phonemic length distinction, with all vowels having long equivalents. Some use this to justify doubling the count of West Saxon monophthongs to 30, but most instead consider the length to be an allophone of /ɹ/ and /ʁ̞/ before dental, alveolar, and post-alveolar consonants, and of /ð/ before voiced consonants. This can be seen most commonly in alterations found in verbs whose stem ends in <r>. For instance, the verb <werje(n)> (meaning "to protect") has a first person present form <werje>, pronounced /wɛɹi/, but has a first person preterite form of <werde>, pronounced /wɛːd/. Most analyses treat it as having an underlying stem of /wɛɹ-/ in which the final /ɹ/ is realized as /ː/ before the dental suffix.
All stressed vowels can be long? Because of my experience with German, I'd assumed that length was already part of the distinction between, for example, /i ɪ/. I like that length comes from consonants, though.
Herra Ratatoskr wrote: 21 Jul 2018 00:08 Contemporary West Saxon has a large number of diphthongs (15 in total) combining 8 possible onsets and 7 possible codas. Like monophthongs, diphthongs can come in long varieties when followed by a /ɹ/, /ʁ̞/, of /ð/ realized as /ː/. West Saxon’s diphthongs are summarized in the following table.
There are as many diphthongs as there are stressed vowels? Wow!

For /ɛɑ ɔɑ/, I assume that the low components are non-syllabic?

Also, if I didn't count wrong earlier, is /ɥ/ supposed to be the 33rd consonant above?
Herra Ratatoskr wrote: 21 Jul 2018 00:08 Next Time: West Saxon's Orthography
I really like the look of this language so far!
The user formerly known as "shimobaatar".
(she)
User avatar
Herra Ratatoskr
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 98
Joined: 28 Dec 2017 23:22

Re: West Saxon Grammar Sketch v 0.0.1

Post by Herra Ratatoskr »

First of all, sorry this has taken so long. This has been the most miserable section to write, and it's nowhere near as good as I'd like it to be. I've scrapped and rewritten this a number of times, and feel like I'm giving up on it at this point rather than putting out as polished a product as I'd like. What I'm saying is... tear this apart. Please. I think I've managed to wring everything out of my head onto the page. I just don't know if I've got something comprehensible to other people. Okay, enough pre-emptive apologia, onto the post

ORTHOGRAPHY
Standard West Saxon Orthography is, like its sister language English, a complicated beast. All 26 letters of the Latin alphabet found in English are found in West Saxon, though <q> is only found in loans. In addition, the letters <þ>, <ð>, and <æ> are also used, with <þ> being used intervocally and <ð> used in syllable codas. The use of <æ> is now confined to existing as a variant of <a> used before <sc>, <j>, and <c> when it is representing /tʃ/, and before <j> when part of the diphthong /æj/. For a time <æ>’s use was more widespread, with <a> used for descendents of Old West Saxon short /a/ and <æ> for descendants of Old West Saxon short /æ/ and the short diphthong /æa/ (which merged with /æ/ towards the end of the Old Period). This usage continued for centuries after the two sounds had merged (in most dialects) during the early Middle West Saxon Period.

West Saxon spelling is quite conservative and convoluted, with some spelling conventions dating back over 800 years. As a result, while it is (generally) possible to work out the pronunciation of a word from its spelling, you can't work out its spelling from its pronunciation.

CONSONANTS

Code: Select all

+--------------------+
| STOPS              | 
+----------+---------+
| SPELLING | IPA     | ENVIRONMENT/NOTES/EXAMPLES                                
+----------+---------+
| < p >    | / p /   |  <pinn> /pɪn/ "pin"                                                
+----------+---------+
| < pp >   | / p /   | <clyppen> /ˈkɫʏp.n̩/ "to hold"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < b >    | / b /   | <barn> /bæːn/ "baby"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < bb >   | / b /   | <crabbe> /kʁ̞æb/ "crab"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < p >    | / b /   | following < m >  <camp> /kæmb/ "courtyard/lawn"                               
+----------+---------+
| < dt >   | / t /   | geminate / t / (only found in verbal endings) <riedt> /ɹɪt/ "he/she/it rides"    
+----------+---------+
| < d >    | / t /   | followed by <st> (only found in verbal endings) <riedst> /ɹɪtst/ "thou ridest" 
+----------+---------+
| < t >    | / t /   | <tuon> /tun/ "town"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < tt >   | / t /   | <zitten> /zɪt.n̩/ "to sit"
+----------+---------+
| < d >    | / d /   | <doa> /dɔɑ/ "doe"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < dd >   | / d /   | <bedd> /bɛd/ "bed"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < t >    | / d /   | following < n > <minte> /mɪnd/ "mint"
+----------+---------+
| < c >    | / k /   | <cool> /kɔwɫ/ "cool/chilly"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < ch >   | / k /   | word initially (only found in a few loans) <chor> /kɔʁ̞/ "choir"
+----------+---------+
| < ck >   | / k /   | <buck> /bʊk/ "buck"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < k >    | / k /   | <kyng> /kʏŋ/ "king"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < q >    | / k /   | found only in loans <Iraq> /ɪ.ˈʁ̞æk/ "Iraq"
+----------+---------+
| < g >    | / g /   | <good> /gɔwd/ "good"
+----------+---------+
| < gg >   | / g /   | <vrogge> /vʁ̞ɔg/ "frog"                                                  
+----------+---------+
| < k >    | / g /   | following < n > <zinken> /zɪŋ.gn̩/ "to sink"                                  
+----------+---------+

+--------------------+
| NASALS             |
+----------+---------+
| SPELLING | IPA     | ENVIRONMENT/NOTES                                
+----------+---------+
| < m >    | / m /   | <muos> /mus/ "mouse"
+----------+---------+
| < mb >   | / m /   | when found word finally <lomb> /ɫɔm/ "lamb"                         
+----------+---------+
| < mm >   | / m /   | <hamm> /hæm/ "village"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < n >    | / n /   | <nuo> /nu/ "now"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < nd >   | / n /   | when found word finally <lond> /ɫɔn/ "land"                          
+----------+---------+
| < nn >   | / n /   | <monn> /mɔn/ "man"                                
+----------+---------+
| < nj >   | / ɲ /   | <njod> /ɲɔd/ "need"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < cn >   | / ŋ /   | when found morpheme initially <cnoun> /ŋon/ "to know"             
+----------+---------+
| < gn >   | / ŋ /   | when found morpheme initially <gnaun> /ŋɑwn/ "to gnaw"    
+----------+---------+
| < n >    | / ŋ /   | when followed by < k > or < g >  <zingen> /ˈziŋ.gn̩/ "to sing"
+----------+---------+
| < ng >   | / ŋ /   | when found word finally <rhing> /ɹiŋ/ "ring"                         
+----------+---------+


+--------------------+
| AFFRICATES         |
+----------+---------+
| SPELLING | IPA     | ENVIRONMENT/NOTES                                
+----------+---------+
| < dj >   | / dz /  | <djo> /dzɔ/ "the (FEM.SING.COM)"                                                  
+----------+---------+
| < tj >   | / ts /  | <batje> /bæts/ "I improve"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < c >    | / tʃ /  | followed by <i>/<e>/<æ>/<ue>/<uy> <cælk> /tʃæɫk/ "chalk"                 
+----------+---------+
| < cc >   | / tʃ /  | geminate (i.e. shortening) / tʃ /                
+----------+---------+
| < ch >   | / tʃ /  | <churen> /ˈtʃɔw.ɹn̩/ "they chose"                                               
+----------+---------+
| < cj >   | / dʒ /  | <ecj> /ɛdʒ/ "edge"                                                 
+----------+---------+


+--------------------+
| FRICATIVES         | ENVIRONMENT/NOTES
+----------+---------+
| < f >    | / f /   | adjacent to an unvoiced sound or word initially  <fat> /fæt/ "what"
+----------+---------+
| < ff >   | / f /   | <offrin> /ˈɔf.ɹɨn/ "to offer"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < f >    | / v /   | between voiced sounds <ofer> /ˈɔɑ.vɹ̩/ "over"                            
+----------+---------+
| < v >    | / v /   | <vader> /ˈvɑ.dɹ̩/ "father"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < þþ >   | / θ /   | <moþþe> /mɔθ/ "moth" 
+----------+---------+
| < th >   | / θ /   | found only in loans <therpij> /ˈθɛʁ̞.pi/ "therapy"
+----------+---------+
| < ð >    | / θ /   | when not / ː / or silent <muoð> /muθ/ "mouth"                         
+----------+---------+
| < þ >    | / ð /   | <buoþe> /buð/ "both (NEUT)"                                                  
+----------+---------+
| < ð >    | / ð /   | when between two voiced sounds <halðen> /ˈhæɫ.ðn̩/ "heroes"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < s >    | / s /   | <stoan> /stɔɑn/ "stone" adjacent to a voiceless sound or word finally in non-inflectional syllables                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < ss >   | / s /   | <masse> /mæs/ "(church" mass"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < lh >   | / ɬ /   | <lhoaf> /ɬɔɑf/ "loaf"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < s >    | / z /   | <riesen> /ˈɹi.zn̩/ "to rise" between voiced sounds                            
+----------+---------+
| < z >    | / z /   |  <zoone> /zɔwn/ "soon"                                                
+----------+---------+
| < c >    | / ʃ /   | <benc> /bɛnʃ/ "bench" when following < n >               
+----------+---------+
| < sc >   | / ʃ /   | <scip> /ʃɪp/ "ship"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < sh >   | / ʃ /   | found only in loans <shampoo> /ʃæm.ˈbu/ "shampoo"                             
+----------+---------+
| < zj >   | / ʒ /   | <zjofen> /ˈʒɔɑ.vn̩/ "seven" only found morpheme initially                    
+----------+---------+
| < cj >   | / ʒ /   | <zencjen> /ˈzɛn.ʒn̩/ "to singe" when following < n >                             
+----------+---------+
| < h >    | / ç /   | <zliht> /zɫɪçt/ "slight" when following < i >/< e >                       
+----------+---------+
| < hj >   | / ç /   | <hjo> /çɔ/ "she"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < h >    | / x /   | <douhter> /ˈdox.tɹ̩/  "daughter"                                               
+----------+---------+
| < h >    | / h /   | <helpen> /ˈhɛɫ.pn̩/ "to help" word initially (allophone of / x /)              
+----------+---------+

+--------------------+
| LIQUIDS            |
+----------+---------+
| SPELLING | IPA     | ENVIRONMENT/NOTES                                
+----------+---------+
| < w >    | / w /   | <water> /ˈwɑ.tɹ̩/ "water"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < l >    | / ɫ /   | <ale> /ɑɫ/ "ale"
+----------+---------+
| < ll >   | / ɫ /   | <all> /æɫ/ "all"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < r >    | / ɹ /   | <rieden> /ˈɹi.dn̩/ "to ride"                                              
+----------+---------+
| < rh >   | / ɹ /   | <rhing> /ɹiŋ/ "ring"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < rr >   | / ɹ /   | <ocerren> /ɔ.ˈtʃɛɹ.n̩/ "to turn away/repent"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < j >    | / j /   | <jear> /jɛɑʁ̞/ "year"
+----------+---------+
| < lj >   | / ʎ /   | <liere> /ʎɛɹ/ "boneless cut of meat" also before a diphthong sound with an initial /j/                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < r >    | / ʁ̞  /  | <rund> /ʁ̞ un/ "round" when adjacent to only back vowels                                                  
+----------+---------+
| < rh >   | / ʁ̞  /  | <rhoof> /ʁ̞ɔwf/ when adjacent to only back vowels                                                  
+----------+---------+
| < rr >   | / ʁ̞  /  | <durren> /dʊʁ̞n/ "they dare" when adjacent to only back vowels                              
+----------+---------+
| < wr >   | / ʁ̞  /  | <wrieten> /ˈʁ̞i.tn̩/ "to write"                                                  
+----------+---------+


+----------+---------+
| MISC Characters    |
+----------+---------+
| SPELLING | IPA     | ENVIRONMENT/NOTES                                
+----------+---------+
| < qu >   | / kw /  | <quarter> /ˈkwæː.tɹ̩/ "quarter" found only in loans                              
+----------+---------+
| < x >    | / ks /  | <Wessaxe> /wɛs.ˈæks/ "Wessex"                                                 
+----------+---------+
| < r >    | / ː /   | <berd> /bɛːd/ "beard"                                       
+----------+---------+
| < ð >    | / ː /   | <deaðbedd> /ˈdɛːɑ.bɛd/ "grave" when followed by another voiced consonant        
+----------+---------+
| < ð >    |   -     | <zingeð> /ˈziŋ.gə/ "they sing" word finally after a schwa < e >                 
+----------+---------+
VOWELS
There are three types of vowel graphemes in West Saxon: Short Vowels, Long Vowels, and Diphthongs. These terms are, in a sense, centuries out of date, as all three groups can represent monophthongs and diphthongs depending on its orthographic environment, and the re-introduction of vowel length is a relatively recent development in West Saxon, and applies to all three groups equally. Nevertheless, the groupings are still useful as the members of each group undergo group-specific transformation in orthographic environments that are grammatically significant.

One thing to make sure to remember is that when these descriptions talk about consonants and vowels, it’s speaking orthographically. A doubled consonant counts as two consonants, even though it may be pronounced identically to its single equivalent. A silent final <e> still counts for the purposes of determining if a preceding syllable is considered open, even if the <e> is no longer pronounced.

Short Vowels
By default, a short vowel is usually pronounced as a lax monophthong, and as a diphthong when it is lengthened. A short vowel is lengthened when it appears word finally in a stressed syllable, or if it is followed by a single consonant grapheme followed by another vowel (including a silent final <e>). A short vowel is also realized as lengthened if it is followed by a cluster of <s> and a voiceless stop and then another vowel. Ultimately this goes back to a period when open syllable lengthening was a productive force in West Saxon, where short vowels became long when they didn’t have a coda consonant in their syllable. Due to syllabification rules, the s+stop clusters would be an indivisible part of the following syllable’s onset, assuming there was a vowel to act as a nucleus for the s+stop cluster to glob onto.

In addition to the Lengthened context, the short vowels also Long context which dates to an even earlier time when they were followed by a cluster of a nasal or liquid and a homorganic voiced nasal, liquid, or stop. In most cases these vowels were shortened again, but with a few clusters the length was retained. For non-high vowels the result of this lengthening was identical to the lengthening from being in an open syllable. For the high vowels <i>/<y>/<u>, however, these vowels became either their tense equivalents (if followed by a nasal) or a separate diphthong if followed by an <r>.

A summary of these realizations is in the chart below. The clusters that give a long pronunciation are also given as a reference. N.B. that if a lengthening homorganic cluster is followed by another consonant, then the vowel preceding it is shortened back to its default pronunciation.

Code: Select all

+-----------+---------+------------+--------------+----------+---------------+
| SPELLING  | DEFAULT | LENGTHENED | LONG (NASAL) | LONG (R) | CLUSTERS      | 
+-----------+---------+------------+--------------+----------+---------------+
| < i >     | / ɪ /   | / ɛj /     | / i /        | / (j)ɛ / | (mb,nd,rl,rn) | 
+-----------+---------+------------+--------------+----------+---------------+
| < y >     | / ʏ /   | / œɥ /     | / y /        | / (j)ɔ / | (mb,nd,rl,rn) | 
+-----------+---------+------------+--------------+----------+---------------+
| < u >     | / ʊ /   | / ɔw /     | / u /        | / wɔ /   | (mb,nd,rl,rn) | 
+-----------+---------+------------+--------------+----------+---------------+
| < e >     | / ɛ /   | / ɛɑ /     | / ɛɑ /       |    -     | (nd,ng)       | 
+-----------+---------+------------+--------------+----------+---------------+
| < eo >    | / œ /   | / (j)ɔ /   | / (j)ɔ /     |    -     | (nd,ng)       | 
+-----------+---------+------------+--------------+----------+---------------+
| < o >     | / ɔ /   | / ɔɑ /     | / ɔɑ /       |    -     | (nd,ng)       | 
+-----------+---------+------------+--------------+----------+---------------+
| < a | æ > | / æ /   | / ɑ /      | / ɔɑ /       |    -     | (nd,ng)       | 
+-----------+---------+------------+--------------+----------+---------------+
Long Vowels
The long vowels are the reflexes of long vowels in Old West Saxon, which underwent diphthongization (and later re-monophthongization in some cases).

Earlier, long vowels were shortened when followed by two or consonants (including then geminate consonants), except clusters of s+stop when followed by another vowel. So, for instance, the uninflected form <heast> "violent" is pronounced /hɛst/ with its feminine inflected form <heaste>, pronounced /hɛɑst/.

Earlier in West Saxon, all stressed long vowels underwent diphthongization (including high vowels which usually became /ij/, /yɥ/, and /uw/ and later re-monophthongized). When followed by a nasal consonant, /ɹ/, or /ɫ/, however, the high and mid-high vowels developed a schwa off-glide, much as the mid-low and low long vowels did. The results of these are the nasal colored and r/l colored variants found below.

Code: Select all

+----------+---------+-----------+---------------+-------------+
| SPELLING | DEFAULT | SHORTENED | NASAL COLORED | R/L COLORED |
+----------+---------+-----------+---------------+-------------+
| < ie >   | / i /   | / ɪ /     | / i /         | / (j)ɛ /    | 
+----------+---------+-----------+---------------+-------------+
| < uy >   | / y /   | / ʏ /     | / y /         | / (j)ɔ /    |
+----------+---------+-----------+---------------+-------------+
| < uo >   | / u /   | / ʊ /     | / u /         | / wɔ /      |
+----------+---------+-----------+---------------+-------------+
| < ee >   | / ɛj /  | / ɛ /     | / ɛɑ /        | / ɛɑ /      |
+----------+---------+-----------+---------------+-------------+
| < ue >   | / œɥ /  | / œ /     | / (j)ɔ /      | / (j)ɔ /    |
+----------+---------+-----------+---------------+-------------+
| < oo >   | / ɔw /  | / ɔ /     | / ɔɑ /        | / ɔɑ /      |
+----------+---------+-----------+---------------+-------------+
| < ea >   | / ɛɑ /  | / ɛ /     | / ɛɑ /        | / ɛɑ /      |
+----------+---------+-----------+---------------+-------------+
| < oa >   | / ɔɑ /  | / ɔ /     | / ɔɑ /        | / ɔɑ /      |
+----------+---------+-----------+---------------+-------------+
Realizations above that have a (j) at the beginning trigger palatalization of the preceding consonant if possible and is absorbed by it. So, for instance, the word <huer> "pleasant" is pronounced /çɔʁ̞/

Diphthongs
Original diphthongs "checked" (monophthongized) in similar environments to when long vowels were shortened (except that the s+stop+vowel exception for shorting was no longer in effect).

The <wi> and <we> diphthongs are a bit of an exception to this, as they originally diphthongized off of their original pronunciation of w+vowel when followed by multiple consonants or a single consonant at the end of a word. For instance, the adjective <cwik> "alive" is pronounced /kɔjk/ when uninflected, but in its inflected feminine form <cwike> is pronounced /kwɛjk/ (note the lengthening of /ɪ/ to /ɛj/, as it's in an open syllable). When followed by a nasal, <r> or <l>, <wi> and <we> never undergo any kind of transformation.

Code: Select all

+-----------+--------+---------+
| SPELLING  | OPEN   | CHECKED |
+-----------+--------+---------+
| < ij >    | / ɪj / | / i /   |
+-----------+--------+---------+
| < ei/ej > | / ɛj / | / e /   |
+-----------+--------+---------+
| < ai/aj > | / æj / | / æ /   |
+-----------+--------+---------+
| < iu/iw > | / ɪw / | / y /   |
+-----------+--------+---------+
| < eu/ew > | / ɛw / | / ø /   |
+-----------+--------+---------+
| < au/aw > | / ɑw / | / ɒ /   |
+-----------+--------+---------+
| < uw >    | / ʊw / | / u /   |
+-----------+--------+---------+
| < ou/ow > | / ɔw / | / o /   |
+-----------+--------+---------+
| < wi >    | / wɪ / | / ɔj /  |
+-----------+--------+---------+
| < we >    | / wɛ / | / ɔj /  |
+-----------+--------+---------+
Inflectional / "Schwa" Vowels
These inflectional vowels are (I hope) pretty self explanatory.

Code: Select all

+-----------+-----------+
| SPELLING  | IPA       | NOTES/ENVIRONMENT                              
+-----------+-----------+
| < eð >    | / ə | ɐ / | Predominantly found in verbs                   
+-----------+-----------+
| < e >     |     -     | when word finally                              
+-----------+-----------+
| < es >    | / (ə)z /  |                                                
+-----------+-----------+
| < es >    |   / s /   | following / p /, / t /, / k /, / θ /, or / f / 
+-----------+-----------+
| < i >     |   / ɨ /   |                                                
+-----------+-----------+
| < u >     |   / ʉ /   |                                                
+-----------+-----------+
| < we >    |   / u /   |                                                
+-----------+-----------+
| < je >    |   / i /   |                                                
+-----------+-----------+
| < ij >    |   / i /   |                                                
+-----------+-----------+
| < en >    |   / n̩ /  |                                                
+-----------+-----------+
| < ne >    |   / n̩ /  |                                                
+-----------+-----------+
| < er >    |   / ɹ̩ /  |                                                
+-----------+-----------+
| < re >    |   / ɹ̩ /  |                                                
+-----------+-----------+
| < el >    |   / ɫ̩ /   |                                                
+-----------+-----------+
| < le >    |   / ɫ̩ /   |                                                
+-----------+-----------+
Weak N/R
In quite a few of the coming paradigms there will be either an <n> or an <r> written in parentheses. These letters will sometimes drop off depending on the sounds that follow them, much like the "n" at the end of English’s indefinite article, the final "n" in those German dialects subject to the Eiffler Regel, or the mobile nu of ancient Greek.

In Standard West Saxon, Weak N is dropped when followed by a nasal consonant, /ɫ/, /ɹ/, /ʁ̞ /, or a voiced fricative. Weak R is dropped much more frequently, being dropped whenever the following word begins with a consonant sound of any kind. At the end of an utterance Weak N and Weak R are retained.

Next Time on West Saxon: Nouns.

When will that be? No man can say....

(also, this will be revised when I've gotten some feedback, but I didn't want my dislike of it to hold things up any more)
User avatar
Herra Ratatoskr
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 98
Joined: 28 Dec 2017 23:22

Re: West Saxon Grammar Sketch v 0.0.1

Post by Herra Ratatoskr »

This will be a bit quick. Feel free to ask for any clarification on this stuff.
shimobaatar wrote: 06 Aug 2018 05:02 Looking forward to hearing more about all aspects of this! Was Wessex conquered (not sure if that's exactly the right word) by England similarly to how Scotland was? How did it regain its independence?
The West Saxon king had technically been a vassal of the English king since the early 1300s and in the middle 1600s the West Saxon King was deposed and Wessex integrated into England. There was much outrage at this and the king's son was re-instated as "High Earl of the West Saxons", though technically Wessex was still a part of the Kingdom of Great Britain (think somewhere between Wales and Scotland before the Act of Union, in terms of independence). By the early 1900s nationalism was rising in Wessex and in 1922 the independent kingship was re-established and Wessex regained an independent foreign policy (though it is still has a close relationship with Great Britain).
shimobaatar wrote: 06 Aug 2018 05:02 If possible, could we see at least some of the sound changes leading up to contemporary West Saxon from Old West Saxon? It'd be interesting to see how some of these consonants became phonemic!

This is nit-picky, but I only count 32 consonants in the chart. Maybe I miscounted?
Sound changes will come eventually, but focus on those have kept me occupied for a long while. I'm trying to get other stuff done before I come back to it. And you didn't miscount, I did (whoops).
shimobaatar wrote: 06 Aug 2018 05:02 Sorry to nit-pick again, but while you said that there are 15 monophthongs in stressed syllables and three "schwa" vowels, I count 19 vowels in the chart below. Are there really four "schwa" vowels, /ɨ ʉ ə ɐ/? In either case, what more can you tell us about them?
Sorry for the confusion. The four vowels in the center of the chart are the schwa vowels that don't appear in stressed syllables. /ə/ and /ɐ/ are variants on the same phoneme and are in free variation. I think I handled this poorly, I'll probably find some way to redo this.
shimobaatar wrote: 06 Aug 2018 05:02 All stressed vowels can be long? Because of my experience with German, I'd assumed that length was already part of the distinction between, for example, /i ɪ/. I like that length comes from consonants, though.
Yep, that's a peculiarity of West Saxon. I'm letting it have some weird features, relative to other Germanic languages. Just wait until I get to grammatical animacy and its optional clusivity.
shimobaatar wrote: 06 Aug 2018 05:02 There are as many diphthongs as there are stressed vowels? Wow!

For /ɛɑ ɔɑ/, I assume that the low components are non-syllabic?

Also, if I didn't count wrong earlier, is /ɥ/ supposed to be the 33rd consonant above?
Yep, it's diphthong-tastic. Yeah, the /ɑ/ is non-syllabic (in fact in some environments those diphthongs are realized as /jɑ/ and /wɑ/). /ɥ/ is only found as an off-glide, so that doesn't work as a get-out-of-screwup for my miscount.
shimobaatar wrote: 06 Aug 2018 05:02 I really like the look of this language so far!
Thanks
zyma
korean
korean
Posts: 10432
Joined: 12 Jul 2013 23:09
Location: UTC-04:00

Re: West Saxon Grammar Sketch v 0.0.1

Post by zyma »

Herra Ratatoskr wrote: 17 Aug 2018 02:22 First of all, sorry this has taken so long. This has been the most miserable section to write, and it's nowhere near as good as I'd like it to be. I've scrapped and rewritten this a number of times, and feel like I'm giving up on it at this point rather than putting out as polished a product as I'd like. What I'm saying is... tear this apart. Please. I think I've managed to wring everything out of my head onto the page. I just don't know if I've got something comprehensible to other people. Okay, enough pre-emptive apologia, onto the post
No worries at all! Sorry to hear this has been giving you trouble. I'll do my best to be of some use.
Herra Ratatoskr wrote: 17 Aug 2018 02:22 CONSONANTS
Whoa, there's initial /ŋ/?

There is no example for <cc>, as far as I can tell.

Just to clarify, how is <s> pronounced word-initially?

The example word for <lj> is written as <liere>.

I have to say, I quite like the word for "grave".
Herra Ratatoskr wrote: 17 Aug 2018 02:22 Short Vowels
Regarding the long (r) pronunciations of <i y> and the lengthened/long (nasal) pronunciation of <eo>, what do the parentheses mean, exactly? That is to say, when is the /j/ dropped, and when is it not?

(This was answered below.)
Herra Ratatoskr wrote: 17 Aug 2018 02:22 Earlier, long vowels were shortened when followed by two or consonants (including then geminate consonants), except clusters of s+stop when followed by another vowel. So, for instance, the uninflected form <heast> "violent" is pronounced /hɛst/ with its feminine inflected form <heaste>, pronounced /hɛɑst/.
Not really relevant to the language, but I assume "two or more consonants" was meant?
Herra Ratatoskr wrote: 17 Aug 2018 02:22 Realizations above that have a (j) at the beginning trigger palatalization of the preceding consonant if possible and is absorbed by it. So, for instance, the word <huer> "pleasant" is pronounced /çɔʁ̞/
If palatalization is not possible, what happens? Is a Cj cluster formed, or is the /j/ simply omitted (hence the parentheses)?
Herra Ratatoskr wrote: 17 Aug 2018 02:22 Original diphthongs "checked" (monophthongized) in similar environments to when long vowels were shortened (except that the s+stop+vowel exception for shorting was no longer in effect).
Could you perhaps clarify what you meant by that last parenthetical bit?
Herra Ratatoskr wrote: 17 Aug 2018 02:22 The <wi> and <we> diphthongs are a bit of an exception to this, as they originally diphthongized off of their original pronunciation of w+vowel when followed by multiple consonants or a single consonant at the end of a word. For instance, the adjective <cwik> "alive" is pronounced /kɔjk/ when uninflected, but in its inflected feminine form <cwike> is pronounced /kwɛjk/ (note the lengthening of /ɪ/ to /ɛj/, as it's in an open syllable). When followed by a nasal, <r> or <l>, <wi> and <we> never undergo any kind of transformation.
So, to make sure I understand, when not followed by multiple consonants or a single consonant word-finally, <wi we> were treated as if they were instances of <i e> that just happened to be preceded by <w>, instead of as diphthongs <wi we>?

Herra Ratatoskr wrote: 17 Aug 2018 02:51 This will be a bit quick. Feel free to ask for any clarification on this stuff.
Thanks for your responses.
Herra Ratatoskr wrote: 17 Aug 2018 02:51 Sound changes will come eventually, but focus on those have kept me occupied for a long while. I'm trying to get other stuff done before I come back to it. And you didn't miscount, I did (whoops).
No rush!

Also, in regards to the number of phonemic consonants, in the original post, /h/ is listed as a phoneme, but in the orthography post, it says that [h] is an allophone of /x/.
Herra Ratatoskr wrote: 17 Aug 2018 02:51 Sorry for the confusion. The four vowels in the center of the chart are the schwa vowels that don't appear in stressed syllables. /ə/ and /ɐ/ are variants on the same phoneme and are in free variation. I think I handled this poorly, I'll probably find some way to redo this.
Ah, OK. You could say that the phoneme /ə/ is realized as [ə~ɐ].
Herra Ratatoskr wrote: 17 Aug 2018 02:51 Yep, that's a peculiarity of West Saxon. I'm letting it have some weird features, relative to other Germanic languages. Just wait until I get to grammatical animacy and its optional clusivity.
Definitely looking forward to it!
The user formerly known as "shimobaatar".
(she)
Salmoneus
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3046
Joined: 19 Sep 2011 19:37

Re: West Saxon Grammar Sketch v 0.0.1

Post by Salmoneus »

The orthography section all seems to make sense to me (although it helps that my own english-influenced germanic language has or had many similar rules*).

My stylistic comment is that you sometimes get quite colloquial, and in ways that aren't valid in my dialect (like 'glob on to' and 'diphthongise off of'), but that's a style issue only, so...

So, there's no trisyllabic laxing, then?




*thanks, I think I just solved a problem I've had for ages. The answer is very simple!
Spoiler:
I was torn between using final -e for schwa, and using it as 'silent e' (and presumably using -a or maybe -è for schwa). But of course, I could just use -e as schwa after a double consonant, but as silent e after a single. This means I can't do certain fun things with -e after a double (involving changing syllable boundaries) but that doesn't saddn me too much. I'm not sure I'll do this yet, but it seems the best solution I've found so far...
User avatar
Herra Ratatoskr
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 98
Joined: 28 Dec 2017 23:22

Re: West Saxon Grammar Sketch v 0.0.1

Post by Herra Ratatoskr »

shimobaatar wrote: 17 Aug 2018 05:13 Whoa, there's initial /ŋ/?
Yep. That's actually one of the oldest "oddball" features of West Saxon still in the language.
shimobaatar wrote: 17 Aug 2018 05:13 There is no example for <cc>, as far as I can tell.
Whoops. Here's one <wrecce> /ʁ̞ɛtʃ/ "exile/outlaw/fugitive". I'll add that in a little later.
shimobaatar wrote: 17 Aug 2018 05:13 Just to clarify, how is <s> pronounced word-initially?
As /s/, but it is only found in loanwords (all native words voiced initial /s/ to /z/, except when part of an s+stop cluster). I'll add that too.
shimobaatar wrote: 17 Aug 2018 05:13 The example word for <lj> is written as <liere>.
Also whoops. That part will have to be tweaked to fix that, but until then have <ljornin> /ˈʎɔː.nɨn/ "to learn" as a proper example.
shimobaatar wrote: 17 Aug 2018 05:13 Not really relevant to the language, but I assume "two or more consonants" was meant?
Yep, I'll fix that typo later.
shimobaatar wrote: 17 Aug 2018 05:13 If palatalization is not possible, what happens? Is a Cj cluster formed, or is the /j/ simply omitted (hence the parentheses)?
A Cj cluster is formed. The parentheses is actually to show that sometimes the /j/ is absorbed into the preceding consonant, palatalizing it, and thus not showing up in the surface realization.
shimobaatar wrote: 17 Aug 2018 05:13 Could you perhaps clarify what you meant by that last parenthetical bit?
Yeah, that bit was kind of crap. I'll rework it a bit and get back to you.
shimobaatar wrote: 17 Aug 2018 05:13 So, to make sure I understand, when not followed by multiple consonants or a single consonant word-finally, <wi we> were treated as if they were instances of <i e> that just happened to be preceded by <w>, instead of as diphthongs <wi we>?
The thing is, /wɪ/ and /wɛ/ really wouldn't be considered diphthongs, but a sound change made them become diphthongs under certain circumstances. Maybe it would be better to just explain the etymology behind this, as I realized I forgot to mention one other requirement of this realization. Ok, so round about 1750 in a number of dialects (including Standard West Saxon) /wɛ/ and /wɪ/, when preceded by a consonant (I forgot to mention this stipulation) and followed by a consonant that wasn't /ɫ/ /ɹ/ shifted their stress to the /w/, vocalizing it to /ʊ/, with the following /ɛ/ and /ɪ/ becoming an off-glide. The /ʊ/ then height-harmonized to /ɔ/ before /ɛ/, but a little while later /ɛ/ raised to /j/ (/ɪ/ shifted to /j/ too). So by 1850 you had /ʊj/ and /ɔj/ as realizations of earlier /wɪ/ and /wɛ/. Later, in Standard West Saxon these two merged into /ɔj/, though in some dialects they are still kept separate. Given the complications of surface realization with my orthography, it's kind of tough to write out all the rules in strictly orthographic terms. I love how complicated my orthography has gotten. I hate having to actually describe it.
shimobaatar wrote: 17 Aug 2018 05:13 Also, in regards to the number of phonemic consonants, in the original post, /h/ is listed as a phoneme, but in the orthography post, it says that [h] is an allophone of /x/.
*blinks* D'OH!
shimobaatar wrote: 17 Aug 2018 05:13 Ah, OK. You could say that the phoneme /ə/ is realized as [ə~ɐ].
Yes. That would definitely be a logical way of saying that.
User avatar
Herra Ratatoskr
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 98
Joined: 28 Dec 2017 23:22

Re: West Saxon Grammar Sketch v 0.0.1

Post by Herra Ratatoskr »

Salmoneus wrote: 17 Aug 2018 13:30 The orthography section all seems to make sense to me (although it helps that my own english-influenced germanic language has or had many similar rules*).

My stylistic comment is that you sometimes get quite colloquial, and in ways that aren't valid in my dialect (like 'glob on to' and 'diphthongise off of'), but that's a style issue only, so...

So, there's no trisyllabic laxing, then?
Glad that things are making sense (and I agree with the tone issue; when I have a more final version it will be more formal). There actually is a very limited form of trisyllabic laxing, but it's only when a stressed syllable is followed by two consonants and two other syllables and stopped being productive pretty early on.

And glad to hear that I was of help on your issue.
User avatar
spanick
roman
roman
Posts: 1336
Joined: 11 May 2017 01:47
Location: California

Re: West Saxon Grammar Sketch v 0.0.1

Post by spanick »

Just got around to this. I need to take more time to go through the orthography section. Any updates on grammar? ;)
User avatar
Herra Ratatoskr
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 98
Joined: 28 Dec 2017 23:22

Re: West Saxon Grammar Sketch v 0.0.1

Post by Herra Ratatoskr »

So, the bad news is I got pulled of onto other life things and West Saxon wound up going into a 6+ month hibernation.

The good news is that for the first time ever, coming back to it didn't involve scrapping what I had before and doing it "right" this time. So that's progress (I think). So, here's a very basic sketch (and I emphasize sketch) of how West Saxon nouns work.

NOUNS
Gender and Animacy
The Indo-European masculine/feminine/neuter gender system has survived to the present day in West Saxon, though it has become much more semantic than most other IE languages via the development of grammatical animacy and the simplification and leveling of nominal inflections in the Middle West Saxon period. Unlike in most other Germanic languages (outside those that lack grammatical gender altogether), gender is largely predictable from the semantics of a noun.

Animacy is relevant for a number of reasons in West Saxon, the most important of which are:
  • The possessive case, which only appears with animate nouns.
  • Pluralization rules,
  • Personal pronouns (there are separate animate and inanimate 3rd person pronouns for the masculine, feminine, and neuter genders)
Animate nouns encompass human beings, animals, and supernatural beings, but not plants (so essentially all "sentient" nouns). Nouns referring to animals are generally neuter, except when specifically gendered terms exist for male and female members of a species (i.e. doa "doe" (f) vs buck "buck" (m)). Also, more "personalized" animals, such as characters in fiction or pets, tend to match their gender identity. Neuter is also used to refer to people in the abstract where gender is unknown and/or unimportant, similar to English's tendency to use "they" as a gender-neutral singular. This neuter is also used nowadays as a way to refer to non-binary people. It should be noted that, while the animate neuter pronoun *hit* is cognate with English's "it", it doesn't have the dehumanizing connotation that English "it" would carry.

For inanimate nouns, neuter is used for abstract nouns, while masculine and feminine are used for concrete nouns. The difference between the masculine and feminine inanimates generally conform to the endings of nouns, with masculine inanimates ending in a consonant, while feminine inanimates generally end in a silent "-e", though there are numerous exceptions.

Case and Number
West Saxon nouns contains one major case form, the common case, as well as two marginal cases, the possessive case and the prepositional case. There is also an syntactic objective case, but this is only shown through article agreement.

The singular of the common case is the citation form of a noun, and the plural depends on the nouns animacy, with animate nouns using "-es" to mark the plural, while inanimates use "-en". There are also some irregular nouns, mainly umlauting plurals such as voot/veet (foot/feet), and "-re" plurals like cild/cildre

Null Plurals
In addition to the regular plural, there is also the "null" plural that is identical to the singular, but is semantically plural. The use of this plural is dependent on animacy. For animate nouns, the null plural is a collective and is often used to refer to the noun as a group of its constituents. It has its origin in the neuter animate nouns like deur "deer" that originally had a null plural morpheme. The standard -es plural extended to these nouns, the old plural was retained as a variant and re-analyzed as a collective, and then this usage was spread to all other animate nouns.

For inanimate nouns, on the other hand, the null plural is used when the noun is used with a quantifier and is used to measure something. This usage is similar to English expressions like "he's six foot tall", though in West Saxon the usage is much more generalized.

The Possessive Case
West Saxon, like English, contains a possessive case descended from the older genitive case. Unlike English's possessive, however, there exists a regular plural form of the possessive. Also unlike in English, the West Saxon possessive is a true case and not a clitic, and is only used when the head noun is the final word of its noun phrase. Therefore, phrases like "the Queen of England's crown" would be rendered with a "his" construction, much like in other West Germanic languages.

An additional complication is that the possessive case only appears on animate nouns, while phrases with inanimate nouns typically use a construction with of "of".

The endings of the possessive case are "-es" in the singular and "-ne" in the plural.

Prepositional Case
The prepositional case is generally not used in Contemporary West Saxon, and when it is used it is often used incorrectly. It was still viable in Early Modern West Saxon, and was not "officially" removed from the standard form of the language until the 1920s, though it had been pretty much extinct in spoken West Saxon for at least 50 years at that point. However, one will still see it used in older literature, and is sometimes injected into modern speech to give an archaic feel (though as noted above it is often misused, added to nouns that aren't the object of a preposition).

The prepositional case endings are "-e" in the singular and "-es" in the plural. Therefore, in the plural of most animate nouns the prepositional case will be identical to the common case. In the singular of non-bistem nouns (see below) the prepositional case is generally not phonetically distinct from the common case.

Objective Case
Syntactically, Contemporary West Saxon has an objective case, used as the object of prepositions and as the direct and indirect objects of verbs. There are distinct forms for non-neuter singular pronouns, but no nouns show a morphological objective case in the modern language. The last vestiges of nominal inflection on some feminine nouns that ended in a consonant in the common case made it into the Early Modern Period, but had died out by about 1700. Since then, this case is shown solely by the definite and specific articles, which have distinct objective forms for the masculine and feminine genders.

Monostems vs Bistems
In Contemporary West Saxon, many nouns have a single stem used in all inflected forms and are called, naturally enough, monostem nouns. A sizable portion, however, have two stems and are known as bistem nouns. One stem -- the Short Stem -- contains a short vowel with its default realization, followed by a single orthographic consonant. The other stem -- the Long Stem -- contains the lengthened equivalent of the short stems vowel. The Short Stem is used for the singular of the common case, and the Long Stem is used in the plural of the common case. In animate nouns, the Long Stem is also used with the possessive singular, while the possessive plural uses the Short Stem. Orthographically, the Short Stem and the Long Stem are identical, and the different realizations are shown by the presence or absence of a vowel at the start of its inflectional endings.

An example of an inanimate bistem would be the word for "ship". In the singular it is written as <scip> and is pronounced /ʃɪp/, while its plural form is <scipen>, which is pronounced /ʃɛjpn̩/.

An example of an animate bistem is the word for "fish", <visc>. Its full declension is as follows:

Code: Select all

+-----+-------------------+------------------+
|     | SINGULAR          | PLURAL           |
+-----+-------------------+------------------+
| COM | <visc> /vɪʃ/      | <visces> /vɛjʃəz/ |
+-----+-------------------+------------------+
| POS | <visces> /vɛjʃəz/ | <viscne> /vɪʃn̩/  |
+-----+-------------------+------------------+
With bistems, the long stem is used for the singular and plural of the prepositional case.

And that's it. I'll probably write up some appendices for this covering the irregular plurals, as well as -u/-we stems, another small group of slightly irregular nouns. I'll also throw in rules for borrowed words, particularly those with common Greco-Roman endings. Then probably adjectives, then pronouns & determiners, then verbs. Then I'll probably try to dive a bit deeper into syntax, then... we'll see. And hopefully it won't take until fall to get the next bit out. *crosses fingers*
User avatar
spanick
roman
roman
Posts: 1336
Joined: 11 May 2017 01:47
Location: California

Re: West Saxon Grammar Sketch v 0.0.1

Post by spanick »

Herra Ratatoskr wrote: 15 Apr 2019 00:56 So, the bad news is I got pulled of onto other life things and West Saxon wound up going into a 6+ month hibernation.
No biggie. That's life!


Gender and Animacy
I really like this system.
Animacy is relevant for a number of reasons in West Saxon, the most important of which are:
  • The possessive case, which only appears with animate nouns.
  • Pluralization rules,
  • Personal pronouns (there are separate animate and inanimate 3rd person pronouns for the masculine, feminine, and neuter genders)
So there are six separate 3rd person pronouns? Are these distinguished in the plural as well? Do they have different cases?

The rest all looks great. I really like the monostem/bistem system. Where does this come from? From the couple examples, it kinda looks like short vowels were lengthened in open syllables but that's just a guess.
User avatar
Herra Ratatoskr
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 98
Joined: 28 Dec 2017 23:22

Re: West Saxon Grammar Sketch v 0.0.1

Post by Herra Ratatoskr »

For the pronouns, there is no gender distinction in the plural (that was already gone by the Old West Saxon, i.e. Old English, stage). The inanimates derive from the demonstrative pronoun, and is inspired by - or you could say stolen from - Swedish's system with "han"/"hon" for he/she and "den"/"det" for common and neuter "it". The neuter and plural forms of both animate and inanimate are invariant in regards to case, while the masculine and feminine singulars of both animate and inanimate have common and objective case forms. So that makes *frantically counts till he runs out of fingers* 12 forms? Although there are stressed and unstressed variants for some of them, with the unstressed variants being the most commonly used.

The bistems as described above are purely a product of inflectionally conditioned open syllable lengthening. In regular English these were leveled out to be either long or short in all cases, but I thought it would be fun to keep it around and morphologically productive. There are also what I might call semi-bistems, where the vowel doesn't change, but there is a final fricative that can be either voiced or voiceless (pretty much like your Weddisch, actually). I didn't mention it here as it doesn't have much of a functional load in Contemporary West Saxon, though when the prepositional case was still a thing, there were nouns that semi-bistem pronunciation was important. For instance, the word for "woman" is <wief>, pronounced /wif/. The prepositional case form was <wiefe>, which would have been pronounced /wiv/ (at least between when final schwas dropped off and when the prepositional case died out).

Glad you like!
User avatar
spanick
roman
roman
Posts: 1336
Joined: 11 May 2017 01:47
Location: California

Re: West Saxon Grammar Sketch v 0.0.1

Post by spanick »

Herra Ratatoskr wrote: 16 Apr 2019 05:08 The bistems as described above are purely a product of inflectionally conditioned open syllable lengthening. In regular English these were leveled out to be either long or short in all cases, but I thought it would be fun to keep it around and morphologically productive. There are also what I might call semi-bistems, where the vowel doesn't change, but there is a final fricative that can be either voiced or voiceless (pretty much like your Weddisch, actually). I didn't mention it here as it doesn't have much of a functional load in Contemporary West Saxon, though when the prepositional case was still a thing, there were nouns that semi-bistem pronunciation was important. For instance, the word for "woman" is <wief>, pronounced /wif/. The prepositional case form was <wiefe>, which would have been pronounced /wiv/ (at least between when final schwas dropped off and when the prepositional case died out).

Glad you like!
Ah, very cool. How did West Saxon handle consonants stem umlauts like fot which has fet in the singular dative? Is that retained as a bistem or was the whole singular leveled to fot?
User avatar
Herra Ratatoskr
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 98
Joined: 28 Dec 2017 23:22

Re: West Saxon Grammar Sketch v 0.0.1

Post by Herra Ratatoskr »

By the time Open Syllable lengthening kicked in, the umlaut plurals had already leveled out to having one vowel for each number, so all singular case forms of voot would have "oo" and all plural forms would have "ee".
Post Reply