Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
Mos, an isolate spoken in North Iran. Based on the name, folk belief is that al-Khiḍr was from their ancestors, and the name was given to them by interaction with the Banu Israil, given al-Khiḍr's association with Musa:
/p b ɓ t d ɗ t͡ʃ d͡ʒ k g q/
/m n/
/ θ ð s z ʃ ʒ x ɣ h/
/r/
/l j ʋ/
/i u e o a/
Arabic writing (reversed):
<پ ب بّ ت د دّ چ ج ک گ ق>
<م ن>
<ث ذ س ز ش ژ ح ع ه>
<ر>
<ل ی وْ>
<ي و اِ اُ ا>
/p b ɓ t d ɗ t͡ʃ d͡ʒ k g q/
/m n/
/ θ ð s z ʃ ʒ x ɣ h/
/r/
/l j ʋ/
/i u e o a/
Arabic writing (reversed):
<پ ب بّ ت د دّ چ ج ک گ ق>
<م ن>
<ث ذ س ز ش ژ ح ع ه>
<ر>
<ل ی وْ>
<ي و اِ اُ ا>
Many children make up, or begin to make up, imaginary languages. I have been at it since I could write.
-JRR Tolkien
-JRR Tolkien
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
"Mos" in Crona means BAD. But this is GOOD.
𖥑𖧨𖣫𖦺𖣦𖢋𖤼𖥃𖣔𖣋𖢅𖡹𖡨𖡶𖡦𖡧𖡚𖠨
-
- sinic
- Posts: 401
- Joined: 21 Jul 2012 08:01
- Location: Buffalo, NY
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
So, a concept based on some things I learned about in some recent classes. A while ago I read about tone sandhi, and how in many Sinitic tone sandhi systems, you'll have a thing where every syllable in a syntactic phrase takes the sandhi-tone except for the last, and how each tone essentially has one sandhi form that it switches to when in a sandhi position.
The other day a professor of mine was talking about French stress and how it's phrase-level, with no stress at all except the last syllable in a phrase. And that got me thinking, combine that with a vowel reduction system, and that's almost like a stress-based vowel sandhi system: Every vowel in a phrase takes its reduced form except the last, which bears stress.
So I thought about applying that with this vowel reduction system I thought of a while ago: (S- strong/stressed, W - weak/unstressed/reduced)
So if you had a noun phrase made up of some words like /kaprau̯me do osimula/ it would look like: [kəpromidusimuˈlaː] (with likely contraction of the do and lengthening of the stressed vowel).
Now, that's where the sensible part of the idea ends.
I also had a very silly idea recently of making a languages whose lexicon consisted of just 80-120 CV monosyllables and nothing more. Not an oligosynthetic conlang - there would be homophones, and I would just force the language to deal with it. Oh, and no concatenating morphology. Maybe some genitive phrases like 'X of Y' to reduce ambiguity (proto-compounds, essentially, not yet lexicalized).
Then I thought, oh, what if I combined this with the vowel-reduction sandhi idea? Then I could have whole sentences consisting of nothing but stuff like /ki po ta vai̯ nu lo na nau̯ sa ne/ which gets broken up into maybe two syntactic phrases like: [kiˈpoː | təvenulunənoˈsaː | ˈneː ‖] (no idea what the actual syntactic structure would be there)
But then I remembered this would necessarily be very syntax-heavy, and that I hate syntax (well, kind of). So to at least take some of the burden off of the syntax, I would want some apophonic inflectional morphology. The vowels aren't a very good choice, since a bunch of the contrasts get erased in non-final position. So it must be the consonants. But that would decrease the number of distinct lexical items if I have to dedicate some consonant contrasts to apophonic inflection. So basically I can either abandon the strict CV template, or use a fairly large consonant inventory to ensure I have plenty of possible contrasts for both inflection and the lexicon. This would also detract from the goal of only having 80-120 possible syllables.
I don't really want to use tone, since the whole idea of the vowel sandhi thing was to do a tone thing without tone, but maybe perhaps a prominent lexical category, like person/number on verbs, could bear a floating tone that migrates to the stressed final syllable of the verb phrase. Or is distributed across the verb phrase. If there is a verb phrase? Not all languages have verb phrases. So I don't know. I also thought about maybe introducing phonemic gemination, but I almost feel that would ruin the rapid-fire mumbly rhythm of the language (as I imagine it).
Any other ideas for this crazy scheme are welcome.
The other day a professor of mine was talking about French stress and how it's phrase-level, with no stress at all except the last syllable in a phrase. And that got me thinking, combine that with a vowel reduction system, and that's almost like a stress-based vowel sandhi system: Every vowel in a phrase takes its reduced form except the last, which bears stress.
So I thought about applying that with this vowel reduction system I thought of a while ago: (S- strong/stressed, W - weak/unstressed/reduced)
Code: Select all
S W
i i
e i
a ə
o u
u u
ə ə
aj e
aw o
Now, that's where the sensible part of the idea ends.
I also had a very silly idea recently of making a languages whose lexicon consisted of just 80-120 CV monosyllables and nothing more. Not an oligosynthetic conlang - there would be homophones, and I would just force the language to deal with it. Oh, and no concatenating morphology. Maybe some genitive phrases like 'X of Y' to reduce ambiguity (proto-compounds, essentially, not yet lexicalized).
Then I thought, oh, what if I combined this with the vowel-reduction sandhi idea? Then I could have whole sentences consisting of nothing but stuff like /ki po ta vai̯ nu lo na nau̯ sa ne/ which gets broken up into maybe two syntactic phrases like: [kiˈpoː | təvenulunənoˈsaː | ˈneː ‖] (no idea what the actual syntactic structure would be there)
But then I remembered this would necessarily be very syntax-heavy, and that I hate syntax (well, kind of). So to at least take some of the burden off of the syntax, I would want some apophonic inflectional morphology. The vowels aren't a very good choice, since a bunch of the contrasts get erased in non-final position. So it must be the consonants. But that would decrease the number of distinct lexical items if I have to dedicate some consonant contrasts to apophonic inflection. So basically I can either abandon the strict CV template, or use a fairly large consonant inventory to ensure I have plenty of possible contrasts for both inflection and the lexicon. This would also detract from the goal of only having 80-120 possible syllables.
I don't really want to use tone, since the whole idea of the vowel sandhi thing was to do a tone thing without tone, but maybe perhaps a prominent lexical category, like person/number on verbs, could bear a floating tone that migrates to the stressed final syllable of the verb phrase. Or is distributed across the verb phrase. If there is a verb phrase? Not all languages have verb phrases. So I don't know. I also thought about maybe introducing phonemic gemination, but I almost feel that would ruin the rapid-fire mumbly rhythm of the language (as I imagine it).
Any other ideas for this crazy scheme are welcome.
- Frislander
- mayan
- Posts: 2088
- Joined: 14 May 2016 18:47
- Location: The North
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
/p t t͡s k/
/s h/
/m n ŋ/
/w j/
/i iː o oː/
/eː a aː/
Word-internal consonant clusters are restricted to /s h/ + /p t k/, while word-final consonants are restricted to /k ŋ w/, where /w/ only appears as part of the diphthongs /iw aw/.
/s h/
/m n ŋ/
/w j/
/i iː o oː/
/eː a aː/
Word-internal consonant clusters are restricted to /s h/ + /p t k/, while word-final consonants are restricted to /k ŋ w/, where /w/ only appears as part of the diphthongs /iw aw/.
- Frislander
- mayan
- Posts: 2088
- Joined: 14 May 2016 18:47
- Location: The North
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
/p t k/
/h/
/m n ŋ/
/w/
/i u/
/e o/
/a/
/iu ui eo oe/
/ai au/
Syllable structure is (C)V(K), where onsetless syllables are only found word-initially and K is restricted to word-final /k ŋ/.
/h/
/m n ŋ/
/w/
/i u/
/e o/
/a/
/iu ui eo oe/
/ai au/
Syllable structure is (C)V(K), where onsetless syllables are only found word-initially and K is restricted to word-final /k ŋ/.
- CarsonDaConlanger
- sinic
- Posts: 238
- Joined: 02 Nov 2017 20:55
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
/m n/
/p t d ts tɬ k ʔ/
/ɓ ɗ k'/
/s ɬ x/
/l j w/
/i u/
/e o/
/æ ɑ/
+vowel length
CV(V/R)
R=l,n,m
How realistic do you think this is?
/p t d ts tɬ k ʔ/
/ɓ ɗ k'/
/s ɬ x/
/l j w/
/i u/
/e o/
/æ ɑ/
+vowel length
CV(V/R)
R=l,n,m
How realistic do you think this is?
He/they bisexual weeb
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
I really like the /ɓ ɗ kʼ/ which made me think of Proto-Mayan to begin with (which has /ɓ tʼ kʼ/ and so on, and the singular voiced /d/ reminds me of Finnish.CarsonDaConlanger wrote: ↑10 Apr 2019 23:24 /m n/
/p t d ts tɬ k ʔ/
/ɓ ɗ k'/
/s ɬ x/
/l j w/
/i u/
/e o/
/æ ɑ/
+vowel length
CV(V/R)
R=l,n,m
How realistic do you think this is?
The only thing that's giving me some pause for thought is having /ts tɬ/, /s ɬ/, ejectives, but no /tsʼ tɬʼ/. I can't think of a language off the top of my head that has that sort of gap (where a language lacks /tsʼ tɬʼ/ it tends to lack ejectives entirely, IIRC). I'm sure someone can point out a counterexample, but from what I can tell, affricates tend to pattern as plosives, so they tend to make the same distinctions, e.g. if plosives can be voiced, affricates also tend to have voiceless vs. voiced pairs, if there are ejectives, affricates also tend to have ejective counterparts, and so on.
You can tell the same lie a thousand times,
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
I agree with sangi39 that the lack of /tsʼ tɬʼ/ is fairly unusual in such an inventory, but given your relatively simple syllable structure, this lack is easy to explain with diachronics: Suppose an earlier stage of the language had no glottalized consonants, with only /p t k ʔ/ as voiceless stops, but allowing them in coda position. Then the following sound changes occurred (among others, presumably):
{ps ts ks} {pɬ tɬ kɬ} > ts tɬ
p t k > ʔ / _C, _#
ʔ > zero / _CC (this eliminates any ʔts ʔtɬ clusters; alternatively the outcome could be a preceding long vowel)
ʔp ʔt ʔk > pʼ tʼ kʼ
Vʔ > Vː / except _V
pʼ tʼ > ɓ ɗ
and voilà, you get basically the described phonological distribution.
{ps ts ks} {pɬ tɬ kɬ} > ts tɬ
p t k > ʔ / _C, _#
ʔ > zero / _CC (this eliminates any ʔts ʔtɬ clusters; alternatively the outcome could be a preceding long vowel)
ʔp ʔt ʔk > pʼ tʼ kʼ
Vʔ > Vː / except _V
pʼ tʼ > ɓ ɗ
and voilà, you get basically the described phonological distribution.
Blog: audmanh.wordpress.com
Conlangs: Ronc Tyu | Buruya Nzaysa | Doayâu | Tmaśareʔ
Conlangs: Ronc Tyu | Buruya Nzaysa | Doayâu | Tmaśareʔ
- Frislander
- mayan
- Posts: 2088
- Joined: 14 May 2016 18:47
- Location: The North
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
I think the only place I've seen a language with both ejectives and affricates but no ejective affricates is actually Na‘vi, a conlang. If anything the tendency is the other way round - languages with both ejectives and affricates tend to be more likely to have only ejective affricates than non-ejective ones (see the Salishan family, which universally has /t͡ɬ’/ but almost as universally lacks its non-ejective counterpart), as well as many others such as Sandawe in Africa.
- CarsonDaConlanger
- sinic
- Posts: 238
- Joined: 02 Nov 2017 20:55
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
I've removed /ts/ entirely, and I've got diachronics where older /tɬʼ kxʼ/ > /tʼ kʼ/ > /kʼ kʼ/
He/they bisexual weeb
-
- sinic
- Posts: 401
- Joined: 21 Jul 2012 08:01
- Location: Buffalo, NY
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
/m n ɲ ŋ/
/p t c k ʔ/
/a i u/
Syllable structure is (C)V(C). Nasals assimilate in place to a following consonant, non-nasals assimilate totally to a following consonant. Stops are voiced after nasals, and non-glottal stops are lenited and possibly voiced between stops, maybe something like [ɸ θ ç x] or [β̞ ð̞ j ɰ]. Word-final stops are likely unreleased.
Practically speaking, this means the following segments are contrastive intervocalically:
[m n ɲ ŋ]
[mb nd ɲɟ ŋg]
[pp tt cc kk]
[ɸ θ ç x]
Gemination may also be possibly phonemic, or conditioned at a fairly deep level, due to stress-related phenomena.
There is a process of rightward frontness harmony: After a syllable with /i/, all instances of /u/ become /i/. (The reverse is not the case - in this way, /i/ is "dominant" and /u/ is "recessive".)
There may be remnants of a historical voiced/lenis series - I'm thinking that perhaps a series /b d (ɟ) g/ went to zero postvocalically and merged with the voiceless series word-initially and in geminates, with the distinction only resurfacing in patterns of sandhi or morphological gradation.
The palatal series may be secondary in origin, reflected in synchronic patterns of palatalization. /ŋ/ may also be only recently phonemic from /ng/ clusters; /ʔ/ may also be recently phonemic from lexicalized sandhi effects in compounds or morphology.
/p t c k ʔ/
/a i u/
Syllable structure is (C)V(C). Nasals assimilate in place to a following consonant, non-nasals assimilate totally to a following consonant. Stops are voiced after nasals, and non-glottal stops are lenited and possibly voiced between stops, maybe something like [ɸ θ ç x] or [β̞ ð̞ j ɰ]. Word-final stops are likely unreleased.
Practically speaking, this means the following segments are contrastive intervocalically:
[m n ɲ ŋ]
[mb nd ɲɟ ŋg]
[pp tt cc kk]
[ɸ θ ç x]
Gemination may also be possibly phonemic, or conditioned at a fairly deep level, due to stress-related phenomena.
There is a process of rightward frontness harmony: After a syllable with /i/, all instances of /u/ become /i/. (The reverse is not the case - in this way, /i/ is "dominant" and /u/ is "recessive".)
There may be remnants of a historical voiced/lenis series - I'm thinking that perhaps a series /b d (ɟ) g/ went to zero postvocalically and merged with the voiceless series word-initially and in geminates, with the distinction only resurfacing in patterns of sandhi or morphological gradation.
The palatal series may be secondary in origin, reflected in synchronic patterns of palatalization. /ŋ/ may also be only recently phonemic from /ng/ clusters; /ʔ/ may also be recently phonemic from lexicalized sandhi effects in compounds or morphology.
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
It's not quite a phonology idea, but I've come up with the idea of a descendant of Koine Greek (spoken somewhere in the Middle East) where φ, θ and χ didn't become fricatives.
Instead, there would be a chain shift where π, τ, κ > /b/, /d/, /g/ and φ, θ, χ > /p/, /t/, /k/. A little bit later, β and γ would devoice word-initially becoming [f] and [x] while remaining [v] and [ɣ] word-internally. This is simply a continuation of tendencies already present in Koine Greek (apparently the voiced stops became fricatives earlier than the voiceless aspirated ones, and there was positional voicing of voiceless stops) and would result in some serious obstructions to mutual intelligibility (the mismatch between consonants would be like that between Ancient Greek and Ancient Macedonian), especially if there was some serious vowel reduction as well!
Instead, there would be a chain shift where π, τ, κ > /b/, /d/, /g/ and φ, θ, χ > /p/, /t/, /k/. A little bit later, β and γ would devoice word-initially becoming [f] and [x] while remaining [v] and [ɣ] word-internally. This is simply a continuation of tendencies already present in Koine Greek (apparently the voiced stops became fricatives earlier than the voiceless aspirated ones, and there was positional voicing of voiceless stops) and would result in some serious obstructions to mutual intelligibility (the mismatch between consonants would be like that between Ancient Greek and Ancient Macedonian), especially if there was some serious vowel reduction as well!
Languages:
[:D], [;)], [:D], [:|], [:(], [:'(]
A linguistics enthusiast who occasionally frequents the CBB.
- Guide to Slavic accentuation
[:D], [;)], [:D], [:|], [:(], [:'(]
A linguistics enthusiast who occasionally frequents the CBB.
- Guide to Slavic accentuation
- Creyeditor
- MVP
- Posts: 5091
- Joined: 14 Aug 2012 19:32
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
I really like that idea. Did you already think of other changes? Maybe one could do something nice with the vowels (keeping half of them from becoming /i/)?
Creyeditor
"Thoughts are free."
Produce, Analyze, Manipulate
1 2 3 4 4
Ook & Omlűt & Nautli languages & Sperenjas
Papuan languages, Morphophonology, Lexical Semantics
"Thoughts are free."
Produce, Analyze, Manipulate
1 2 3 4 4
Ook & Omlűt & Nautli languages & Sperenjas
Papuan languages, Morphophonology, Lexical Semantics
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
During the relevant period, only ει and ηι had merged with ι, so you can definitely avoid rampant iotacism. It's likely too late to preserve vowel length, though: the language had stress accent and incipient vowel reduction. With the initial inventory of /i y e ε a o u/ that could lead to some interesting developments (maybe even some sort of consonant mutation, given that final /n/ would likely be lost as in IRL Greek).Creyeditor wrote: ↑22 Apr 2019 21:42 I really like that idea. Did you already think of other changes? Maybe one could do something nice with the vowels (keeping half of them from becoming /i/)?
The only particular change I've come up with is related to the change /u/ > /v/ when in diphthongs. In IRL Greek it eventually devoiced to /f/ in front of voiceless consonants. In this language it would be the opposite (maybe even the trigger for the general voicing of voiceless stops), so that e.g. αὐτός would become /avˈdos/ (and, after vowel reduction, who knows what...)
Languages:
[:D], [;)], [:D], [:|], [:(], [:'(]
A linguistics enthusiast who occasionally frequents the CBB.
- Guide to Slavic accentuation
[:D], [;)], [:D], [:|], [:(], [:'(]
A linguistics enthusiast who occasionally frequents the CBB.
- Guide to Slavic accentuation
- Frislander
- mayan
- Posts: 2088
- Joined: 14 May 2016 18:47
- Location: The North
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
/p t kʷ q (qʷ)/
/p’ t’ t͡ɬ’ t͡ʃ’ kʷ’ ʔ (ʔʷ)/
/s ɬ ʃ xʷ ʜ (ʜʷ) h/
/m n j w/
/i ə~u/
/ɛ a/
The /ə~u/ contrast on the surface is restricted to appearing before uvulars a /q ʔ ʜ/, or alternatively you could interpret this as a labialisation contrast which is otherwise not seen on these consonants, as evidenced by the presence of /u/ before /kʷ kʷ’ xʷ w/ in the same manner. Similarly there is a collapse of the /i ə/ and /ɛ a/ contrasts before palatals, with the front vowels only being found in those contexts.
Syllable structure is CV(C)(C), where any single consonant can appear in the coda, while clusters are restricted to /s ɬ ʃ xʷ ʜ (ʜʷ) m n/ plus a stop, and /p t ʃ kʷ q (qʷ)/ + /s ɬ ʃ xʷ ʜ (ʜʷ)/. These are the only clusters permitted - the morphology is structured to prevent other clusters from arising.
/p’ t’ t͡ɬ’ t͡ʃ’ kʷ’ ʔ (ʔʷ)/
/s ɬ ʃ xʷ ʜ (ʜʷ) h/
/m n j w/
/i ə~u/
/ɛ a/
The /ə~u/ contrast on the surface is restricted to appearing before uvulars a /q ʔ ʜ/, or alternatively you could interpret this as a labialisation contrast which is otherwise not seen on these consonants, as evidenced by the presence of /u/ before /kʷ kʷ’ xʷ w/ in the same manner. Similarly there is a collapse of the /i ə/ and /ɛ a/ contrasts before palatals, with the front vowels only being found in those contexts.
Syllable structure is CV(C)(C), where any single consonant can appear in the coda, while clusters are restricted to /s ɬ ʃ xʷ ʜ (ʜʷ) m n/ plus a stop, and /p t ʃ kʷ q (qʷ)/ + /s ɬ ʃ xʷ ʜ (ʜʷ)/. These are the only clusters permitted - the morphology is structured to prevent other clusters from arising.
- LinguoFranco
- greek
- Posts: 613
- Joined: 20 Jul 2016 17:49
- Location: U.S.
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
/m n ɲ/
/p t c k ʔ/
/mb ⁿd ŋɟ ŋg/
/s z f h/
/l ʎ r/
/j w/
/t͡ɕ d͡ʑ/
/i iː u uː/
/ɛ eː ɔ oː/
/a aː/
/mb ⁿd ŋɟ ŋg/ are supposed to be prenasalized consononats, but the IPA Keyboard only has /ⁿ/. I don't have much for phonotactics yet, although it is looking somewhat similar to my main project, with length distinction on vowels, and will likely be mora-timed. However, I think this language will have palatalization, so /ⁿdʲ/ would become /ⁿd͡ʑ/, for example.
/p t c k ʔ/
/mb ⁿd ŋɟ ŋg/
/s z f h/
/l ʎ r/
/j w/
/t͡ɕ d͡ʑ/
/i iː u uː/
/ɛ eː ɔ oː/
/a aː/
/mb ⁿd ŋɟ ŋg/ are supposed to be prenasalized consononats, but the IPA Keyboard only has /ⁿ/. I don't have much for phonotactics yet, although it is looking somewhat similar to my main project, with length distinction on vowels, and will likely be mora-timed. However, I think this language will have palatalization, so /ⁿdʲ/ would become /ⁿd͡ʑ/, for example.
- DesEsseintes
- mongolian
- Posts: 4331
- Joined: 31 Mar 2013 13:16
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
Here you go:
ᵐb ⁿd ᶯɖ ᶮɟ ᵑɡ
ᵐb ⁿd ᶯɖ ᶮɟ ᵑɡ
- Frislander
- mayan
- Posts: 2088
- Joined: 14 May 2016 18:47
- Location: The North
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
/p~ɸ t~θ k~x q~χ ʔ/
/pː tː tːs kː/
/b~v d~ð g~ɣ/
/m n ŋ/
/mː nː ŋː/
/w ɾ j/
The fricatives are found between vowels. Syllable structure is CV(C), where coda Cs are only found word-finally, but any consonant can come finally except the glides or the flap.
/i ə u/
/a/
/pː tː tːs kː/
/b~v d~ð g~ɣ/
/m n ŋ/
/mː nː ŋː/
/w ɾ j/
The fricatives are found between vowels. Syllable structure is CV(C), where coda Cs are only found word-finally, but any consonant can come finally except the glides or the flap.
/i ə u/
/a/
-
- hieroglyphic
- Posts: 62
- Joined: 19 Mar 2019 07:25
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
What do you think about this phonology? Is it realistic?
/p t k q ʔ/
/p’ t’ k’ q’/ (ejectives)
/b d ɡ ɢ/
/m n ŋ ɴ/
/f v θ ð s z ʃ ʒ x ɣ ħ ʕ h/
/ʍ ʝ ɬ r̥/
/w j l r/
/ɑ i u/
/ə̆ ɪ̆ ʊ̆/
/aː iː uː/
/p t k q ʔ/
/p’ t’ k’ q’/ (ejectives)
/b d ɡ ɢ/
/m n ŋ ɴ/
/f v θ ð s z ʃ ʒ x ɣ ħ ʕ h/
/ʍ ʝ ɬ r̥/
/w j l r/
/ɑ i u/
/ə̆ ɪ̆ ʊ̆/
/aː iː uː/
/tsʲi¹⁴vʲiː⁵³ʎiks³³ iksʔiksʔiks/
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
I've read many times that /ɢ/ and /ɴ/ are rare, but otherwise I don't see anything unusual. It's very "regular" in that there's not many gaps in the inventory - nearly everything fits into a place x manner x phonation grid.
Languages:
[:D], [;)], [:D], [:|], [:(], [:'(]
A linguistics enthusiast who occasionally frequents the CBB.
- Guide to Slavic accentuation
[:D], [;)], [:D], [:|], [:(], [:'(]
A linguistics enthusiast who occasionally frequents the CBB.
- Guide to Slavic accentuation