Dormouse559 wrote: ↑
I have locked this thread. Oligey, perhaps you should take some time to cool off and get a sense of the people here on the CBB and their interests. Then, if you want to make a new thread, you should choose a topic that doesn’t involve you enforcing prerequisites. It evidently leads to more frustrating back-and-forth over qualifications than it does productive conversation.
And yet this new thread is even less civil-seeming than that one.
No language is superior to another, and arguing that one's language ─ or any language ─ is better than someone else's is incredibly ego-/ethnocentric. I'm surprised that you came back this soon ─ less than twenty-four hours ─ with such a similar, and yet so much worse worded, argument.
I assume this will get locked very quickly, but I wanted to say that anyway.
As I said on the other thread: you'd be a good auxlanger.
Edit since Khemehekis posted:
Khemehekis wrote: ↑01 Jan 2024 05:22
What about
Bōlán? That's borrowed. Or
àizībìng.
Now, Navajo, that's a REAL non-borrower.
Absolutely! Navajo practically uses its native roots ─ it certainly hasn't taken any international loanwords, though some ancient words might have origins in other languages ─ for everything.