Examples of questions that should go here are e.g. "How should I romanize this sound?" and "What do you think about my phonology?"
(Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here [2010-2020]
(Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here [2010-2020]
This thread is for quick questions related to the forum topic; Post your question and hopefully receive an answer here.
Examples of questions that should go here are e.g. "How should I romanize this sound?" and "What do you think about my phonology?"
Examples of questions that should go here are e.g. "How should I romanize this sound?" and "What do you think about my phonology?"
Edit: Continued in this thread. -Aevas, 2020-09-06
Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
I'll go first
Aentoui only has three stops: /b/, /t/, /k/. Is it really that weird if I have /b/ and not /p/, with /b/ being the only voiced stop in the set?
Full info on the conlang can be found inthis thread that posted here as well.
Aentoui only has three stops: /b/, /t/, /k/. Is it really that weird if I have /b/ and not /p/, with /b/ being the only voiced stop in the set?
Full info on the conlang can be found inthis thread that posted here as well.
(in order of proficiency from greatest to least)
Native | Fluent :tgl: | Learning · · :zho: · :qbc: | Want to learn · ·
Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
It's not really weird, it is well attested on Earth. Look at Arabic or Berber languages. Some American language also has it. Your consonant inventory is reallistic IMHO.Ilaeriu wrote:Aentoui only has three stops: /b/, /t/, /k/. Is it really that weird if I have /b/ and not /p/, with /b/ being the only voiced stop in the set?
I read somewhere that it has a phonetic reason and /b/ is more contrastive or what. You may find something on Wikipedia. Having /g/ but no /k/ does not happen OTOH, missing /g/ while contrasting all other stops in voicing is common. For example Czech, the language I speak, has lenited /g/ into /h\/ and /g/ occurs almost exclusively in loanwords (not talking about [g] occuring as an allophone of /k/). Voiced stops futher back in the throat (uvular) are difficult and rare - many (perhaps most) languages with /q/ do not have /G\/.
Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Ah, okay, thanks! Good to know.
I agree, for some reason /b/ /t/ /k/ just feels much more natural to me than having /g/ in there as well.
I agree, for some reason /b/ /t/ /k/ just feels much more natural to me than having /g/ in there as well.
(in order of proficiency from greatest to least)
Native | Fluent :tgl: | Learning · · :zho: · :qbc: | Want to learn · ·
Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
I have a question:
How come the finnish final /n/ is often pronounced as /h/?
I've been listening to some finnish musics and I hear alot of final -n said as /h/.
Is it a rule or is it just the singer?
How come the finnish final /n/ is often pronounced as /h/?
I've been listening to some finnish musics and I hear alot of final -n said as /h/.
Is it a rule or is it just the singer?
Fluent: | Learning: :tgl:
Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
/b t k/ isn't that weird tho I will dispute that Arabic has that since it does have more voiced stops and the question concluded with
Rebooting, again, I be looking for some feedback on any so-far bad parts like conflicting phonological processes, wonky allophony, stupid gaps in inventory, whathaveyou. I've cut out the lists of not yet existent minimal pairs and am aware that the diacritic for syllabic consonants didn't show up properly (and so has been removed because it was making the consonant letters invisible).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------with /b/ being the only voiced stop in the set:
Rebooting, again, I be looking for some feedback on any so-far bad parts like conflicting phonological processes, wonky allophony, stupid gaps in inventory, whathaveyou. I've cut out the lists of not yet existent minimal pairs and am aware that the diacritic for syllabic consonants didn't show up properly (and so has been removed because it was making the consonant letters invisible).
Ways to flesh it out would be good because this is quite frankly piddly in length.2. Phonology and Orthography
2.1 Phoneme inventory
- has both fairly large inventory of consonants and a small inventory of vowels.
2.1.1. Consonants
The phonemic pulmonic consonants are listed in the following table.
Bilabial Alveolar Post-alveolar Palatal Velar Uvular Pharyngeal Glottal
central lateral Plain Labial Plain Plain Labial
Plosive Ejective /tʼ cʼ kʼ qʼ qʷʼ/
Aspirated /tʰ cʰ kʰ qʰ qʷʰ/
Plain /t c k q qʷ ʔ ʔʷ/
Affricate Ejective /t͡sʼ t͡ɬʼ t͡ʃʼ/
Plain /t͡s t͡ɬ t͡ʃ/
Fricative /s ɬ ʃ x χ χʷ ʕ h hʷ/
Nasal /m n ɲ ɴ/
Approximant /l j w ʁ ʁʷ/
2.1.2. Vowels
The phonemic vowels are listed in the following table.
Front Center Back
Close i ɨ u
Close-mid ə
open a
2.2. Minimal Pairs of Consonants
2.2.1. Consonant Minimal Pairs
The consonant minimal pairs are as follows.
2.2.2. Minimal Pairs of Vowels
All five vowel phonemes have at least one minimal pair with other vowels.
2.3. Allophony
There is minimal allophony.
2.3.1. Consonant Allophones
The - consonants have - allophony.
The palatal plosives are allophones of the velar plosives before, and only before, /i/.
The labialized uvulars are allophones of the plain uvulars before, and only before, /u/.
[ɴʷ] is an allophone of /ɴ/ before /u/.
The labialized glottals are allophones of the plain glottals before, and only before, /u/.
Syllabic nasals /m̩ n̩ ɲ ɴ̩ɴ/ are allophones of nonsyllabic nasals /m̩ n̩ ɲ ̩ɴ/ when nonadjecent to vowels.
Syllabic approximants /l̩ ʁ ʁʁ̩ʷ/ are allophones of nonsyllabic approximants /l ʁ ʁʷ/ when nonadjecent to vowels. The approximants /j w/ only become /i u/ in stressed syllables; otherwise, an epenthetic /ɨ/ is inserted before or after them.
[p] is an allophone of /ʔʷ/ before /u/.
[ç] is an allophone of /h/ before /i/.
2.3.2. Vowel Allophones
Vowels have minimal allophony, mostly concerning the high vowels.
All vowels have pharyngealized allophones in words with at least one pharyngeal consonant: [iˤ ɨˤ uˤ əˤ aˤ].
[ɑ] is an allophone of /a/ before nasal or uvular onsets.
[o] is an allophone of /a/ after /m/ labialized consonants.
Some expected allophony doesn't occur.
Vowels aren't nasalized before or after nasals.
2.4. Phonological Constraints
The basic syllable structure is C(C)V(C), with mandatory onsets and nucleuses and optional codas.
2.4.1. Onsets
Any single consonant is permitted as an onset: /m tʼ tʰ t t͡sʼ t͡s s n t͡ɬʼ t͡ɬ ɬ l t͡ʃʼ t͡ʃ ʃ cʼ cʰ c ɲ j kʼ kʰ k x w qʼ qʰ q χ ɴ ʁ̞ qʷʼ qʷʰ qʷ χʷ ʁ̞ʷ ʔ h ʔʷ hʷ/. Clusters in the onset are limited to a single plosive (excluding /ʔ/) followed by a single approximant.
2.4.2. Nucleuses
Any single vowel, syllabic nasal or approximant is permitted as a nucleus: /i ɨ u ə a m̩ n̩ ɲ̩ ɴ̩ l̩ ʁ̩ ʁ̩ʷ/. There are no diphthongs.
2.4.3. Codas
Any single consonant is permitted as an optional coda.
2.5. Phonological Processes
2.5.1. Consonant processes
There are minimal consonant processes.
2.5.1.1. Aspirated Stop Dissimilation
There may not be two adjecent syllables with aspirated stops. The first such syllable will dissimilate to simple plosives.
2.5.1.2. Notable Absent Processes
2.5.1.2.1. Nasal Place Assimilation
Nasal consonants as a coda don't assimilate to the place of articulation of preceding onsets. Ex: kanpa > kanpa
2.5.2. Vowel Processes
There are minor vowel processes.
2.5.2.1. Vowel Reduction
High vowels in unstressed syllables reduce to /ɨ/.
2.5.2.2. Syncope
The first of two consecutive and nonidentical vowels is elided, with labialization if possible before elided /u/. Ex: t͡ʃʼəqʼu + ansɨ > t͡ʃʼəqʷʼansɨ.
/ə/ is always elided where it would produce syllabic nasals or approximants. Ex: mət͡ʃʼəmqʷʼa > mt͡ʃʼʼmqʷʼa
/ə/ is always elided in syllables before other morphemes when it wouldn't violate phonotactics. Ex: t͡ɬʼiχə + ca > t͡ɬʼiχca
2.5.3. Consonant Vowel Harmony
Vowels become pharyngealized in words with at least one pharyngeal consonant /ʕ/. Ex: tinə + ʕaˤɬ > tiˤnʕaˤɬ
In words without a pharyngeal consonant, no vowels are pharyngealized.
2.5.4. Epenthesis
The default epenthetic vowel is /ə/.
Epenthesis doesn't occur between simple stops and glottal stops; the glottal stop drops out and the simple stop is replaced with the ejective equivalent. Ex: sətʔ > sətʼ
2.6. Prosody
2.6.1. Stress
Primary stress occurs contrastively only on a root syllable. Secondary stress occurs every two syllables to the right after that.
Neither /ɨ/ or /ə/ are ever stressed. If stress would fall on such a syllable, it moves to the syllable with /a/ nearest the root.
2.6.2. Length
2.6.2.1. Consonant gemination
2.6.2.2. Vowel length
Three of the vowels have distinctive long counterparts, short /i u a/ as compared to long /iː uː aː/.
2.7. Transcription
All affixes listed in the grammar and syntax sections will be in IPA.
2.7.1. Phoneme Inventory
2.7.1.1. Consonants
Bilabial Alveolar Post-alveolar Palatal Velar Uvular Pharyngeal Glottal
Central Lateral Plain Labial Plain Plain Labial
Plosive Ejective <tʼ çʼ kʼ qʼ qʷʼ>
Aspirated <tʰ çʰ kʰ qʰ qʷʰ>
Simple <t ç k q qʷ ʔ ʔʷ>
Affricate Ejective <cʼ ƛʼ čʼ>
Simple <c ƛ č>
Fricative <s ł š x ẋ ẋʷ ʕ h hʷ>
Nasal <m n ñ ṅ>
Approximant <l y w r rʷ>
2.7.1.2. Vowels
Front Central Back
Close i ɨ u
Close-mid ə
open a
Pharyngealization of vowels is unwritten as it's merely a phonetic detail.
2.7.2. Prosody
2.7.2.1. Stress
Stress is differentiated in writing by the use or absence of an acute diacritic for the unpredictably stressed syllables. It isn't added to <i> or <u>, which are already stressed, or to <ɨ> or <ə>, which are never stressed.
short long
unstressed a a
stressed á áá
2.7.2.1.1. Vowel Length
Long vowels are differentiated from short vowels in writing by the use of doubling of vowel letters for long vowels.
- InquisitorJL
- hieroglyphic
- Posts: 29
- Joined: 12 Aug 2010 02:08
- Location: United Kingdom
Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Quick romanisation question...
I've got this consonant phoneme inventory
Aspirated Plosives /pʰ tʰ kʰ qʰ/ <ph th kh qh>
Plosives /p b t d k q/ <p b t d k q>
Affricates /ʨ ʤ/ <ti di>
Fricatives /f v s z ɕ ʑ x ʁ h/ <f v s z si zi ȝ* g h>
Nasals /m n ɲ ŋ/ <m n ni nk>
Approximants /ɹ j/ <r i>
Laterals /l ʎ/ <l li>
I really don't like using <x> for /x/, I just don't like how it looks. I'm considering using <ȝ> but that doesn't seem to fit the rest of the romanisation either. What other alternatives are there for romanising /x/?
I've got this consonant phoneme inventory
Aspirated Plosives /pʰ tʰ kʰ qʰ/ <ph th kh qh>
Plosives /p b t d k q/ <p b t d k q>
Affricates /ʨ ʤ/ <ti di>
Fricatives /f v s z ɕ ʑ x ʁ h/ <f v s z si zi ȝ* g h>
Nasals /m n ɲ ŋ/ <m n ni nk>
Approximants /ɹ j/ <r i>
Laterals /l ʎ/ <l li>
I really don't like using <x> for /x/, I just don't like how it looks. I'm considering using <ȝ> but that doesn't seem to fit the rest of the romanisation either. What other alternatives are there for romanising /x/?
- rickardspaghetti
- roman
- Posts: 898
- Joined: 12 Aug 2010 04:26
Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Perhaps <ch>?
そうだ。死んでいる人も勃起することが出来る。
俺はその証だ。
:vgtl:
俺はその証だ。
Spoiler:
- Itsuki Kohaku
- sinic
- Posts: 238
- Joined: 12 Aug 2010 02:36
- Location: Antwerpen, België
Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
ð, A bunch of various digraphes.
Orthography doesn't have to resemble Western ones.
Orthography doesn't have to resemble Western ones.
In order of knowledge: :zho: :eus:
Conlangs: Literary Makurungou, Common Makurungou
Conlangs: Literary Makurungou, Common Makurungou
-
- MVP
- Posts: 1686
- Joined: 15 Aug 2010 20:03
- Location: California
- Contact:
Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
<ḫ>? <ḥ>? <ch> (seconded)?
Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
InquisitorJL wrote:Quick romanisation question...
I've got this consonant phoneme inventory
Aspirated Plosives /pʰ tʰ kʰ qʰ/ <ph th kh qh>
Plosives /p b t d k q/ <p b t d k q>
Affricates /ʨ ʤ/ <ti di>
Fricatives /f v s z ɕ ʑ x ʁ h/ <f v s z si zi ȝ* g h>
Nasals /m n ɲ ŋ/ <m n ni nk>
Approximants /ɹ j/ <r i>
Laterals /l ʎ/ <l li>
I really don't like using <x> for /x/, I just don't like how it looks. I'm considering using <ȝ> but that doesn't seem to fit the rest of the romanisation either. What other alternatives are there for romanising /x/?
Well, you're not currently using <j> which would fall in line with Spanish orthography and since it's a romanisation can we assume this will not regularly be used by native speakers of the language (since romanisations by definition are the representation of another writing system using "latin" letters)?
Alternatively you could use <ch> or, possibly through simplifaction of an older romanisation which used <ch>, you could use <c>, with the old <h> element of the digraph falling out of use with a possible rule emerging that <h> in digraphs is reserved for marking aspiration.
You can tell the same lie a thousand times,
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
- InquisitorJL
- hieroglyphic
- Posts: 29
- Joined: 12 Aug 2010 02:08
- Location: United Kingdom
Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Thanks for the responses. I think I'll go with <ch>, or maybe just <c>, though as sangi pointed out it's not that important. I'm not sure whether this is going to be a stand along language, or if I'm gonna use it as a proto lang but either way they aren't actually going to be using the latin alphabet.
Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Like Imploder said, it is not that uncommon, though usually a language has something to make up for it. For example in Arabic historical /p/ lenited into /f/. Similar things have happened in other languages with /b/ and /f/, but no /p/.Ilaeriu wrote:Aentoui only has three stops: /b/, /t/, /k/. Is it really that weird if I have /b/ and not /p/, with /b/ being the only voiced stop in the set?
In Önge there is a voiced and voiceless labial stop, but the voiceless one is actually labiovelar. So you have /b/ and /kʷ/, but no /p/ or /f/.
You can just not have /p/ and get away with it, but maybe it would be intresting to think about how this reasonably uncommon phenomenon came into being in your conlang? :-P
I think there is a claim that Pirahã has /g/ but no /k/, but it's quite dubious. Somebody claimed [k] is an optional realization of /hi/. 8-)imploder wrote:I read somewhere that it has a phonetic reason and /b/ is more contrastive or what. You may find something on Wikipedia. Having /g/ but no /k/ does not happen OTOH, missing /g/ while contrasting all other stops in voicing is common. For example Czech, the language I speak, has lenited /g/ into /h\/ and /g/ occurs almost exclusively in loanwords (not talking about [g] occuring as an allophone of /k/). Voiced stops futher back in the throat (uvular) are difficult and rare - many (perhaps most) languages with /q/ do not have /G\/.
There are indeed many languages that have /q/ but no /ɢ/, but there are also languages with /ɢ/ and no /q/. For instance Persian.
Many languages have /k/ but not /g/, that is indeed true. It makes a lot of sense what you're saying about /b/ and /g/.
Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Ah, I have /f/. I'll say that my conlang is in a similar position as Arabic, then. How convenient. Thanks!Wanderer wrote:Like Imploder said, it is not that uncommon, though usually a language has something to make up for it. For example in Arabic historical /p/ lenited into /f/. Similar things have happened in other languages with /b/ and /f/, but no /p/.Ilaeriu wrote:Aentoui only has three stops: /b/, /t/, /k/. Is it really that weird if I have /b/ and not /p/, with /b/ being the only voiced stop in the set?
In Önge there is a voiced and voiceless labial stop, but the voiceless one is actually labiovelar. So you have /b/ and /kʷ/, but no /p/ or /f/.
You can just not have /p/ and get away with it, but maybe it would be intresting to think about how this reasonably uncommon phenomenon came into being in your conlang? :-P
(in order of proficiency from greatest to least)
Native | Fluent :tgl: | Learning · · :zho: · :qbc: | Want to learn · ·
Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
As other said, this is not uncommom, it is much more realistic than a language with /p b t d k g/.Ilaeriu wrote:I'll go first
Aentoui only has three stops: /b/, /t/, /k/. Is it really that weird if I have /b/ and not /p/, with /b/ being the only voiced stop in the set?
Full info on the conlang can be found inthis thread that posted here as well.
This makes your conlang much more realistic than alot of others. One of my conlangs (I can't really says its a conlang, i just made a phoneme inventory xD) had /p t d k/, having only one voiced stop.
Fluent: | Learning: :tgl:
Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
I can haz feedback at least on this one orthography question? Since <c> is already reserved for /t͡ʃ/, should I be using <ç> as a a base for the palatal plosives or <ċ>?
Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
I would probably of used <ç> for /t͡ʃ/ and <c> for /c/MrKrov wrote:I can haz feedback at least on this one orthography question? Since <c> is already reserved for /t͡ʃ/, should I be using <ç> as a a base for the palatal plosives or <ċ>?
You should ask yourself ONE question: "How would an english speaker pronounce this?"
With this question you can avoid sounds with weird letters assignations. (like for example <x> for /r/)
Fluent: | Learning: :tgl:
Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
I'd say this might be better answered by seeing the rest of the phoneme inventory and possibly some hisotry behind the 'lang if any exists.MrKrov wrote:I can haz feedback at least on this one orthography question? Since <c> is already reserved for /t͡ʃ/, should I be using <ç> as a a base for the palatal plosives or <ċ>?
You can tell the same lie a thousand times,
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
...I posted it on the previous page. It's more or less still accurate. And I blundered; I'm using <c> for <ts> and <č> for <tʃ>.
Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Ah yes, I was meant to ask about that. You say "the palatal plosives are allophones of the velar plosives before, and only before, /i/". Does this mean that palatal plosives are only allophones or that the velars merge with the palatals before /i/? If it's the former then, using a phonemic script, you wouldn't actually need a distinct graphemes for palatals. However, if it's the former or you were aiming for a phonetic script then personally I think <ç> works perfectly fine for the palatal plosive. However, you could also use <z> for /ts/ following German orthography and mark /c/ using <c> and keep <č> for /tʃ/ :)MrKrov wrote:...I posted it on the previous page. It's more or less still accurate. And I blundered; I'm using <c> for <ts> and <č> for <tʃ>.
Oh, and this is just me, but I think <l> might do well for /ɬ/. Just simpler methinks :)
You can tell the same lie a thousand times,
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.