Fortunatian Scratchpad

A forum for all topics related to constructed languages
Post Reply
Esneirra973
sinic
sinic
Posts: 336
Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05

Fortunatian Scratchpad

Post by Esneirra973 »

This language is inspired by a previous thread I saw here, in which one user tried to design a Finnic language with the smallest phonology possible. I thought it would be interesting to do the same with Celtic languages. I figured it would be an interesting departure from what is observed among the currently surviving Celtic languages, such as Welsh and Irish, that are known for their consonant mutations and phonological innovations. Fortunatian also takes inspiration from Oceanic and Polynesian languages, which are known for their smaller phonemic inventories. The setting for Fortunatian would be the High Middle Ages, and I hope to evolve it into a few daughter languages in the future.

Fortunatian, or Galeco, was a Q-Celtic language spoken throughout the Fortunate Isles1 in the centuries following the fall of the Roman Empire. It was first spread by speakers of Gallaecian who fled after the Roman conquest of northwestern Iberia. They first established themselves in Loicos2, and then expanded outward to several other islands. Written attestations of Fortunatian have been found as far as Cape Verde, where a descendant of the language is still spoken. During the reign of Trajan, several expeditions were sent to Loicos, Neveira3, Llaneja4, and other islands. They were quickly subdued, and incorporated into the Roman Empire as the Fortunate Isles (Latin: Insulae Fortunatae). Due to their distance from the economically prosperous regions of the Roman Empire, not much effort was undertaken to Romanize the pre-existing population. As such, they remained predominantly Celtic-speaking. Those who lived in the Canary Islands coexisted with the Guanches who had already been living there, being influenced by their language & culture as a result. (I want to create a minimalistic descendant of the Guanche language in the same setting. This idea was inspired by my readings on Silbo Gomero, the whistled language spoken on the Canary Islands. Certain people hypothesize that the Guanche language must have had a smaller phonemic inventory due to the limitations of this method of speech, so I’d like to look into that further.)

After the fall of the Roman Empire, the existence of the Fortunate Isles was largely forgotten by the major political powers of Europe, although there was still limited contact between the Isles and Atlantic merchants. As such, the inhabitants of the Fortunate Isles developed independently from their Celtic and Iberian brethren. Given their relative isolation from the rest of the Roman world, the region still maintained religious diversity, being home to adherents of Christianity as well as the Celtic and Guanche pantheons. Fortunatian, as it came to be known, was at its peak between 800 and 1100 AD. By this point, it had experienced a severe reduction in its phonemes, only having 13 consonants and 5 vowels. There are certainly smaller phonologies out there, but I plan to reduce them further when developing the descendants of Fortunatian.

Phonemic Inventory and Orthography

Fortunatian was most commonly written in the Latin script, but the usage of Tifinagh was also seen in the Canary Islands. Both are demonstrated below with the same example sentence.

/m n ŋ/ <m n ng>
/p t k/ <p t c~qu>
/ɸ θ s x/ <f z s g>
/r j w/ <r i~d v~u~b>
/i u e o a/ <i u e o a>

/m n ŋ/ <ⵎ ⵏ ⴳ>
/p t k/ <ⵇ ⵜ ⴽ>
/ɸ θ s x/ <ⴼ ⵝ ⵙ ⵅ>
/r j w/ <ⵕ ⵢ ⵡ>
/i u e o a/ <ⵉ ⵓ ⴻ ⵄ ⴰ>

Toi ti cumes o sin viri.
ⵜⵄⵉ ⵜⵕⵉ ⴽⵓⵎⴻⵙ ⵄ ⵙⵉⵏ ⵡⵉⵕⵉ.
be-3S.PRES.IND three dog-MASC.OBL.PLU at DEF man-MASC.NOM.PLU
The man owns three dogs. (Three dogs are at the man.)

Diachronic History:

Proto-Celtic to Gallaecian
Spoiler:
/ɸ/ > /∅/
/xs xt/ > /s t/
/-mnV-/ > /-wnV-/
/g/ > /∅/ | between vowels (if one of them is /i(ː)/ or /e(ː)/)
/lw rw/ > /lβ rβ/
Gallaecian to Fortunatian
Spoiler:
Latinate Shifts
/k g/ > /c ɟ/ | before front vowels
/kj gj/ > /c ɟ/
/kʷ gʷ/ > /k g/ | before front vowels
/kʷ gʷ/ > /p b/
/x/ > /∅/
/c ɟ/ > /t͡s d͡z/

Long Vowel Shift
/iː uː/ > /ai au/
/eː oː aː/ > /i u o/

Weakening of Plosive Sounds
/nk ng/ > /ŋ/
/nt nd/ > /n/
/mp mb/ > /m/
/b d d͡z g/ > /β ð z ɣ/
/sβ sð sɣ/ > /sp st sk/

Reduction of Semivowels
/mw nw ŋw/ > /m m w/
/pw tw kw/ > /p/
/βw ðw sw zw ɣw/ > /w w ɸ β w/
/mj nj ŋj/ > /ɲ/
/pj tj/ > /β t͡s/
/βj ðj sj ɣj/ > /β j j j/
/rj lj/ > /z t͡s/
/w/ > /β/
/j/ > /z/ | #_
/oi ai ou au/ > /i e u o/

Simplification of Consonant Clusters
/sm sn/ > /m n/
/sp st sk/ > /s ts ks/ > /s t͡s t͡s/
/sr sl/ > /r l/

Loss of Voiced Consonants
/ɣ/ > /x/
/t͡s/ > /θ/
/β/ > /w/
/ð/ > /j/
/z/ > /r/

Development and Loss of Nasal Vowels
/ɲV/ > /jṼ/
/VN/ > /Ṽ/ | _[C#]
/l/ > /r/ | in consonant clusters
/l/ > /n/
/ɲ/ > /j/
/ĩ ũ ẽ õ ã/ > /in um en om an/ | _V
/ĩ ũ ẽ õ ã/ > /i u e o a/
/V/ > /∅/ | unstressed syllables

Outcome of /r/ in Consonant Clusters
Initially:
/mr/ > /mj/
/pr tr kr/ > /t tj kj/
/xr/ > /x/
/jr wr/ > /r/

Otherwise:
/mr nr ŋr/ > /mj nj ŋj/
/pr tr kr/ > /t tj kj/
/xr/ > /r/
/jr wr/ > /rj rw/
Notes:
1. Here, the Fortunate Isles refers to the Canary Islands and the Azores.
2. ATL Madeira. The name Loicos is derived from the phrase Nezi Loicos "Isle of Loico", from the Gallaecian phrase **Enistī Lugudekos "Island of Lugudes". In Latin, it was called Insula Lu(g)udeci.
3. ATL Tenerife. It is derived from the Latin name for the island (Nivaria).
4. ATL Fuerteventura. It is derived from the Latin name for the island (Planasia).
Last edited by Esneirra973 on 18 May 2024 19:30, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Arayaz
mayan
mayan
Posts: 2163
Joined: 07 Sep 2022 00:24

Re: Fortunatian Scratchpad

Post by Arayaz »

Nice. I enjoy Celtic languages, so this is fun! Awaiting more.
hayikesk h Hatsune Miku hïvakïtasęmayes · my thread · sep 6 gang ftw · i use she/her ^^
User avatar
WeepingElf
greek
greek
Posts: 711
Joined: 23 Feb 2016 18:42
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Contact:

Re: Fortunatian Scratchpad

Post by WeepingElf »

Arayaz wrote: 17 May 2024 21:23 Nice. I enjoy Celtic languages, so this is fun! Awaiting more.
Seconded.
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf
My conlang pages
Yrgidrámamintih!
Esneirra973
sinic
sinic
Posts: 336
Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05

Re: Fortunatian Scratchpad

Post by Esneirra973 »

Fortunatian was a predominantly VSO language, a feature one could liken to other Q-Celtic languages (such as Old Irish). In the centuries after the Gallaecian migrations to the Fortunate Isles, the language underwent a great deal of changes in syntax. Like many other languages in Western Europe, it trended towards simplicity and analytic grammar structures. This can be seen in the limited set of pronouns observed in Fortunatian.

Personal Pronouns

Like all other Celtic languages, Fortunatian at least distinguished between first, second, and third person. What sets it apart from its closest brethren is the complete collapse of the gendered distinction among its third person pronouns. Given that the oblique and genitive forms of the masculine and neuter pronouns had already become mostly identical in the early stages of the language, I did not think this to be much of a stretch.

First Sing. Nom/Obl/Gen: me/me/mene
Second Sing. Nom/Obl/Gen: to/tu/tuve
Third Sing. Nom/Obl/Gen: se/em/eio
First Plu. Nom/Obl/Gen: nes/nos/aro (*asero)
Second Plu. Nom/Obl/Gen: fes/fes/fero (*fesero)
Third Plu. Nom/Obl/Gen: ies/sos/eso

Demonstratives

The demonstratives are also unique in the sense that they have a three-way distinction for distance, similar to Iberian Romance languages like Spanish. There is also a relative pronoun ro, from Proto-Celtic *yo-.

Proximal Masc/Fem: so/sa
Distal Masc/Fem: sino/sina
Distant Masc/Fem: ian/iana (from *sinodal~sinoial, from an earlier phrase *sino tal, of which the etymology is unknown. The word *tal is believed to be related to the Old Irish tall, and *sino must be related to the definite article sin.)

Articles

Indef. Masc/Fem: e/ia (plural forms are irregular eni and ias)
Def. Masc/Fem: sin/sina (plural forms are irregular sini and sinas)

Although the articles have certain irregularities, the previously mentioned demonstratives all decline like regular nouns. For example, one could say so meiu “this mead”, or si muzoqui “the children”. The word muzoco is of obscure origin, with some speculating a derivation from the Proto-Celtic word *mustākos.

Noun and Adjective Declensions

Nouns and adjectives can end in any vowel or a consonant. As such, there are different means of declining them depending on the phonemes they end with. Regardless of their final phonemes, nouns can take on a masculine or feminine gender. Under influence from Vulgar Latin, the neuter gender largely died out. The case system has also disappeared, but vestiges of the oblique and genitive cases still remain in local place names (with Loicos being perhaps the most notable example!)

o-stem Sing/Plu: -o/i
a-stem Sing/Plu: -a/as
i-stem Sing/Plu: -i/is
u-stem Sing/Plu: -u/us
e-stem Sing/Plu: -e/is

Consonant stems are a bit more complicated since they preserve irregularities that were already present in Proto-Celtic, and exacerbated by the sound changes that occurred in Gallaecian. Perhaps the most notable example of this is the word re “king”, which has the plural form reges “kings”.

general C-stem Sing/Plu: -C/Ces
g-stem Sing/Plu: -0/ges

There are also two types of nasal stems whose declensions will be demonstrated with example words. The first derives from nouns that had lost their coda-position nasal consonant in singular form, but retained it in plural form. The second derives from nouns ending in *-nts, which have now grown in irregularity.

n-stem type I Sing/Plu: cu/cumes (from Proto-Celtic *kū “dog”)
n-stem type II Sing/Plu: cara/caranes (from Proto-Celtic *karants “friend”)

All other nouns ending in consonants fall under the general C-stem declension. As such, the words atir “father”, roit “druid”, and nut “nephew” are pluralized as atires, roites, and nutes respectively.

Comparative and Superlative Adjectives

Much like other Celtic languages, Fortunatian also exhibits comparative and superlative adjectives, formed with various suffixes. Comparative adjectives are typically formed with -io, although there are some exceptions which are formed with -e instead. For example, one could say seno "old" and senio "older", but also nitano "wide" and nitane "wider". All superlative adjectives are formed with -sao (or -isao if the noun stem ends in a consonant besides -s-). The previously mentioned adjectives would become senisao "oldest" and nitanisao "widest" under this system. Once I have the time, I will make a post discussing the verb conjugations of Fortunatian.
User avatar
WeepingElf
greek
greek
Posts: 711
Joined: 23 Feb 2016 18:42
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Contact:

Re: Fortunatian Scratchpad

Post by WeepingElf »

Esneirra973 wrote: 18 May 2024 14:48 Fortunatian was a predominantly VSO language, a feature one could liken to other Q-Celtic languages (such as Old Irish).
Does it show other Insular Celtic traits, such as initial mutations, absolute vs.conjunct verb inflection or "conjugated prepositions" as well, or does it avoid these, being technically a Continental Celtic language?
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf
My conlang pages
Yrgidrámamintih!
Esneirra973
sinic
sinic
Posts: 336
Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05

Re: Fortunatian Scratchpad

Post by Esneirra973 »

WeepingElf wrote: 18 May 2024 17:21
Esneirra973 wrote: 18 May 2024 14:48 Fortunatian was a predominantly VSO language, a feature one could liken to other Q-Celtic languages (such as Old Irish).
Does it show other Insular Celtic traits, such as initial mutations, absolute vs.conjunct verb inflection or "conjugated prepositions" as well, or does it avoid these, being technically a Continental Celtic language?
Besides word order, it does not have any of these features. I figured these would be innovations reserved for Celtic languages spoken in the British Isles, given their geographical distance from the Iberian Peninsula and the fact that the speakers of Fortunatian would have mostly interacted with groups of people who did not have these features in their languages.
User avatar
WeepingElf
greek
greek
Posts: 711
Joined: 23 Feb 2016 18:42
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Contact:

Re: Fortunatian Scratchpad

Post by WeepingElf »

Esneirra973 wrote: 18 May 2024 17:42
WeepingElf wrote: 18 May 2024 17:21
Esneirra973 wrote: 18 May 2024 14:48 Fortunatian was a predominantly VSO language, a feature one could liken to other Q-Celtic languages (such as Old Irish).
Does it show other Insular Celtic traits, such as initial mutations, absolute vs.conjunct verb inflection or "conjugated prepositions" as well, or does it avoid these, being technically a Continental Celtic language?
Besides word order, it does not have any of these features. I figured these would be innovations reserved for Celtic languages spoken in the British Isles, given their geographical distance from the Iberian Peninsula and the fact that the speakers of Fortunatian would have mostly interacted with groups of people who did not have these features in their languages.
Actually, I am relieved reading this. My objection against Arvorec is that despite purporting to be a Continental Celtic language, it looks like an Insular one (though it is otherwise very finely crafted, by someone who ḱnows Celtic very well; and one may concede that it is at least located close enough to the British Isles to be affected by whatever caused the Insular Celtic languages to develop those features). I have ideas for two Continental Celtic conlangs myself neither of which will show any of those features (alas, I am not currently working on them as I have enough other stuff to wrap my mind around). Of course, it is anyone's guess into which direction Continental Celtic languages would have developed if any had survived; but the (mostly Romance) languages that replaced them do not show anything like that (though the Western Romance languages have lenitions very similar to the Brythonic ones, but with the key difference that they do not transgress word boundaries), so the guess is at least plausible that they would never have evolved those features, either; and those who build modern Continental Celtic languages that resemble Insular Celtic ones miss an opportunity to make something that is different in interesting ways from what we have.
Last edited by WeepingElf on 18 May 2024 22:17, edited 2 times in total.
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf
My conlang pages
Yrgidrámamintih!
Esneirra973
sinic
sinic
Posts: 336
Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05

Re: Fortunatian Scratchpad

Post by Esneirra973 »

Syntax

Developing the syntax and grammatical rules of Fortunatian was, admittedly, a tough endeavor. The surviving corpus of Celtic languages varies wildly in terms of divergent verb systems and grammatical trends. As such, I was not sure what direction to take this in. Following my previous comments on analytical trends and the establishment of a VSO word order, I decided to simplify the grammar while also devising a few key innovations, taking influence from changes that occurred in other Q-Celtic languages as well as the adjacent Romance languages spoken in Iberia. Here are some key characteristics of Fortunatian syntax that I have established beforehand.
  • VSO word order (somewhat flexible, not rigid)
  • Nominative-Accusative
  • Nouns only decline for number, not case (as shown before)
  • Verbs conjugate for 3 persons (first, second, third), 2 numbers (singular and plural), 3 tenses (past, present, future), and 3 moods (indicative, subjunctive, imperative)
  • Direct object pronouns precede the verb that affects them.
  • Numbers precede the nouns they affect. (ex. ti atares gurmi "three blue birds")
  • Possessive pronouns and adjectives succeed the nouns they affect. (ex. Tez e tecan1 gaz o cu mene. "My dog has a green toy."
Emphasis

Much like Old Irish, Fortunatian also exhibits a series of suffixes meant to emphasize the subject or object of a verb. However, they are derived from the pronouns themselves, and there are distinct suffixes depending on whether one wishes to emphasize the subject or the object of a verb. Each suffix also has different forms depending on whether the final phoneme of a word is a consonant or a vowel, and they are usually attached at the end of the verb.

Subject Suffixes:
First Sing. C/V: -im/mi
Second Sing. C/V: -ot/to
Third Sing. C/V: -es/se
First Plu. C/V: -ene/ne
Second Plu. C/V: -evi/vi
Third Plu. C/V: -is/ies

Object Suffixes:
First Sing. C/V: -em/me
Second Sing. C/V: -ut/tu
Third Sing. C/V: -ei/sem
First Plu. C/V: -ono/no
Second Plu. C/V: -eve/ve
Third Plu. C/V: -os/sos

Here is an example of the same sentence, but with emphasis placed on different subjects.

Quinatome me sin avan.
He bought me the apple.

Quinatose me sin avan.
He bought me the apple.

Quinatosem me sin avan.
He bought me the apple.

Possession

Although genitive pronouns are sufficient to describe possession within a singular noun phrase, it is necessary to employ other means when speaking in full sentences. Like other Celtic languages, Fortunatian did not have a single verb meaning "to have". Rather, if one wished to express their ownership of an object, they would have to use the following construction.

tiz "to be" + object (that which is owned) + o "at" + subject (owner)

Fortunatian also makes a distinction between inalienable and alienable possession through the use of prepositions. Ordinarily, the construction above and the typical combination of object and possessor pronoun are reserved for inalienable possession (as well as contexts where alienable possession is obvious). However, the preposition ves "away, away from" can be inserted to emphasize alienable possession in the following constructions.

object (that which is owned) + o "at" + ves "away, away from" + subject pronoun

tiz "to be" object (that which is owned) + o "at" + ves "away, away from" + subject (owner)

If one were to apply this distinction to a particular example, it would appear as follows.

Amet nomas ei.
He washed his hands. (He washed his own hands.)

Amet nomas o ves se.
He washed his hands. (He washed the hands of another person.)

Verbs

Verb conjugations in Fortunatian followed a relatively simple paradigm, not unlike other languages in Western Europe. Regular verb conjugations will be demonstrated with the example verb verez "to bear". Regular verbs can have infinitives ending in -az, -ez, or -iz.

verez "to bear"
Spoiler:
Present Ind.
First Sing: vero
Second Sing: veres
Third Sing: veret
First Plu: veros
Second Plu: veriz
Third Plu: veroi

Past Ind.
First Sing: verema
Second Sing: vereta
Third Sing: vereto
First Plu: veremo
Second Plu: vereze
Third Plu: vereno

Fut Ind.2
First Sing: vereio
Second Sing: vereies
Third Sing: vereiet
First Plu: vereios
Second Plu: vereiz
Third Plu: vereioi

Present Subj.
First Sing: veraso
Second Sing: verases
Third Sing: veraset
First Plu: verasos
Second Plu: verasiz
Third Plu: verasoi

Past Subj.
First Sing: verasema
Second Sing: veraseta
Third Sing: veraseto
First Plu: verasemo
Second Plu: veraseze
Third Plu: veraseno

Future Subj.
First Sing: veraseio
Second Sing: veraseies
Third Sing: veraseiet
First Plu: veraseios
Second Plu: veraseiz
Third Plu: veraseioi

Imperative
Second Sing: vere
Second Plu: verete
quinaz "to buy"
Spoiler:
Present Ind.
First Sing: quino
Second Sing: quinas
Third Sing: quinat
First Plu: quinos
Second Plu: quiniz
Third Plu: quinai

Past Ind.
First Sing: quinama
Second Sing: quinata
Third Sing: quinato
First Plu: quinamo
Second Plu: quinaze
Third Plu: quinano

Fut Ind.
First Sing: quinaio
Second Sing: quinaies
Third Sing: quinaiet
First Plu: quinaios
Second Plu: quinaiz
Third Plu: quinaioi

Present Subj.
First Sing: quinaso
Second Sing: quinases
Third Sing: quinaset
First Plu: quinasos
Second Plu: quinasiz
Third Plu: quinasoi

Past Subj.
First Sing: quinasema
Second Sing: quinaseta
Third Sing: quinaseto
First Plu: quinasemo
Second Plu: quinaseze
Third Plu: quinaseno

Future Subj.
First Sing: quinaseio
Second Sing: quinaseies
Third Sing: quinaseiet
First Plu: quinaseios
Second Plu: quinaseiz
Third Plu: quinaseioi

Imperative
Second Sing: quina
Second Plu: quinate
Copula

The copula of Fortunatian (tiz) was derived from the Proto-Celtic verb *tāyeti "to stand, to be", akin to the Spanish verb estar.

tiz "to be"
Spoiler:
Present Ind.
First Sing: to
Second Sing: tes
Third Sing: tet
First Plu: tos
Second Plu: teiz
Third Plu: toi

Past Ind.
First Sing: tema
Second Sing: teta
Third Sing: teto
First Plu: temo
Second Plu: teze
Third Plu: teno

Fut Ind.
First Sing: teio
Second Sing: teies
Third Sing: teiet
First Plu: teios
Second Plu: teiz
Third Plu: teioi

Present Subj.3
First Sing: zo
Second Sing: zes
Third Sing: zet
First Plu: zos
Second Plu: ziz
Third Plu: zoi

Past Subj.
First Sing: zema
Second Sing: zeta
Third Sing: zeto
First Plu: zemo
Second Plu: zeze
Third Plu: zeno

Future Subj.
First Sing: zeio
Second Sing: zeies
Third Sing: zeiet
First Plu: zeios
Second Plu: zeiz
Third Plu: zeioi

Imperative
Second Sing: toi
Second Plu: toite
The copula can also be used as an auxiliary verb to form any number of concepts that cannot be expressed solely by the verb. When combined with the preposition ad "to" and a verbal infinitive, it can be used to express a progressive aspect. For example, one could say to ad quinaz "I am buying" instead of quino "I buy".

Notes:
1. The word tecan is derived from a hypothetical Gallaecian word **tek-agn-os "toy", a direct cognate of the Welsh term tegan.
2. The Future tense is derived from the sye-desiderative, making Fortunatian the only Celtic language to exhibit this innovation besides Gaulish.
3. The subjunctive verb forms of tiz "to be" originally started with the stem *t-as-, but this was later shortened to *ts- in fast speech, resulting in an initial consonant of z-.
Last edited by Esneirra973 on 24 May 2024 03:35, edited 4 times in total.
Esneirra973
sinic
sinic
Posts: 336
Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05

Re: Fortunatian Scratchpad

Post by Esneirra973 »

WeepingElf wrote: 18 May 2024 22:03
Esneirra973 wrote: 18 May 2024 17:42
WeepingElf wrote: 18 May 2024 17:21
Esneirra973 wrote: 18 May 2024 14:48 Fortunatian was a predominantly VSO language, a feature one could liken to other Q-Celtic languages (such as Old Irish).
Does it show other Insular Celtic traits, such as initial mutations, absolute vs.conjunct verb inflection or "conjugated prepositions" as well, or does it avoid these, being technically a Continental Celtic language?
Besides word order, it does not have any of these features. I figured these would be innovations reserved for Celtic languages spoken in the British Isles, given their geographical distance from the Iberian Peninsula and the fact that the speakers of Fortunatian would have mostly interacted with groups of people who did not have these features in their languages.
Actually, I am relieved reading this. My objection against Arvorec is that despite purporting to be a Continental Celtic language, it looks like an Insular one (though it is otherwise very finely crafted, by someone who ḱnows Celtic very well; and one may concede that it is at least located close enough to the British Isles to be affected by whatever caused the Insular Celtic languages to develop those features). I have ideas for two Continental Celtic conlangs myself neither of which has any of those features (alas, I am not currently working on them as I have enough other stuff to wrap my mind around).
I have similar objections to other languages like Brithenig for that reason. Even though the only surviving Celtic languages (all of which happen to be Insular) exhibit those features, it doesn't mean that they all must be applied to Continental Celtic languages as well. I would expect Arvorec to receive some influence from the languages spoken in the British Isles given their geographical proximity, but not to the extent that the creator of the language demonstrated.
User avatar
WeepingElf
greek
greek
Posts: 711
Joined: 23 Feb 2016 18:42
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Contact:

Re: Fortunatian Scratchpad

Post by WeepingElf »

Esneirra973 wrote: 18 May 2024 22:16
WeepingElf wrote: 18 May 2024 22:03 Actually, I am relieved reading this. My objection against Arvorec is that despite purporting to be a Continental Celtic language, it looks like an Insular one (though it is otherwise very finely crafted, by someone who ḱnows Celtic very well; and one may concede that it is at least located close enough to the British Isles to be affected by whatever caused the Insular Celtic languages to develop those features). I have ideas for two Continental Celtic conlangs myself neither of which has any of those features (alas, I am not currently working on them as I have enough other stuff to wrap my mind around).
I have similar objections to other languages like Brithenig for that reason. Even though the only surviving Celtic languages (all of which happen to be Insular) exhibit those features, it doesn't mean that they all must be applied to Continental Celtic languages as well. I would expect Arvorec to receive some influence from the languages spoken in the British Isles given their geographical proximity, but not to the extent that the creator of the language demonstrated.
This is pretty much what I think of this, too. Of course, nobody really knows the reason why the Insular Celtic languages evolved in that "weird" way; but whatever that was, it appears to have been limited to the British Isles. It has been conjectured that it was a substratum language spoken in the Isles before they became Celtic-speaking; that substratum has been conjectured to have been Semitic or related to that, but that makes more problems than sense (the only thing Insular Celtic has in common with Semitic is VSO word order and some common typological correlates thereof; but VSO order isn't all that rare, and who claims a Semitic substratum in VSO languages of Mesoamerica or the Philippines?!). That doesn't mean that this could not be a substratum effect, but we simply don't know what languages were spoken in the British Isles before Celtic, so it could have been anything.

My personal hypothesis is that Celtic came to the British Isles only in the early Iron Age, and before that a different branch of Indo-European, descending from the language of the Bell Beaker culture, was spoken there. This language may have been related to the Anatolian branch of IE. Alas, this is just speculation insufficiently backed up by evidence (at least, there is some evidence that seems to point at an IE language that had merged PIE *o with *a in much of Western Europe, which therefore cannot be the ancestor of Celtic, as Celtic, as well as Italic, keeps PIE *a and *o separate), but I explore this hypothesis in my Hesperic/Albic project. This, however, only postpones the matter, as it raises the question why the dialect of the Bell Beaker language spoken in the British Isles showed the relevant traits while the dialects in Continental Western Europe did not (or at least, did not affect Continental Celtic, Italic nor Germanic in the same way they affected Insular Celtic).
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf
My conlang pages
Yrgidrámamintih!
User avatar
WeepingElf
greek
greek
Posts: 711
Joined: 23 Feb 2016 18:42
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Contact:

Re: Fortunatian Scratchpad

Post by WeepingElf »

I have just created a new thread to discuss questions of Celtic historical linguistics like the ones that have come up here.
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf
My conlang pages
Yrgidrámamintih!
Esneirra973
sinic
sinic
Posts: 336
Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05

Re: Fortunatian Scratchpad

Post by Esneirra973 »

WeepingElf wrote: 19 May 2024 01:37
Esneirra973 wrote: 18 May 2024 22:16 I have similar objections to other languages like Brithenig for that reason. Even though the only surviving Celtic languages (all of which happen to be Insular) exhibit those features, it doesn't mean that they all must be applied to Continental Celtic languages as well. I would expect Arvorec to receive some influence from the languages spoken in the British Isles given their geographical proximity, but not to the extent that the creator of the language demonstrated.
This is pretty much what I think of this, too. Of course, nobody really knows the reason why the Insular Celtic languages evolved in that "weird" way; but whatever that was, it appears to have been limited to the British Isles. It has been conjectured that it was a substratum language spoken in the Isles before they became Celtic-speaking; that substratum has been conjectured to have been Semitic or related to that, but that makes more problems than sense (the only thing Insular Celtic has in common with Semitic is VSO word order and some common typological correlates thereof; but VSO order isn't all that rare, and who claims a Semitic substratum in VSO languages of Mesoamerica or the Philippines?!). That doesn't mean that this could not be a substratum effect, but we simply don't know what languages were spoken in the British Isles before Celtic, so it could have been anything.

My personal hypothesis is that Celtic came to the British Isles only in the early Iron Age, and before that a different branch of Indo-European, descending from the language of the Bell Beaker culture, was spoken there. This language may have been related to the Anatolian branch of IE. Alas, this is just speculation insufficiently backed up by evidence (at least, there is some evidence that seems to point at an IE language that had merged PIE *o with *a in much of Western Europe, which therefore cannot be the ancestor of Celtic, as Celtic, as well as Italic, keeps PIE *a and *o separate), but I explore this hypothesis in my Hesperic/Albic project. This, however, only postpones the matter, as it raises the question why the dialect of the Bell Beaker language spoken in the British Isles showed the relevant traits while the dialects in Continental Western Europe did not (or at least, did not affect Continental Celtic, Italic nor Germanic in the same way they affected Insular Celtic).
It’s possible that the distinction between the evolution of Continental Celtic languages as opposed to Insular Celtic languages lies in the existence of a pre-Indo-European substrate predating the Indo-European dialects spoken by the Bell Beakers. I have read up on similar theories to your Hesperic languages (some with more merit than others), and I think both are certainly possible. Ultimately, we have no record of the languages spoken in the Western Europe before the Celtic languages (save for a few survivors such as Basque/Aquitanian, Iberian, and perhaps Tartessian). Any number of languages or language families, whether Indo-European or not, could have been spoken there.

There might also be evidence of Indo-Europeans arriving in Britain before the Iron Age. A study conducted in 2021 within Britain revealed a genetic inflow from continental Europe during the Bronze Age based on several archaeological samples. One such example (Diamond Cottage 21306) was a man estimated to have lived between 2200 BC and 1400 BC, and had a paternal haplogroup whose presence in Europe is associated with Indo-European peoples. This could indicate an earlier migration of Celtic peoples into Britain than previously anticipated, or it could represent an older Indo-European group that predated the Celts. The authors of the study seem to posit an earlier Celtic migration, but who knows? I find the implications of this study to be quite interesting.
Esneirra973
sinic
sinic
Posts: 336
Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05

Re: Fortunatian Scratchpad

Post by Esneirra973 »

Now that I've come up with a basic framework for Fortunatian, I've been toying with one possible idea for a descendant language spoken in the Azores, or Nitipua1. Since they were at quite a distance from the major powers of Europe (as well as the other Fortunatian islands), the Nitipuans did not have many external influences on their language. Linguists speculate that this might be why their language has such a small phonology in comparison to other Fortunatian languages. With only 9 consonants and 3 vowels, it has one of the smallest phonemic inventories out of any Indo-European language.

Due to Viking raids in Nitipua during the 10th century, the inhabitants of the region lost contact with European merchants and their contemporaries of the other Fortunatian Isles. Society in the region had collapsed, and the islands entered a dark age in which centuries of history went unrecorded, save for a few scant documents and inscriptions written in what is assumed to be a precursor to the Nitipuan language. In 1424, an expedition led by Prince Henry the Navigator made landfall on the island of Loicos (Nitipuan: Mi'u2). In the next couple of decades, the Portuguese saw it fit to take advantage of the natural resources in Nitipua, swiftly conquering the islands.

Over time, more migrants from Portugal arrived in Nitipua, and it became a central stopping point for many Portuguese ships going on expeditions to the New World. This brought prosperity to the islands, which many of the remaining natives took advantage of. Duarte Naquetoto (Nitipuan: Tauri Naquituatu3), the son of the last druid-king of Loicos, was granted a high position in Nitipoa. He was made governor of Nitipoa in 1502, a decision made in recognition of his social status and his contributions to the burgeoning of Nitipua’s economic prosperity.

Today, Nitipuan and Portuguese are co-official languages in Nitipua, and the inhabitants of the island are proud of their roots. There are also speakers of Nitipuan present in the Americas, having their own unique dialect that I might expand upon at some point.

Phonemic Inventory:

/m n/ <m n>
/p t k ʔ/ <p t c~qu '>
/s h/ <s h>
/r/ <r>
/i u a/ <i u a>

Allophony
  • The vowels /i u a/ become /ɪ ʊ ɐ/ when unstressed.
  • The consonants /t s h/ become [t͡ʃ ʃ ʃ] before /i/.
  • Sequences of /iN uN aN/ become [ɛ̃ ɔ̃ ɐ̃] unless followed by a vowel.
  • Sequences of /Vi Vu/ are realized as [Vj Vw].
  • The consonants /m n/ are pronounced /b d/ word-initially.
  • Sequences of /hu/ are realized as [ɸu].
  • The plosives /p t k/ are pronounced /b d g/ intervocalically.
Diachronic History:

Fortunatian to Nitipuan
Spoiler:
Weakening of Strengthening of Fricatives
/s/ > /j/ | before or after front vowels
/θ/ > /t/ > /k/ > /ʔ/
/ɸ/ > /h/
/x/ > /h.

Simplification of Diphthongs
/VjV/ > /Vj/ | if the second vowel is a front vowel
/ij uj ej oj aj/ > /i oj ej oj aj/
/iw uw ew ow aw/ > /ew u ew ow aw/

Outcome of /ŋ/
/ŋ/ > /n/ | _i
/ŋ/ > /w/

Simplification of Vowel System
/o/ > /ua/ | initially and in stressed open syllables
/o/ > /u/ | unstressed
/e/ > /i/ | unstressed
/e/ > /ia/ | initially and in stressed open syllables
/Vj Vw/ > /Vi Vu/
/uj iw/ > /wi ju/ | _[C#]

Loss of /j/ and /w/
/Cj/ > /Cij/
/mw nw/ > /m/
/sw hw rw/ > /w/
/w/ > /m/
/j/ > /t/
Example Sentence:

Minica in capitau itu u in uritu.
/minika in kapitau itu u in uritu/
[mɪnigɐ ɛ̃ gɐbidɐw idʊ u ɛ̃ ʊɾidʊ]
see-PST.IND.SG DEF captain fish at DEF horizon
The captain saw a fish on the horizon.

Notes:
1. The term Nitipua is derived from the Fortunatian term Nizepoa, a name allotted to the Azores specifically. It is, in turn, derived from the Proto-Celtic *Enistyās Ekʷonās "Islands of Epona". The first settlers of the island were mostly led by Druids, and the name stuck due to the continued popularity of the Celtic pantheon in the region.
2. The term Mi'u is a direct descendant of the older term Loicos/Noicos, mentioned at the beginning of this thread!
3. The name Tauri is derived from the Proto-Celtic name *Tankorīxs, and his surname Naquituatu is derived from Natioio, from the Gallaecian name Latronios.
Esneirra973
sinic
sinic
Posts: 336
Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05

Re: Fortunatian Scratchpad

Post by Esneirra973 »

The primary word order in Nitipuan is VOS, unlike other Celtic languages spoken today, although VSO can be seen in highly formal contexts and archaic language. Due to the collapse of its phonemic inventory over the centuries, many noun, adjective, and verb endings were blurred together. This is best seen in the evolution of its present tense verb conjugations, which will be demonstrated with the verb venez "to see", which later evolved into minit "to see".

veno me > *minu mi > minic mi
venes to > *minii cu > minic cu
venet se > *minic si > minic si
venos nes > *minus nii > mini nii
veniz fes > *minit hii > mini hii
venoi ies > *minii ii > mini sus

Verbs in Nitipuan only distinguish between two numbers (singular and plural), two tenses (past and nonpast), and two moods (indicative and subjunctive). Nouns do not decline for case or number. As such, extensive use is made of both prepositional and postpositional particles to express concepts that would have previously been attached to verbal and noun stems in Fortunatian. See, for example, the following sentence translated into both Fortunatian and Nitipuan.

Razo eta ivenasesot nono va Noicos con oru tuve.
ask-PRES.IND.1SG REL return-PRES.SUBJ.2SG-2SG.SUBJ.EMPH safe from Loicos with gold 2SG.GEN
I ask that you return from Loicos safely with your gold.

Ratic mi ica ma Mi'u iminas cu 'un uru ma cu.
ask-NPST.IND.SG 1SG REL from Loicos return-NPST.SUBJ.SG 2SG with gold of 2SG
I ask that you return from Loicos safely with your gold.

Below, I have listed the verbal paradigms present in Nitipuan, demonstrated with the regular verbs miric "to bear" and 'inac "to buy". I have also included the copula verb quic "to be", for those interested in its evolution.

miric “to bear”
Spoiler:
Indicative
Nonpast Singular/Plural: miric/miri
Past Singular/Plural: mirica/miriu

Subjunctive
Nonpast Singular/Plural: miras/mirai
Past Singular/Plural: miraica/mirau
'inac “to buy”
Spoiler:
Indicative
Nonpast Singular/Plural: 'inac/'inai
Past Singular/Plural: 'inaca/'inau

Subjunctive
Nonpast Singular/Plural: 'inasac/'inasi
Past Singular/Plural: 'inasaca/'inasau
quic “to be”
Spoiler:
Indicative
Nonpast Singular/Plural: quic/qui
Past Singular/Plural: quica/quinu

Subjunctive
Nonpast Singular/Plural: tic/ti
Past Singular/Plural: tica/tinu
As mentioned before, these verbs are used in conjunction with several particles and auxiliary constructions. For example, the future tense is now expressed with a grammatical construction that would not look out of place in Western Europe. If one were to say "I will buy this apple", they would phrase it as Quihic1 'inac aman mi, which literally means "I go to buy this apple." Here is how the same verb timitic2 "to stop" can be expressed with different tenses and aspects.

Present - Timitic si. "He stops."
Past - Timitica si "He stopped."
Future - Quihic timitic si "He will stop."
Present Perfect - Quic timitic si "He has stopped."
Past Perfect - Quica timitic si "He had stopped."
Future Perfect - Quihic quic timitic si "He will have stopped."
Present Conditional - 'Urac3 timitic si "He would stop."
Past Conditional - 'Uraca timitic si "He would have stopped."
Future Conditional - Quihic 'urac timitic si "He will have stopped (with a conditional meaning)."

Note:
1. The verb quihic comes from the Proto-Celtic verb *tēgeti "to go".
2. The verb timitic comes from the Proto-Celtic verb *dīwedeti "to stop."
3. The verb 'urac comes from the Fortunatian verb curaz "to want", which was derived from the Proto-Celtic noun *kubros "desired"
Esneirra973
sinic
sinic
Posts: 336
Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05

Re: Fortunatian Scratchpad

Post by Esneirra973 »

Nitipuan is also spoken in Portuguese colonies across the world, but mainly on the Brazilian coast. The dialect spoken here has undergone greater phonological shifts, and at times is hard to understand for inhabitants of Nitipua in the Old World. Here are some of the changes that the dialect has undergone since its arrival in South America in the 17th century.
  • /iN uN aN/ > [ĩ ũ ɐ̃]
  • /iNu uNu aNu/ > [ĩw ũw ɐ̃w]
  • /iNi uNi aNi/ > [ĩj ũj ɐ̃j]
  • /r/ > [h]
  • /ʔ/ > [h]
  • /s/ > [h] (in syllabic coda)
  • The consonants /t s h/ become [t͡ʃ ʃ ʃ] before /i/. (including allophonic /n r ʔ/)
  • /mV nV/ > [pṼ tṼ]
This results in the following phonemic inventory, which is spelled according to Portuguese orthographic rules in Brazil. With only 5 to 7 consonants, it has less consonants than any other Indo-European language.

Phonology

/p t~t͡ʃ k/ <p t~ch c~qu '>
/s~ʃ h~ʃ/ <s~x r~h>
/i u a/ <i u a>
/ĩ ũ ɐ̃/ <im um ã> (/ĩ ũ/ are spelled as <in un> if they precede any consonant besides <p>)
/ĩj ĩw ũj ũw ɐ̃j ɐ̃w/ <ẽ ẽo õe õ ãe ão> (/ĩj ũw/ are spelled as <em om> preceding <p>, and as <en on> before any other consonant>)

Many speakers also conflate the plosives /p t k/ with their nasal counterparts [m n ŋ], especially in the proximity of nasal vowels. For example, the verb pintinc "to see" might be pronounced as [pĩtĩk], [mĩtĩk], [pĩnĩk], or even [mĩnĩŋ]. Here is a previously used example sentence in Nitipuan, with the allophonic pronunciations of both dialects.

Ratic mi ica ma Mi'u iminas cu 'un uru ma cu.
[ɾat͡ʃɪk mɪ igɐ mɐ miʔʊ ɪminɐs ku ʔʊn uɾʊ mɐ gu]
Rachic pim ica pam Pimhu entãh cu hum uru pam cu.
[hat͡ʃik pĩ ika pɐ̃ pĩhu ĩjtɐ̃h ku hũ uhu pɐ̃ ku]
ask-NPST.IND.SG 1SG REL from Loicos return-NPST.SUBJ.SG 2SG with gold of 2SG
I ask that you return from Loicos safely with your gold.

Given that there are languages in South America (such as Pirahã) with exceedingly small phonologies, I figured this would be a good location to place a similarly constricted dialect of Nitipuan (or Chinchipuahu as it is called in this dialect). I can't imagine creating a descendant language of Fortunatian with an even smaller phonology than this. Although, anyone here is free to make their own derivations if they have any ideas! As such, Nitipuan and its dialects are likely among the Celtic languages with the smallest phonologies in this setting.
Visions1
roman
roman
Posts: 1200
Joined: 27 Jul 2021 08:05

Re: Fortunatian Scratchpad

Post by Visions1 »

You could use some hiatus, consonant deletion, and sandhi nonsense to merge vowels together.
Very clever project you've got.
Back!
Esneirra973
sinic
sinic
Posts: 336
Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05

Re: Fortunatian Scratchpad

Post by Esneirra973 »

Visions1 wrote: 18 Jun 2024 01:57 You could use some hiatus, consonant deletion, and sandhi nonsense to merge vowels together.
Very clever project you've got.
Thank you! I'm glad other people on the CBB have taken an interest in this project. I plan to develop more daughter langs for Fortunatian once I have the time.
Esneirra973
sinic
sinic
Posts: 336
Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05

Re: Fortunatian Scratchpad

Post by Esneirra973 »

Zinigric (Zinigric: Tomot Zinigri1) is another Fortunatian language that is most notable for being the only of its kind still spoken in mainland Europe and Africa. It has around 50,000 speakers, who mainly live in Senegal, Mauretania, Mali, Morocco, and Niger. Of the Fortunatian languages, it is the most divergent in terms of phonemic inventory and grammatical innovation. They descend from Fortunatian speakers in the Canary Islands who migrated further inland and established settlements in Andar2 and Oboghos3, then expanding from there. The vast expanses of the Sahara Desert caused them to lose contact with other Fortunatian speakers, and the Zinigrians eventually forgot about their insular origins. Today, they have been thoroughly Islamicized and assimilated into surrounding cultural groups, which is part of why their language now faces risk of extinction. Records of their journey through Northwestern Africa only survive in old chronicles written in the Arabic and Zinigric languages, which were rediscovered in the late 19th century.

In 1896, French colonization efforts resulted in an influx of archaeological and historical studies within their African colonies. As such, greater attention was devoted to the Zinigrians, who spoke a seemingly familiar language despite their great distance from the speakers of other Indo-European languages. Of particular note were the aforementioned historical records, which told of a people called al-Jazariyyūn al-Ḥumr (the Red Islanders). They had allegedly risen from the sea and begun settling further and further inland, establishing trading posts and making new allies along the way. In 520 AH (1126 CE), the leader of the Ghana Empire granted the Zinigrians free passage into his domain, on the condition that they accepted Sunni Islam as their religion. Many Zinigrians obliged, and this is said by many to be the reason why they are predominantly Muslim today.

Further research revealed that the Zinigrians spoke a Celtic language, related to the Fortunatian dialects of the Atlantic Ocean and the Insular Celtic languages (Welsh, Breton, Manx, Irish, etc.) In the following decades, leaders of Zinigrian communities in Northwestern Africa made efforts to establish relations with other Celtic communities. Today, the Zinigrians (who number 530,000 in total) are recognized as a Celtic people, and efforts are being made to revitalize the language in their communities. It is an official language in Mauritania and Senegal, and the language is offered in curriculums across both countries, with it being made mandatory in towns where a majority of the population is Zinigrian.

Phonemic Inventory:

/m n ɲ ŋ/ <m n ny nh>
/ᵐb ⁿd ᶮɟ ᵑg/ <mb nd ndh ng>
/p b t d c ɟ k g q/ <p b t d th dh k g q>
/f s z ɕ ʑ x ɣ/ <f v s z sh zh kh gh>
/r l j w/ <r l y w>
/i u e o a/ <i u e o a>

Diachronic History:
Spoiler:
Fortunatian to Proto-Canarid
/V/ > /Vː/ | stressed open syllables
/NVp NVt NVk/ > /bb dd gg/ | word internally and unstressed
/p t k/ > /b d g/ | word internally
/NVɸ NVθ NVs NVx/ > /ββ ðð zz ɣɣ/ | word internally and unstressed
/ɸ θ s x/ > /β ð z ɣ/ | word internally
/n/ > /l/ | when /n/ follows in a word
/r/ > /l/ | when /r/ follows in a word
/Ci(ː) Cu(ː)/ > /Cʲe(ː) Cʷo(ː)/
/jʲ wʲ/ > /j/
/jʷ wʷ/ > /w/
/eː oː/ > /ia ua/ | stressed open syllables (does not apply to former /iː uː/)
/e(ː) o(ː)/ > /i(ː) u(ː)/
/ii ui ai/ > /iː iː ai/
/iu uu au/ > /uː uː au/
/aa/ > /aː/
/Cia Cua/ > /Cʲa Cʷa/
/ia ua/ > /ja wa/
/V/ > /∅/ | unstressed

Proto-Canarid Phonemic Inventory
/m n ŋ/ <m n ng>
/mʲ nʲ ŋʲ/ <my ny ngy>
/mʷ nʷ ŋʷ/ <mw nw ngw>
/p b t d k g/ <p b t d k g>
/pʲ bʲ tʲ dʲ kʲ gʲ/ <py by ty dy ky gy>
/pʷ bʷ tʷ dʷ kʷ gʷ/ <pw bw tw dw kw gw>
/ɸ β θ ð s z x ɣ/ <f v th dh s z kh gh>
/ɸʲ βʲ θʲ ðʲ sʲ zʲ xʲ ɣʲ/ <fy vy thy dhy sy zy khy ghy>
/ɸʷ βʷ θʷ ðʷ sʷ zʷ xʷ ɣʷ/ <fw vw thw dhw sw zw khw ghw>
/r l j w/ <r l y w>
/rʲ lʲ/ <ry ly>
/rʷ lʷ/ <rw lw>
/i u a/ <i u a>
/iː uː aː/ <ii uu aa>

Proto-Canarid to Zinigric
Collapse of Palatalized and Labialized Sounds
/ŋʲ ŋʷ/ > /j w/
/Nʲ Nʷ/ > /ɲ ŋ/
/ɸ β/ > /x ɣ/ | including palatalized and labialized variants
/θ ð/ > /f~s d~z/ | including palatalized and labialized variants (different words in Zinigric have outcomes of /f d/ and /s z/ due to borrowings between dialects)
/pʷ tʷ kʷ/ > /pp/ | word internally
/bʷ dʷ gʷ/ > /bb/ | word internally
/pʷ tʷ kʷ/ > /p/
/bʷ dʷ gʷ/ > /b/
/tʲ dʲ sʲ zʲ/ > /c ɟ ɕ ʑ/
/kʲ gʲ/ > /c ɟ/
/xʲ ɣʲ/ > /ç ʝ/ > /ɕ ʑ/ | both fricatives could also become /j/ internally, in multisyllabic words or unstressed syllables. The same applies to /ɕ ʑ/ from earlier /sʲ zʲ/
/xʷ ɣʷ/ > /f w/ | both fricatives could also become /w/ internally, in multisyllabic words or unstressed syllables
/rʲ lʲ/ > /jj/ | word internally
/rʷ lʷ/ > /ww/ | word internally
Any remaining instances of /Cʲ/ and /Cʷ/ become /Cj Cw/ respectively.
/jji wwu/ > /ɟɟi bbu/
/ji wu/ > /ɟi bu/

Development of Prenasalized Plosives
/Np Nb Nt Nd Nc Nɟ Nk Ng/ > /ᵐp ᵐb ⁿt ⁿd ᶮc ᶮɟ ᵑk ᵑg/ > /ᵐb ᵐb ⁿd ⁿd ᶮɟ ᶮɟ ᵑg ᵑg/
/m n ɲ ŋ/ > /ᵐb ⁿd ᶮɟ ᵑg/ | word-initially and stressed (sporadic)

Collapse of Vowel Length
/k g/ > /q ɢ/ > /q ɣ/ | before /a(ː)/
/i u a/ > /ɪ ʊ ɐ/ > /e o ə/
/iː uː aː/ > /i u a/
/ə/ > /V/ | if /V/ follows. (ex. *aɟir > *əɟer > *eɟer, from Fortunatian atir "father")
/ə/ > /a/
Thina tham rinyin obbo bo shindir wa me.
/cina cam riɲin obːo bo ɕiⁿdir wa me/
buy 1S.PST bracelet gold for grandfather of 1S
I bought a golden bracelet for my grandfather.

Note:

1. From the name of the Sanhaja tribe and the Fortunatian word roi "country", from Proto-Celtic *mrogis
2. OTL Saint-Louis, Senegal
3. OTL Aoudaghost, Mauretania. From Proto-Canarid *Adwaghus.
Esneirra973
sinic
sinic
Posts: 336
Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05

Re: Fortunatian Scratchpad

Post by Esneirra973 »

The grammar of Zinigric is quite analytic in comparison to other Celtic languages. Many noun and verb endings have been eroded, but many grammatical innovations have developed over the past few centuries.

Pronouns and Verbs

Like other languages in West Africa, Zinigric has developed pronouns that distinguish a temporal aspect. The imperfective pronouns are derived from the past indicative forms of the Fortunatian copula tiz "to be". The future pronouns are derived from the present subjunctive forms of the same verb. This verb has fallen out of use due to the influence of Arabic, although a new copula has developed that will be discussed later. There is extensive debate as to whether the first two sets of pronouns represent a perfective and imperfective distinction or a past and present distinction. They are used in both cases, and the distinctions of tenses are often blurred in Zinigric for this reason.

First Sing. Perfective/Imperfective/Future: tham/me/fo
Second Sing. Perfective/Imperfective/Future: thad/to/fes
Third Sing. Perfective/Imperfective/Future: thod/se/fet
First Plu. Perfective/Imperfective/Future: thom/nos/fos
Second Plu. Perfective/Imperfective/Future: thev/fos/fef
Third Plu. Perfective/Imperfective/Future: thon/sos/fi

Other suffixes can also be appended to pronouns to denote different aspects.

Conditional/Subjunctive: -sa (from Fortunatian -s- "subjunctive infix")
Inchoative: -tiz (from Fortunatian toisaz "to start", from Proto-Celtic *towissus)
Cessative: -dhai (from Fortunatian ievedez "to stop", from Proto-Celtic *dīwedeti)

Sometimes, perfective and imperfective pronouns can be used together to denote different tenses. Usually, the usage of one pronoun is sufficient, but multiple can be used for matters of emphasis. The following pronouns could result in the following tense and aspect combinations:
Spoiler:
Perfective > general perfective

Imperfective > general imperfective

Perfective + Perfective > past perfective

Imperfective + Imperfective > present imperfective

Perfective + Imperfective > past imperfective

Imperfective + Perfective > present imperfective

Future > general future

Future + Future > far future

Future + Perfective > future perfective

Future + Imperfective > future imperfective

Perfective + Future > far future perfective

Imperfective + Future > far future imperfective
Here are some example sentences that demonstrate how the differences between tenses and aspects can appear. In cases where multiple pronouns are used, any affixes are appended to the first pronoun.

Yadhe se dhiru shono shen. "He stops the old man."

Yadhe thod dhiru shono shen. "He stopped the old man."

Yadhe thod se dhiru shono shen. "He always stopped the old man."

Yadhe se thod dhiru shono shen. "He stops the old man. (emph.)"

As shown here, word order in Zinigric is predominantly VSO, due to its Celtic background and influence from Arabic as a language of prestige.

Nouns and Adjectives

Nouns and adjectives do not decline for case or number, and the number of nouns is often made obvious through the context of the full phrase. They can be marked for definiteness, by the article shen which succeeds the noun. In Zinigric, adjectives succeed nouns, and possessors succeed possessed nouns.

The Copula

Zinigric has one copula shafa, derived from the Fortunatian verb sizaz (from Proto-Celtic *sistati "to put, stand"). It is seldom used, but it can still be found in some phrases. It is more commonly used in the speech of older individuals.

Example Sentences

Rav tham ta wa Noykos yane to nhano kon woro wa to.
/rav cam ta wa nojkos jane to ŋano kon woro wa to/
ask 1SG.PF REL from Loicos return 2SG.IMPF safe with gold of 2SG.IMPF
I ask that you return from Loicos safely with your gold.

Shafa po the u dhiru shen.
/ɕafa po ce u ɟiru ɕen/
be dog three at man DEF
The man owns three dogs. (Three dogs are at the man.)

Am thod nhama wa se.
/am cod ŋama wa se/
wash 3SG.PF hand of 3SG.IMPF
He washed his hands. (He washed his own hands.)

Am thod nhama u wes se.
/am cod ŋama u wes se/
wash 3SG.PF hand at away 3SG.IMPF
He washed his hands. (He washed the hands of another person.)
Post Reply