anyway

[xijlwya]

He will go there anyway.
Er wird da eh (informal)/ohnehin (formal) hingehen

goshpysheshta: gain pakthien kue pien pwthsi besh

Spoiler:

/gain pakTi@n ku@ pi@n pQTsi b@s\/
but circumstance COP 3 towards DET
"gain pakthien" is a fixed phrase

[Micamo]

He will go there anyway.
Er wird da eh (informal)/ohnehin (formal) hingehen

goshpysheshta: gain pakthien kue pien pwthsi besh
Agyonnar: Veri dera yoso zo. (3 there go necessity)

The other usage of anyway, as in "Anyway, we ended up not going." is "muntor ea na", lit. "Changing the subject."

[xijlwya]

The other usage of anyway, as in "Anyway, we ended up not going." is "muntor ea na", lit. "Changing the subject."

Let's add this to the challenge! See below. I just added the future tense to the first phrase, because I forgot it.

Micamo, doesn't your phrase translate back into sth. like "s/he must go there" or "it is neccessary for him/her to go there"? How do you (if you do at all) differentiate that?


1. He will go there anyway.
2. Anyway, we ended up not going.


1. Er wird da eh (informal)/ohnehin (formal) hingehen
2. Wie auch immer, wir sind letztendlich nicht gegangen.

goshpysheshta:
1. gain pakthien oka kue pien pwthsi besh
2. nwa pwtshe hwath kadukh ga onue poi pwthsi besh pa

Spoiler:

/nQa pQts\@ hQaT kadux ga onu@ poi pQTsi b@s\ pa/
of something-else PST result(v) REL COP.NEG 2 towards DET REL

Agyonnar: Veri dera yoso zo. (3 there go necessity)

[Micamo]

Let's add this to the challenge! See below. I just added the future tense to the first phrase, because I forgot it.

Micamo, doesn't your phrase translate back into sth. like "s/he must go there" or "it is neccessary for him/her to go there"? How do you (if you do at all) differentiate that?

I interpreted your challenge as meaning "We tried to stop him, but he will go there anyway. We could only delay the inevitable." That is, an aforementioned attempt to change things failed, so what we tried to change is going to happen. Thus I felt necessity was a good way to express this. Did you have another meaning in mind?


1. He will go there anyway.
2. Anyway, we ended up not going.


1. Er wird da eh (informal)/ohnehin (formal) hingehen
2. Wie auch immer, wir sind letztendlich nicht gegangen.

goshpysheshta:
1. gain pakthien oka kue pien pwthsi besh
2. nwa pwtshe hwath kadukh ga onue poi pwthsi besh pa

Agyonnar:
1. Veri dera yoso za. (3 there go necessity)
2. Muntor ea na, dzo yoso zo tomal. (topic change PARTICIPLE, 1 go NEG terminal) Lit. Changing the subject, in the end we did not go.

Also corrected the first one, I mixed up negation (zo) with necessity (za).

[xijlwya]

I interpreted your challenge as meaning "We tried to stop him, but he will go there anyway. We could only delay the inevitable." That is, an aforementioned attempt to change things failed, so what we tried to change is going to happen. Thus I felt necessity was a good way to express this. Did you have another meaning in mind?

I would treat the anyway as a "despite aformentioned circumstances". I didn't even think about what these circumstances could be. Thus I got something like No matter what happend or was said before, he will go there.
Still, translating your phrase with 'necessarily' made sense to me: "He necessarily will go there." - zwingendermaßen would be a nice german word for it...

The strange thing that occured to me is that anyway means something like "without any conditions" to me, but your necessity implies that there are conditions. Maybe this a kind of logical interference I got here. It rather confuses me o.O

[Micamo]

I interpreted your challenge as meaning "We tried to stop him, but he will go there anyway. We could only delay the inevitable." That is, an aforementioned attempt to change things failed, so what we tried to change is going to happen. Thus I felt necessity was a good way to express this. Did you have another meaning in mind?

I would treat the anyway as a "despite aformentioned circumstances". I didn't even think about what these circumstances could be. Thus I got something like No matter what happend or was said before, he will go there.
Still, translating your phrase with 'necessarily' made sense to me: "He necessarily will go there." - zwingendermaßen would be a nice german word for it...

The strange thing that occured to me is that anyway means something like "without any conditions" to me, but your necessity implies that there are conditions. Maybe this a kind of logical interference I got here. It rather confuses me o.O

"Our efforts were unsuccessful" is a weaker statement of the same class as "All possible efforts would have been unsuccessful." Both types are conveyed by "zo."

[Ossicone]

1. He will go there anyway.
2. Anyway, we ended up not going.


1. Er wird da eh (informal)/ohnehin (formal) hingehen
2. Wie auch immer, wir sind letztendlich nicht gegangen.

goshpysheshta:
1. gain pakthien oka kue pien pwthsi besh
2. nwa pwtshe hwath kadukh ga onue poi pwthsi besh pa

Agyonnar:
1. Veri dera yoso za. (3 there go necessity)
2. Muntor ea na, dzo yoso zo tomal. (topic change PARTICIPLE, 1 go NEG terminal) Lit. Changing the subject, in the end we did not go.

Inyauk:
1. Ním ápatabam apya-úranikat púxiyah.

Spoiler:

/'nim 'apatabam apjaʔ'uranikat 'puʃijax/
ní-im ápat-ab-am apja-úran-ikat púʃ-ijax
3sg-AGT go-FUT-SRT DSL-place-DST regard-WTO
AGT=Agent FUT=Future SRT=Starting action DSL=Distal DST=Destination WTO=Without

2. Tárimfinyaniixa txú-im ya-ápatnadinimalana.

Spoiler:

/'tarimfiɲaniixa 'ʧuʔim jaʔ'apatnadinimalana/
tárimfíɲani-ixa ʧú-im ja-ápat-na-dinim-al-ana
thought.new-WTH 1pl-AGT NEG-go-ADJ-end-PST-CNT
WTH=With AGT=Agent NEG=Negation ADJ=Adjectiser PST=Past CNT=Continuous action

[Khemehekis]

1. He will go there anyway.
2. Anyway, we ended up not going.


1. Er wird da eh (informal)/ohnehin (formal) hingehen
2. Wie auch immer, wir sind letztendlich nicht gegangen.

goshpysheshta:
1. gain pakthien oka kue pien pwthsi besh
2. nwa pwtshe hwath kadukh ga onue poi pwthsi besh pa

Agyonnar:
1. Veri dera yoso za. (3 there go necessity)
2. Muntor ea na, dzo yoso zo tomal. (topic change PARTICIPLE, 1 go NEG terminal) Lit. Changing the subject, in the end we did not go.

Inyauk:
1. Ním ápatabam apya-úranikat púxiyah.

Spoiler:

/'nim 'apatabam apxaʔ'uranikat 'puʃijax/
ní-im ápat-ab-am apxa-úran-ikat púʃ-ijax
3sg-AGT go-FUT-SRT DSL-place-DST regard-WTO
AGT=Agent FUT=Future SRT=Starting action DSL=Distal DST=Destination WTO=Without

2. Tárimfinyaniixa txú-im ya-ápatnadinimalana.

Spoiler:

/'tarimfiɲaniixa 'ʧuʔim jaʔ'apatnadinimalana/
tárimfíɲani-ixa ʧú-im ja-ápat-na-dinim-al-ana
thought.new-WTH 1pl-AGT NEG-go-ADJ-end-PST-CNT
WTH=With AGT=Agent NEG=Negation ADJ=Adjectiser PST=Past CNT=Continuous action

Kankonian:
1. Wan uhwos ad els pol.
he go+FUTURE to there anyway
2. Mabez, wir ihalen os uhu.
so_anyway we end_up+PAST not go

[Thakowsaizmu]

1. He will go there anyway.
2. Anyway, we ended up not going.


1. Er wird da eh (informal)/ohnehin (formal) hingehen
2. Wie auch immer, wir sind letztendlich nicht gegangen.

goshpysheshta:
1. gain pakthien oka kue pien pwthsi besh
2. nwa pwtshe hwath kadukh ga onue poi pwthsi besh pa

Agyonnar:
1. Veri dera yoso za. (3 there go necessity)
2. Muntor ea na, dzo yoso zo tomal. (topic change PARTICIPLE, 1 go NEG terminal) Lit. Changing the subject, in the end we did not go.

Inyauk:
1. Ním ápatabam apya-úranikat púxiyah.

Spoiler:

/'nim 'apatabam apxaʔ'uranikat 'puʃijax/
ní-im ápat-ab-am apxa-úran-ikat púʃ-ijax
3sg-AGT go-FUT-SRT DSL-place-DST regard-WTO
AGT=Agent FUT=Future SRT=Starting action DSL=Distal DST=Destination WTO=Without

2. Tárimfinyaniixa txú-im ya-ápatnadinimalana.

Spoiler:

/'tarimfiɲaniixa 'ʧuʔim jaʔ'apatnadinimalana/
tárimfíɲani-ixa ʧú-im ja-ápat-na-dinim-al-ana
thought.new-WTH 1pl-AGT NEG-go-ADJ-end-PST-CNT
WTH=With AGT=Agent NEG=Negation ADJ=Adjectiser PST=Past CNT=Continuous action

Kankonian:
1. Wan uhwos ad els pol.
he go+FUTURE to there anyway
2. Mabez, wir ihalen os uhu.
so_anyway we end_up+PAST not go

Changshuo
1) Chuăndalinŭ, jŭga zhusuochau zailhai zhi. /ts`M\{ndAlin}_c dz\}_cgA dz`MsM\7ts`AM dzAiKAi dz`i/ contrarily-TOPIC, 3psm-ERG that_place_toward go PREDICTIVE
2) Sō de, waeraga zailhaină hada. /so:dE M\AE4AgA dzAiKAin{ hAdA/ topic_change 1pp-ERG go-NEG PAST-INDICATIVE

[Trailsend]

1. He will go there anyway.
2. Anyway, we ended up not going.


1. Er wird da eh (informal)/ohnehin (formal) hingehen
2. Wie auch immer, wir sind letztendlich nicht gegangen.

goshpysheshta:
1. gain pakthien oka kue pien pwthsi besh
2. nwa pwtshe hwath kadukh ga onue poi pwthsi besh pa

Agyonnar:
1. Veri dera yoso za. (3 there go necessity)
2. Muntor ea na, dzo yoso zo tomal. (topic change PARTICIPLE, 1 go NEG terminal) Lit. Changing the subject, in the end we did not go.

Inyauk:
1. Ním ápatabam apya-úranikat púxiyah.

Spoiler:

/'nim 'apatabam apxaʔ'uranikat 'puʃijax/
ní-im ápat-ab-am apxa-úran-ikat púʃ-ijax
3sg-AGT go-FUT-SRT DSL-place-DST regard-WTO
AGT=Agent FUT=Future SRT=Starting action DSL=Distal DST=Destination WTO=Without

2. Tárimfinyaniixa txú-im ya-ápatnadinimalana.

Spoiler:

/'tarimfiɲaniixa 'ʧuʔim jaʔ'apatnadinimalana/
tárimfíɲani-ixa ʧú-im ja-ápat-na-dinim-al-ana
thought.new-WTH 1pl-AGT NEG-go-ADJ-end-PST-CNT
WTH=With AGT=Agent NEG=Negation ADJ=Adjectiser PST=Past CNT=Continuous action

Kankonian:
1. Wan uhwos ad els pol.
he go+FUTURE to there anyway
2. Mabez, wir ihalen os uhu.
so_anyway we end_up+PAST not go

Changshuo
1. Chuăndalinŭ, jŭga zhusuochau zailhai zhi. /ts`M\{ndAlin}_c dz\}_cgA dz`MsM\7ts`AM dzAiKAi dz`i/ contrarily-TOPIC, 3psm-ERG that_place_toward go PREDICTIVE
2. Sō de, waeraga zailhaină hada. /so:dE M\AE4AgA dzAiKAin{ hAdA/ topic_change 1pp-ERG go-NEG PAST-INDICATIVE

Feayran
1. Róu/gí/shíi/núk úk suvá úk kusàolkurhrávuìrrira.

Spoiler:

One of several interjections would almost certainly need to be added to the front of this phrase in "real" speech (as opposed to an isolated elicitation). Róu denotes an air of confidence and certainty and implies that the speaker agrees with the traveler's course of action; gí is similar, but strengthens the connotation of gladness about the situation; shíi indicates concern or discomfort, implying that the speaker thinks the traveler is making a mistake; núk is likewise negative, but stronger. A few other interjections could conceivably be used as well; háa would add a sense of apathy, ué a sense of urgency or attention, etc.

ROU/GI/SHII/NUK but<LEAD> AUX<LEAD-STAT-INTR> but<LEAD> go<LEAD-AUX<ABL.INAN>-CLS(male).LEAD.S-CONJ-INTR-CLS(territory)<LAT.FOLLOW>>

The connotation of "anyway" arises from the combination of the "úk X úk Y" structure, which is used to tag opposing or conflicting constituents, and the verb<AUX<ABL>> incorporation structure, which indicates that the verb arose out of some other situation. Usually this forms causative constructions, with the resulting state incorporating the AUX<ABL> marker to show that it happened because of something else. But here, the addition of the "úk" contrast markers says that although the two verbs oppose each other, still one led to the other. (The isolated auxiliary verb "suvá" is an anaphoric reference to whatever situation the speaker was previously discussing; it is required because series of constituents tagged with "úk" must contain at least 2 elements.)

2. Náa kaaùnkára sukáhakosh.

Spoiler:

Náa is a "transitional" interjection used in a wide variety of contexts. One of its functions is to mark movement between topics.

NAA go<1.LEAD.P-NEG-PERF-INTR> AUX<LEAD-PERF-INTR-finish<LOC.INAN>>

An alternative translation would be to forgo the isolated auxiliary verb, moving the incorporated finish<LOC.INAN> root to the main verb: Náa kaaùnkáhakoshra. Both are valid, but the former takes greater care to indicate that "finish" is meant metaphorically rather than literally.

[Pirka]

1. He will go there anyway.
2. Anyway, we ended up not going.


1. Er wird da eh (informal)/ohnehin (formal) hingehen
2. Wie auch immer, wir sind letztendlich nicht gegangen.


1. Он все равно туда пойдет.
2. Короче говоря/в общем, мы никуда не пошли.

goshpysheshta:
1. gain pakthien oka kue pien pwthsi besh
2. nwa pwtshe hwath kadukh ga onue poi pwthsi besh pa

Agyonnar:
1. Veri dera yoso za. (3 there go necessity)
2. Muntor ea na, dzo yoso zo tomal. (topic change PARTICIPLE, 1 go NEG terminal) Lit. Changing the subject, in the end we did not go.

Inyauk:
1. Ním ápatabam apya-úranikat púxiyah.

Spoiler:

/'nim 'apatabam apxaʔ'uranikat 'puʃijax/
ní-im ápat-ab-am apxa-úran-ikat púʃ-ijax
3sg-AGT go-FUT-SRT DSL-place-DST regard-WTO
AGT=Agent FUT=Future SRT=Starting action DSL=Distal DST=Destination WTO=Without

2. Tárimfinyaniixa txú-im ya-ápatnadinimalana.

Spoiler:

/'tarimfiɲaniixa 'ʧuʔim jaʔ'apatnadinimalana/
tárimfíɲani-ixa ʧú-im ja-ápat-na-dinim-al-ana
thought.new-WTH 1pl-AGT NEG-go-ADJ-end-PST-CNT
WTH=With AGT=Agent NEG=Negation ADJ=Adjectiser PST=Past CNT=Continuous action

Kankonian:
1. Wan uhwos ad els pol.
he go+FUTURE to there anyway
2. Mabez, wir ihalen os uhu.
so_anyway we end_up+PAST not go

Changshuo
1. Chuăndalinŭ, jŭga zhusuochau zailhai zhi. /ts`M\{ndAlin}_c dz\}_cgA dz`MsM\7ts`AM dzAiKAi dz`i/ contrarily-TOPIC, 3psm-ERG that_place_toward go PREDICTIVE
2. Sō de, waeraga zailhaină hada. /so:dE M\AE4AgA dzAiKAin{ hAdA/ topic_change 1pp-ERG go-NEG PAST-INDICATIVE

Feayran
1. Róu/gí/shíi/núk úk suvá úk kusàolkurhrávuìrrira.

Spoiler:

One of several interjections would almost certainly need to be added to the front of this phrase in "real" speech (as opposed to an isolated elicitation). Róu denotes an air of confidence and certainty and implies that the speaker agrees with the traveler's course of action; gí is similar, but strengthens the connotation of gladness about the situation; shíi indicates concern or discomfort, implying that the speaker thinks the traveler is making a mistake; núk is likewise negative, but stronger. A few other interjections could conceivably be used as well; háa would add a sense of apathy, ué a sense of urgency or attention, etc.

ROU/GI/SHII/NUK but<LEAD> AUX<LEAD-STAT-INTR> but<LEAD> go<LEAD-AUX<ABL.INAN>-CLS(male).LEAD.S-CONJ-INTR-CLS(territory)<LAT.FOLLOW>>

The connotation of "anyway" arises from the combination of the "úk X úk Y" structure, which is used to tag opposing or conflicting constituents, and the verb<AUX<ABL>> incorporation structure, which indicates that the verb arose out of some other situation. Usually this forms causative constructions, with the resulting state incorporating the AUX<ABL> marker to show that it happened because of something else. But here, the addition of the "úk" contrast markers says that although the two verbs oppose each other, still one led to the other. (The isolated auxiliary verb "suvá" is an anaphoric reference to whatever situation the speaker was previously discussing; it is required because series of constituents tagged with "úk" must contain at least 2 elements.)

2. Náa kaaùnkára sukáhakosh.

Spoiler:

Náa is a "transitional" interjection used in a wide variety of contexts. One of its functions is to mark movement between topics.

NAA go<1.LEAD.P-NEG-PERF-INTR> AUX<LEAD-PERF-INTR-finish<LOC.INAN>>

An alternative translation would be to forgo the isolated auxiliary verb, moving the incorporated finish<LOC.INAN> root to the main verb: Náa kaaùnkáhakoshra. Both are valid, but the former takes greater care to indicate that "finish" is meant metaphorically rather than literally.

[Raydred]

1. He will go there anyway.
2. Anyway, we ended up not going.


1. Er wird da eh (informal)/ohnehin (formal) hingehen
2. Wie auch immer, wir sind letztendlich nicht gegangen.


1. Онвсе равно туда пойдет.
2. Короче говоря/в общем, мы никуда не пошли.


1.Ele vai de qualquer forma.
2.De qualquer forma, nós acabámos por não ir.

goshpysheshta:
1. gain pakthien oka kue pien pwthsi besh
2. nwa pwtshe hwath kadukh ga onue poi pwthsi besh pa

Agyonnar:
1. Veri dera yoso za. (3 there go necessity)
2. Muntor ea na, dzo yoso zo tomal. (topic change PARTICIPLE, 1 go NEG terminal) Lit. Changing the subject, in the end we did not go.

Inyauk:
1. Ním ápatabam apya-úranikat púxiyah.

Spoiler:

/'nim 'apatabam apxaʔ'uranikat 'puʃijax/
ní-im ápat-ab-am apxa-úran-ikat púʃ-ijax
3sg-AGT go-FUT-SRT DSL-place-DST regard-WTO
AGT=Agent FUT=Future SRT=Starting action DSL=Distal DST=Destination WTO=Without

2. Tárimfinyaniixa txú-im ya-ápatnadinimalana.

Spoiler:

/'tarimfiɲaniixa 'ʧuʔim jaʔ'apatnadinimalana/
tárimfíɲani-ixa ʧú-im ja-ápat-na-dinim-al-ana
thought.new-WTH 1pl-AGT NEG-go-ADJ-end-PST-CNT
WTH=With AGT=Agent NEG=Negation ADJ=Adjectiser PST=Past CNT=Continuous action

Kankonian:
1. Wan uhwos ad els pol.
he go+FUTURE to there anyway
2. Mabez, wir ihalen os uhu.
so_anyway we end_up+PAST not go

Changshuo
1. Chuăndalinŭ, jŭga zhusuochau zailhai zhi. /ts`M\{ndAlin}_c dz\}_cgA dz`MsM\7ts`AM dzAiKAi dz`i/ contrarily-TOPIC, 3psm-ERG that_place_toward go PREDICTIVE
2. Sō de, waeraga zailhaină hada. /so:dE M\AE4AgA dzAiKAin{ hAdA/ topic_change 1pp-ERG go-NEG PAST-INDICATIVE

Feayran
1. Róu/gí/shíi/núk úk suvá úk kusàolkurhrávuìrrira.

Spoiler:

One of several interjections would almost certainly need to be added to the front of this phrase in "real" speech (as opposed to an isolated elicitation). Róu denotes an air of confidence and certainty and implies that the speaker agrees with the traveler's course of action; gí is similar, but strengthens the connotation of gladness about the situation; shíi indicates concern or discomfort, implying that the speaker thinks the traveler is making a mistake; núk is likewise negative, but stronger. A few other interjections could conceivably be used as well; háa would add a sense of apathy, ué a sense of urgency or attention, etc.

ROU/GI/SHII/NUK but<LEAD> AUX<LEAD-STAT-INTR> but<LEAD> go<LEAD-AUX<ABL.INAN>-CLS(male).LEAD.S-CONJ-INTR-CLS(territory)<LAT.FOLLOW>>

The connotation of "anyway" arises from the combination of the "úk X úk Y" structure, which is used to tag opposing or conflicting constituents, and the verb<AUX<ABL>> incorporation structure, which indicates that the verb arose out of some other situation. Usually this forms causative constructions, with the resulting state incorporating the AUX<ABL> marker to show that it happened because of something else. But here, the addition of the "úk" contrast markers says that although the two verbs oppose each other, still one led to the other. (The isolated auxiliary verb "suvá" is an anaphoric reference to whatever situation the speaker was previously discussing; it is required because series of constituents tagged with "úk" must contain at least 2 elements.)

2. Náa kaaùnkára sukáhakosh.

Spoiler:

Náa is a "transitional" interjection used in a wide variety of contexts. One of its functions is to mark movement between topics.

NAA go<1.LEAD.P-NEG-PERF-INTR> AUX<LEAD-PERF-INTR-finish<LOC.INAN>>

An alternative translation would be to forgo the isolated auxiliary verb, moving the incorporated finish<LOC.INAN> root to the main verb: Náa kaaùnkáhakoshra. Both are valid, but the former takes greater care to indicate that "finish" is meant metaphorically rather than literally.

[Testyal]

1. He will go there anyway.
2. Anyway, we ended up not going.


1. Er wird da eh (informal)/ohnehin (formal) hingehen
2. Wie auch immer, wir sind letztendlich nicht gegangen.


1. Онвсе равно туда пойдет.
2. Короче говоря/в общем, мы никуда не пошли.


1.Ele vai de qualquer forma.
2.De qualquer forma, nós acabámos por não ir.

goshpysheshta:
1. gain pakthien oka kue pien pwthsi besh
2. nwa pwtshe hwath kadukh ga onue poi pwthsi besh pa

Agyonnar:
1. Veri dera yoso za. (3 there go necessity)
2. Muntor ea na, dzo yoso zo tomal. (topic change PARTICIPLE, 1 go NEG terminal) Lit. Changing the subject, in the end we did not go.

Inyauk:
1. Ním ápatabam apya-úranikat púxiyah.

Spoiler:

/'nim 'apatabam apxaʔ'uranikat 'puʃijax/
ní-im ápat-ab-am apxa-úran-ikat púʃ-ijax
3sg-AGT go-FUT-SRT DSL-place-DST regard-WTO
AGT=Agent FUT=Future SRT=Starting action DSL=Distal DST=Destination WTO=Without

2. Tárimfinyaniixa txú-im ya-ápatnadinimalana.

Spoiler:

/'tarimfiɲaniixa 'ʧuʔim jaʔ'apatnadinimalana/
tárimfíɲani-ixa ʧú-im ja-ápat-na-dinim-al-ana
thought.new-WTH 1pl-AGT NEG-go-ADJ-end-PST-CNT
WTH=With AGT=Agent NEG=Negation ADJ=Adjectiser PST=Past CNT=Continuous action

Kankonian:
1. Wan uhwos ad els pol.
he go+FUTURE to there anyway
2. Mabez, wir ihalen os uhu.
so_anyway we end_up+PAST not go

Changshuo
1. Chuăndalinŭ, jŭga zhusuochau zailhai zhi. /ts`M\{ndAlin}_c dz\}_cgA dz`MsM\7ts`AM dzAiKAi dz`i/ contrarily-TOPIC, 3psm-ERG that_place_toward go PREDICTIVE
2. Sō de, waeraga zailhaină hada. /so:dE M\AE4AgA dzAiKAin{ hAdA/ topic_change 1pp-ERG go-NEG PAST-INDICATIVE

Feayran
1. Róu/gí/shíi/núk úk suvá úk kusàolkurhrávuìrrira.

Spoiler:

One of several interjections would almost certainly need to be added to the front of this phrase in "real" speech (as opposed to an isolated elicitation). Róu denotes an air of confidence and certainty and implies that the speaker agrees with the traveler's course of action; gí is similar, but strengthens the connotation of gladness about the situation; shíi indicates concern or discomfort, implying that the speaker thinks the traveler is making a mistake; núk is likewise negative, but stronger. A few other interjections could conceivably be used as well; háa would add a sense of apathy, ué a sense of urgency or attention, etc.

ROU/GI/SHII/NUK but<LEAD> AUX<LEAD-STAT-INTR> but<LEAD> go<LEAD-AUX<ABL.INAN>-CLS(male).LEAD.S-CONJ-INTR-CLS(territory)<LAT.FOLLOW>>

The connotation of "anyway" arises from the combination of the "úk X úk Y" structure, which is used to tag opposing or conflicting constituents, and the verb<AUX<ABL>> incorporation structure, which indicates that the verb arose out of some other situation. Usually this forms causative constructions, with the resulting state incorporating the AUX<ABL> marker to show that it happened because of something else. But here, the addition of the "úk" contrast markers says that although the two verbs oppose each other, still one led to the other. (The isolated auxiliary verb "suvá" is an anaphoric reference to whatever situation the speaker was previously discussing; it is required because series of constituents tagged with "úk" must contain at least 2 elements.)

2. Náa kaaùnkára sukáhakosh.

Spoiler:

Náa is a "transitional" interjection used in a wide variety of contexts. One of its functions is to mark movement between topics.

NAA go<1.LEAD.P-NEG-PERF-INTR> AUX<LEAD-PERF-INTR-finish<LOC.INAN>>

An alternative translation would be to forgo the isolated auxiliary verb, moving the incorporated finish<LOC.INAN> root to the main verb: Náa kaaùnkáhakoshra. Both are valid, but the former takes greater care to indicate that "finish" is meant metaphorically rather than literally.

Staalouvan
1. Daa geituuvai, ssou.
2. Eba geiopuuv'a nei. (lit. But we didn't go)

[Ceresz]

1. He will go there anyway.
2. Anyway, we ended up not going.


1. Han kommer att gå dit ändå.
2. Hur som helst slutade det med att vi inte gick (dit).


1. Er wird da eh (informal)/ohnehin (formal) hingehen
2. Wie auch immer, wir sind letztendlich nicht gegangen.


1. Онвсе равно туда пойдет.
2. Короче говоря/в общем, мы никуда не пошли.


1.Ele vai de qualquer forma.
2.De qualquer forma, nós acabámos por não ir.

goshpysheshta:
1. gain pakthien oka kue pien pwthsi besh
2. nwa pwtshe hwath kadukh ga onue poi pwthsi besh pa

Agyonnar:
1. Veri dera yoso za. (3 there go necessity)
2. Muntor ea na, dzo yoso zo tomal. (topic change PARTICIPLE, 1 go NEG terminal) Lit. Changing the subject, in the end we did not go.

Inyauk:
1. Ním ápatabam apya-úranikat púxiyah.

Spoiler:

/'nim 'apatabam apxaʔ'uranikat 'puʃijax/
ní-im ápat-ab-am apxa-úran-ikat púʃ-ijax
3sg-AGT go-FUT-SRT DSL-place-DST regard-WTO
AGT=Agent FUT=Future SRT=Starting action DSL=Distal DST=Destination WTO=Without

2. Tárimfinyaniixa txú-im ya-ápatnadinimalana.

Spoiler:

/'tarimfiɲaniixa 'ʧuʔim jaʔ'apatnadinimalana/
tárimfíɲani-ixa ʧú-im ja-ápat-na-dinim-al-ana
thought.new-WTH 1pl-AGT NEG-go-ADJ-end-PST-CNT
WTH=With AGT=Agent NEG=Negation ADJ=Adjectiser PST=Past CNT=Continuous action

Kankonian:
1. Wan uhwos ad els pol.
he go+FUTURE to there anyway
2. Mabez, wir ihalen os uhu.
so_anyway we end_up+PAST not go

Changshuo
1. Chuăndalinŭ, jŭga zhusuochau zailhai zhi. /ts`M\{ndAlin}_c dz\}_cgA dz`MsM\7ts`AM dzAiKAi dz`i/ contrarily-TOPIC, 3psm-ERG that_place_toward go PREDICTIVE
2. Sō de, waeraga zailhaină hada. /so:dE M\AE4AgA dzAiKAin{ hAdA/ topic_change 1pp-ERG go-NEG PAST-INDICATIVE

Feayran
1. Róu/gí/shíi/núk úk suvá úk kusàolkurhrávuìrrira.

Spoiler:

One of several interjections would almost certainly need to be added to the front of this phrase in "real" speech (as opposed to an isolated elicitation). Róu denotes an air of confidence and certainty and implies that the speaker agrees with the traveler's course of action; gí is similar, but strengthens the connotation of gladness about the situation; shíi indicates concern or discomfort, implying that the speaker thinks the traveler is making a mistake; núk is likewise negative, but stronger. A few other interjections could conceivably be used as well; háa would add a sense of apathy, ué a sense of urgency or attention, etc.

ROU/GI/SHII/NUK but<LEAD> AUX<LEAD-STAT-INTR> but<LEAD> go<LEAD-AUX<ABL.INAN>-CLS(male).LEAD.S-CONJ-INTR-CLS(territory)<LAT.FOLLOW>>

The connotation of "anyway" arises from the combination of the "úk X úk Y" structure, which is used to tag opposing or conflicting constituents, and the verb<AUX<ABL>> incorporation structure, which indicates that the verb arose out of some other situation. Usually this forms causative constructions, with the resulting state incorporating the AUX<ABL> marker to show that it happened because of something else. But here, the addition of the "úk" contrast markers says that although the two verbs oppose each other, still one led to the other. (The isolated auxiliary verb "suvá" is an anaphoric reference to whatever situation the speaker was previously discussing; it is required because series of constituents tagged with "úk" must contain at least 2 elements.)

2. Náa kaaùnkára sukáhakosh.

Spoiler:

Náa is a "transitional" interjection used in a wide variety of contexts. One of its functions is to mark movement between topics.

NAA go<1.LEAD.P-NEG-PERF-INTR> AUX<LEAD-PERF-INTR-finish<LOC.INAN>>

An alternative translation would be to forgo the isolated auxiliary verb, moving the incorporated finish<LOC.INAN> root to the main verb: Náa kaaùnkáhakoshra. Both are valid, but the former takes greater care to indicate that "finish" is meant metaphorically rather than literally.

Staalouvan
1. Daa geituuvai, ssou.
2. Eba geiopuuv'a nei. (lit. But we didn't go)

[Utlandr]

1. He will go there anyway.
2. Anyway, we ended up not going.


1. Han kommer att gå dit ändå.
2. Hur som helst slutade det med att vi inte gick (dit).


1. Er wird da eh (informal)/ohnehin (formal) hingehen
2. Wie auch immer, wir sind letztendlich nicht gegangen.


1. Онвсе равно туда пойдет.
2. Короче говоря/в общем, мы никуда не пошли.


1.Ele vai de qualquer forma.
2.De qualquer forma, nós acabámos por não ir.

goshpysheshta:
1. gain pakthien oka kue pien pwthsi besh
2. nwa pwtshe hwath kadukh ga onue poi pwthsi besh pa

Agyonnar:
1. Veri dera yoso za. (3 there go necessity)
2. Muntor ea na, dzo yoso zo tomal. (topic change PARTICIPLE, 1 go NEG terminal) Lit. Changing the subject, in the end we did not go.

Inyauk:
1. Ním ápatabam apya-úranikat púxiyah.

Spoiler:

/'nim 'apatabam apxaʔ'uranikat 'puʃijax/
ní-im ápat-ab-am apxa-úran-ikat púʃ-ijax
3sg-AGT go-FUT-SRT DSL-place-DST regard-WTO
AGT=Agent FUT=Future SRT=Starting action DSL=Distal DST=Destination WTO=Without

2. Tárimfinyaniixa txú-im ya-ápatnadinimalana.

Spoiler:

/'tarimfiɲaniixa 'ʧuʔim jaʔ'apatnadinimalana/
tárimfíɲani-ixa ʧú-im ja-ápat-na-dinim-al-ana
thought.new-WTH 1pl-AGT NEG-go-ADJ-end-PST-CNT
WTH=With AGT=Agent NEG=Negation ADJ=Adjectiser PST=Past CNT=Continuous action

Kankonian:
1. Wan uhwos ad els pol.
he go+FUTURE to there anyway
2. Mabez, wir ihalen os uhu.
so_anyway we end_up+PAST not go

Changshuo
1. Chuăndalinŭ, jŭga zhusuochau zailhai zhi. /ts`M\{ndAlin}_c dz\}_cgA dz`MsM\7ts`AM dzAiKAi dz`i/ contrarily-TOPIC, 3psm-ERG that_place_toward go PREDICTIVE
2. Sō de, waeraga zailhaină hada. /so:dE M\AE4AgA dzAiKAin{ hAdA/ topic_change 1pp-ERG go-NEG PAST-INDICATIVE

Feayran
1. Róu/gí/shíi/núk úk suvá úk kusàolkurhrávuìrrira.

Spoiler:

One of several interjections would almost certainly need to be added to the front of this phrase in "real" speech (as opposed to an isolated elicitation). Róu denotes an air of confidence and certainty and implies that the speaker agrees with the traveler's course of action; gí is similar, but strengthens the connotation of gladness about the situation; shíi indicates concern or discomfort, implying that the speaker thinks the traveler is making a mistake; núk is likewise negative, but stronger. A few other interjections could conceivably be used as well; háa would add a sense of apathy, ué a sense of urgency or attention, etc.

ROU/GI/SHII/NUK but<LEAD> AUX<LEAD-STAT-INTR> but<LEAD> go<LEAD-AUX<ABL.INAN>-CLS(male).LEAD.S-CONJ-INTR-CLS(territory)<LAT.FOLLOW>>

The connotation of "anyway" arises from the combination of the "úk X úk Y" structure, which is used to tag opposing or conflicting constituents, and the verb<AUX<ABL>> incorporation structure, which indicates that the verb arose out of some other situation. Usually this forms causative constructions, with the resulting state incorporating the AUX<ABL> marker to show that it happened because of something else. But here, the addition of the "úk" contrast markers says that although the two verbs oppose each other, still one led to the other. (The isolated auxiliary verb "suvá" is an anaphoric reference to whatever situation the speaker was previously discussing; it is required because series of constituents tagged with "úk" must contain at least 2 elements.)

2. Náa kaaùnkára sukáhakosh.

Spoiler:

Náa is a "transitional" interjection used in a wide variety of contexts. One of its functions is to mark movement between topics.

NAA go<1.LEAD.P-NEG-PERF-INTR> AUX<LEAD-PERF-INTR-finish<LOC.INAN>>

An alternative translation would be to forgo the isolated auxiliary verb, moving the incorporated finish<LOC.INAN> root to the main verb: Náa kaaùnkáhakoshra. Both are valid, but the former takes greater care to indicate that "finish" is meant metaphorically rather than literally.

Staalouvan
1. Daa geituuvai, ssou.
2. Eba geiopuuv'a nei. (lit. But we didn't go)

Wistra Gutisk:
1. Is gaggan haba þaruh þannu.
2. Þannu, wit(Dual) weis(Pl) ni atgaggos(Dual) atgaggam(Pl).

[Iyionaku]

Yélian

Rocuret pès atonúm náiotat.
[ɾɔˈkuːɾə̆‿pɛs ˌatɔˈnuːm ˈnaɪ̯ɔtɐt]
FUT-come-3SG to there anyway
He will go there anyway.