pö’ li’

A forum for all topics related to constructed languages
Post Reply
vo1dwalk3r
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 108
Joined: 17 Mar 2014 22:37
Location: dʰǵʰémi
Contact:

pö’ li’

Post by vo1dwalk3r »

I've been making lots of progress on Ábḫanni but also continuously overhauling it. Because it's become such a massive project (trying to create the language while evolving it through four earlier forms, and also trying to think about conworld stuff, which I always suck at), I thought it would be a good idea to step back and try a lighter project.

This is pö’ li’ [ˈpø̂ʏ̯ʔ lè̝̰ʔ] ‘the speech’. I plan on making it one of the protolanguages of my embryonic conworld.

Here are some of my ideas motivating the language:
  • Weird phonology and complex syllable structure
  • Very isolating, except for the noun class markers
  • Noun classes with elaborate noun class markers (incl. >4 levels of definiteness, deixis, possession, tense)
  • Verbs are just nouns with special noun class markers
This post will just be about the very first point.

Phonology

Consonants

/m n ŋ/ ⟨m n ŋ
/p t tɬ tʃ ʔ/ ⟨p t ƛ c ’
/ᵐb ⁿd ⁿdˡ ⁿdʒ/ ⟨b d λ j
/f r̝̊ ɬ ʃ h/ ⟨f ɍ ł s h
/v ɾ l ʒ ɣ/ ⟨v r l z g

For the purposes of describing this phonology, there are four POAs: labial, coronal, dorsal, and glottal. So, e.g., /ʃ/ and /n/ are homorganic. Notice that the coronals are never dental; the alveolar–postalveolar contrast is probably as much an apical–laminal contrast as it is a plain–palatalized contrast (if not more).

Here are some allophonic processes:
  • Syllable-finally, /ᵐb ⁿd ⁿdˡ ⁿdʒ/ become [m n nˡ nʲ]; unless preceding a word boundary, [nˡ nʲ] are realized both as [n].
  • Plosives turn into glottal stops when syllable-final and preceding homorganic fricatives or nasals (excluding affricates in the latter case).
  • /ⁿdˡ l/ can be strengthened to [ⁿdɮ ɮ] when preceding a consonant in the same syllable. (Probably, this will be to a large degree dialectal).
  • /r̝̊/ probably becomes /ɹ̝̊/ after /i/.
  • /v ɣ/ can be weakened to [ʋ ɰ], especially syllable-finally or following a consonant, or in unstressed syllables (i.e., usually)
Vowels

/i ʉ/ ⟨i u
/ø ɘ/ ⟨ö ë
/ɛ ɔ/ ⟨e o
/æ ɑ/ ⟨ä a

There are also the diphthongs /ʉɪ̯ ɔɪ̯ ɑɪ̯/ ⟨ui oi ai⟩; moreover, /ɪ̯-/ ⟨i⟩ can be added to any of the preceding phthongs, with the exception of /i/, to produce more diphthongs and even triphthongs.

Vowels also have unstressed ~ stressed forms:
  • /i/: [e̝] ~ [i‎]
  • /ʉ/: [ʉ] ~ [ʊʉ̯]
  • /ø/: [ø] ~ [øʏ̯]
  • /ɘ/: [ɘ] ~ [ɘɪ̯]
  • /ɛ/: [ɛ] ~ [ɛe̯]
  • /ɔ/: [ɔ] ~ [ɔo̯]
  • /æ/: [æ] ~ [æɛ̯]
  • /ɑ/: [ʌ] ~ [ɑ]
  • /ʉɪ̯/: [ʉɪ̯] ~ [ʊɪ̯]
  • /ɔɪ̯/: [ɔɪ̯] ~ [ɔɪ̯]
  • /ɑɪ̯/: [ʌɪ̯] ~ [ɑɪ̯]
Phonotactics

Maximal syllable structure is (C₁)(C₂)(C₃)(C₄)(C₅)(V)(C₆). For the purposes of describing syllable structure constraints, in addition to the previously-defined POAs, we have the three MOAs plosive (including affricates), fricative (including approximants and the tap), and nasal. Each MOA has a sonority value, in which plosive < fricative < nasal.

Any consonant may occur in the coda. If no vowel is present, then no consonant can occupy the C₆ slot. (All vowelless words are monosyllabic.)

The following rules describe restrictions on which sequences of consonants can occur as a syllable onset. Notably, the syllable onset can never be empty.
  • C₁ can only be glottal; no other onset consonant may be glottal.
  • A syllable must have, in terms of sonority, C₂ ≤ C₃ ≤ C₄ ≤ C₅.
  • The only sequences of two adjacent plosives are one of {/tɬ/, /tʃ/} followed by one of {/p/, /ᵐb/}.
  • The only sequences of two adjacent nasals are one of {/m/, /n/} followed by /ŋ/.
  • Three adjacent consonants cannot have the same MOA.
  • Non-affricate plosives cannot precede a nasal consonant.
  • Except for the onsets /$fm-/ and /$vm-/, adjacent consonants cannot have the same POA.
If the consonant C₁ is followed by a consonant and preceded by a vowel (even a vowel of a different word), it will move to become the coda of that syllable. For example, pö’ li’ has the underlying form /pø ʔliʔ/.

Prosody

A syllable has a mora for each component of its nuclear phthong excluding /ɪ̯-/ (i.e., pure vowels are 1 mora, /ʉɪ̯/, /ɔɪ̯/, and /ɑɪ̯/ 2), plus one more if a coda consonant is present (even one assimilated from the following syllable or word). In each stressed word (i.e., nonmonosyllabic (p)articles and the like), the ultimate syllable is stressed, unless the penultimate syllable has a strictly greater number of morae, in which case the penultimate syllable is stressed.

Stressed vowels are pronounced markedly longer than unstressed vowels and have a rising tone, unless they contain an unvoiced consonant as the coda, in which case they take a falling tone. Unstressed vowels followed by a /ʔ/ in the same syllable become creaky and pronounced with a low tone. Strings of unstressed, non-low tone vowels obtain a high tone when following a rising tone syllable. In other words, tone and creaky voice are completely non-phonemic.

Finally, vowels are nasalized preceding a nasal coda consonant. This doesn't really interact with everything else, as far as I'm aware.

Let's put it all together

Here are two sentences (bonus points if people know where I found them). I won't gloss them since I'm saving grammar for later, but hopefully it will give a feeling for the (weird) aesthetic this conlang has been developing.

’äc’äc tav ƛmëŋ biev
[ʔætʃˈʔæ̂ɛ̯tʃ tʌʋ ˈtɬmɘ̃̌ɪ̯̃ŋ ᵐbɪ̯ɛ́ʋ]
'dogs bark'

ŋäf ’o ŋasmi di’
[ˈŋæ̂ɛ̯f ʔɔ ŋʌˈʃmǐ ⁿdè̝̰ʔ]
'the baby laughed'

Thanks for reading! In the next post, I'll start describing the noun classes and their markers. It should, I think, be pretty interesting.
DV82LECM
sinic
sinic
Posts: 280
Joined: 16 Dec 2016 03:31

Re: pö’ li’

Post by DV82LECM »

I am going to be watching this. Is Tibetan an inspiration? One thing, why is the unstressed version of [ɔɪ̯] itself?
𖥑𖧨𖣫𖦺𖣦𖢋𖤼𖥃𖣔𖣋𖢅𖡹𖡨𖡶𖡦𖡧𖡚𖠨
vo1dwalk3r
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 108
Joined: 17 Mar 2014 22:37
Location: dʰǵʰémi
Contact:

Re: pö’ li’

Post by vo1dwalk3r »

DV82LECM wrote: 09 Jun 2020 04:16 I am going to be watching this. Is Tibetan an inspiration?
Glad you like it! I don't really have any specific influences other than keeping the Oceanic/Polynesian languages in the back of my mind (specifically, the sometimes-wierd phonologies of the former and the isolating nature of the latter). I was also thinking about this nice post when coming up with the phonology.
One thing, why is the unstressed version of [ɔɪ̯] itself?
My idea was that, whenever you have [diphthong] + [-ɪ̯], only the first element of the diphthong survives. So, the unstressed ~ stressed pairs for the closing diphthongs look like:

/ʉɪ̯/: [ʉɪ̯] ~ [ʊʉ̯] + [-ɪ̯] > [ʊɪ̯]
/ɔɪ̯/: [ɔɪ̯] ~ [ɔo̯] + [-ɪ̯] > [ɔɪ̯]
/ɑɪ̯/: [ʌɪ̯] ~ [ɑ] + [-ɪ̯] > [ɑɪ̯]
User avatar
Creyeditor
MVP
MVP
Posts: 5091
Joined: 14 Aug 2012 19:32

Re: pö’ li’

Post by Creyeditor »

I really enjoy this so far. I like that you put a focus on phonological structure and processes.
Creyeditor
"Thoughts are free."
Produce, Analyze, Manipulate
1 :deu: 2 :eng: 3 :idn: 4 :fra: 4 :esp:
:con: Ook & Omlűt & Nautli languages & Sperenjas
[<3] Papuan languages, Morphophonology, Lexical Semantics [<3]
Post Reply