(L&N) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Re: (L&N) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
What is the semantic role of emotions?
In the clause "I feel pain." what is the role of 'pain'? It is a noun so it should have a role.
In the clause "I feel pain." what is the role of 'pain'? It is a noun so it should have a role.
My meta-thread: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5760
-
- mongolian
- Posts: 4598
- Joined: 14 Aug 2010 09:36
- Location: California über alles
Re: (L&N) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
I'd say "pain" is the agent, and the first-person singular pronoun is the patient. With verbs like "feel", "see", "hear", etc., the patient happens to become the subject -- and the agent the direct object -- in many languages, such as English.
♂♥♂♀
Squirrels chase koi . . . chase squirrels
My Kankonian-English dictionary: Now at 109,000 words!
31,416: The number of the conlanging beast!
Squirrels chase koi . . . chase squirrels
My Kankonian-English dictionary: Now at 109,000 words!
31,416: The number of the conlanging beast!
- Creyeditor
- MVP
- Posts: 5359
- Joined: 14 Aug 2012 19:32
- Contact:
Re: (L&N) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
The subject in "I feel pain" is an Experiencer. In other similar sentences the emotion is often part of the predicate, as in "I love pasta.". I would say that "feel pain" might be a complex predicate as it's equivalent to (some sense) of "to hurt".
Creyeditor
https://sites.google.com/site/creyeditor/
Produce, Analyze, Manipulate
1
2
3
4
4
Omlűt &
Kobardon & Fredauon Fun Facts & AMA on Indonesian
Papuan languages, Morphophonology, Lexical Semantics ![<3 [<3]](./images/smilies/heartic.png)
https://sites.google.com/site/creyeditor/
Produce, Analyze, Manipulate
1







![<3 [<3]](./images/smilies/heartic.png)
![<3 [<3]](./images/smilies/heartic.png)
Re: (L&N) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Thank you for your answers!
Damn, I think you are right. I have a vague idea of a lang without verbs where all nouns are case-marked according to their roles. But yes, I also think it doesn't have a role in the basic list.Creyeditor wrote: ↑29 Dec 2024 19:42 The subject in "I feel pain" is an Experiencer. In other similar sentences the emotion is often part of the predicate, as in "I love pasta.". I would say that "feel pain" might be a complex predicate as it's equivalent to (some sense) of "to hurt".
I think you mean actor - the more agent-like argument - and undergoer - the more patient-like argument. Semantic roles can be abstracted to such a dichotomy, but I meant the basic list that has a few more roles.Khemehekis wrote: ↑29 Dec 2024 19:14I'd say "pain" is the agent, and the first-person singular pronoun is the patient. With verbs like "feel", "see", "hear", etc., the patient happens to become the subject -- and the agent the direct object -- in many languages, such as English.
My meta-thread: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5760
-
- hieroglyphic
- Posts: 30
- Joined: 03 Jan 2025 11:13
Re: (L&N) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
What is the "most analytic" (for some definition of "most analytic) natural language? In a similar vein, what is the most analytic conlang that you know of?
Semi-expert in creating horrid vowel inventories, hyperminimalistic and hypermaximalistic phonologies, and mathematical conlangs.
|
|
Riemannic, Wug Nlab

![:D [:D]](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin2.png)

![:x [:x]](./images/smilies/icon_shamesz.png)

-
- greek
- Posts: 573
- Joined: 29 Aug 2024 17:27
Re: (L&N) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Toki Pona is a prefectly analytic conlangH. H. P. M. P. Cole wrote: ↑03 Jan 2025 12:35 What is the "most analytic" (for some definition of "most analytic) natural language? In a similar vein, what is the most analytic conlang that you know of?
- Creyeditor
- MVP
- Posts: 5359
- Joined: 14 Aug 2012 19:32
- Contact:
Re: (L&N) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
If analytic means analytic and isolating here, I have to say that I do not know of a single language that has neither compounding, nor affixation, nor some kind of tonal/mutation morphology.
Creyeditor
https://sites.google.com/site/creyeditor/
Produce, Analyze, Manipulate
1
2
3
4
4
Omlűt &
Kobardon & Fredauon Fun Facts & AMA on Indonesian
Papuan languages, Morphophonology, Lexical Semantics ![<3 [<3]](./images/smilies/heartic.png)
https://sites.google.com/site/creyeditor/
Produce, Analyze, Manipulate
1







![<3 [<3]](./images/smilies/heartic.png)
![<3 [<3]](./images/smilies/heartic.png)
- eldin raigmore
- korean
- Posts: 6411
- Joined: 14 Aug 2010 19:38
- Location: SouthEast Michigan
Re: (L&N) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
I don’t think mutation of consonants or vowels, nor mutation of the tones, violates analytic-and-isolating.Creyeditor wrote: ↑03 Jan 2025 15:28 If analytic means analytic and isolating here, I have to say that I do not know of a single language that has neither compounding, nor affixation, nor some kind of tonal/mutation morphology.
I’m not sure about compounding!
Does a language which allows compounding, automatically not qualify as analytic and/or isolating?
Maybe so!
My minicity is http://gonabebig1day.myminicity.com/xml
Re: (L&N) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
I think this has been discussed before as to derivation and morphology should be treated separately on this front, e.g. does "relies on compounds for derivation" count or isolating or not? And it seems reasonable to consider things like mutation as an example of non-isolating behaviour (while it might not be an example of affixation, there's definitely something going on that's roughly equivalent to a morphological process to indicate a change in meaning)
Personally, since some compounds can also include morphological elements, it does seem reasonable to consider derivation and grammatical morphology separately, but along a similar axis. As Creyeditor has noted, though, it doesn't seem like any one language is purely isolating, but off the top of my head I can't think of a language that is the "most" isolating language
(again, though, I realise the question was "most analytic", but given that "analytic" means "low morpheme to word count", I've assumed that "analytic" was intended to mean "isolating")
Personally, since some compounds can also include morphological elements, it does seem reasonable to consider derivation and grammatical morphology separately, but along a similar axis. As Creyeditor has noted, though, it doesn't seem like any one language is purely isolating, but off the top of my head I can't think of a language that is the "most" isolating language
(again, though, I realise the question was "most analytic", but given that "analytic" means "low morpheme to word count", I've assumed that "analytic" was intended to mean "isolating")
You can tell the same lie a thousand times,
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
-
- greek
- Posts: 573
- Joined: 29 Aug 2024 17:27
Re: (L&N) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
I guess to answer the mutation question you would have to see if isolating languages are less likely to have mutation. I wonder if WALS or something has anything on that.sangi39 wrote: ↑05 Jan 2025 03:30 I think this has been discussed before as to derivation and morphology should be treated separately on this front, e.g. does "relies on compounds for derivation" count or isolating or not? And it seems reasonable to consider things like mutation as an example of non-isolating behaviour (while it might not be an example of affixation, there's definitely something going on that's roughly equivalent to a morphological process to indicate a change in meaning)
Re: (L&N) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Are Japanese plosives sometimes pronounced as fricatives?
I think I have sometimes heard such pronunciation.
In which context does that happen? Is it to do with tones?
I think I have sometimes heard such pronunciation.
In which context does that happen? Is it to do with tones?
My meta-thread: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5760
Re: (L&N) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Wikipedia's article on Japanese phonology has this section on the lenition of voiced stops.
The user formerly known as "shimobaatar".
(she)
(she)
Re: (L&N) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Eye seazyma wrote: ↑18 Jan 2025 20:08 Wikipedia's article on Japanese phonology has this section on the lenition of voiced stops.
It's possible that I've asked that before
Thank you
My meta-thread: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5760
Re: (L&N) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Languages with three vowel phonemes are normal.
But is there a language with only six (or eight) vowel phonemes half of which are nasal?
Nasals are probably unstable in small inventories where they can easily change to oral vowels with distinct qualities.
But is there a language with only six (or eight) vowel phonemes half of which are nasal?
Nasals are probably unstable in small inventories where they can easily change to oral vowels with distinct qualities.
My meta-thread: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5760
- Creyeditor
- MVP
- Posts: 5359
- Joined: 14 Aug 2012 19:32
- Contact:
Re: (L&N) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
I found Wapishana (https://phoible.org/inventories/view/608#tipa) and Jivaro (https://phoible.org/inventories/view/383#tipa) with eight vowels each, half of it nasal via UPSID on Phoible. Probably, there is more in South America.
Creyeditor
https://sites.google.com/site/creyeditor/
Produce, Analyze, Manipulate
1
2
3
4
4
Omlűt &
Kobardon & Fredauon Fun Facts & AMA on Indonesian
Papuan languages, Morphophonology, Lexical Semantics ![<3 [<3]](./images/smilies/heartic.png)
https://sites.google.com/site/creyeditor/
Produce, Analyze, Manipulate
1







![<3 [<3]](./images/smilies/heartic.png)
![<3 [<3]](./images/smilies/heartic.png)
Re: (L&N) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Thank you again. I should remember phoible myself.Creyeditor wrote: ↑21 Jan 2025 00:43 I found Wapishana (https://phoible.org/inventories/view/608#tipa) and Jivaro (https://phoible.org/inventories/view/383#tipa) with eight vowels each, half of it nasal via UPSID on Phoible. Probably, there is more in South America.
Then I think my Mandarin-ish vowel inventory is not fully unnatural.
i ĩ u ũ
ə ə̃(?)
a ã
My meta-thread: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5760
- WeepingElf
- greek
- Posts: 686
- Joined: 23 Feb 2016 18:42
- Location: Braunschweig, Germany
- Contact:
Re: (L&N) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Seems OK to me.Omzinesý wrote: ↑22 Jan 2025 22:07Thank you again. I should remember phoible myself.Creyeditor wrote: ↑21 Jan 2025 00:43 I found Wapishana (https://phoible.org/inventories/view/608#tipa) and Jivaro (https://phoible.org/inventories/view/383#tipa) with eight vowels each, half of it nasal via UPSID on Phoible. Probably, there is more in South America.
Then I think my Mandarin-ish vowel inventory is not fully unnatural.
i ĩ u ũ
ə ə̃(?)
a ã
Re: (L&N) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
I've watched a handful of videos recently dealing with the history of the English language, and the impact of the Norman conquest of 1066, and it got me thinking again about a question I've had (one and off) since college (so basically 18 years ago, and now I feel old)... To what extent did the import of Norman French actually impact the morphological development (or "simplification") of Old English as it became Middle English
For example, if you assume that all vowels in inflectional endings in Old English nouns reduce to a schwa, and, where two schwas appear in adjacent syllables, the second schwa drops out, you more or less end up with three patterns in the singular:
(1)
Nom: -
Acc: -
Gen: -əs
Dative:-ə
(2)
Nom: -ə
Acc: -ən
Gen: -ən
Dat: -ən
(3)
Nom: -
Acc: -(ə)
Gen: -ə
Dat: -ə
And it seems like a lot of the nouns in the third category ended up reassigned to the other two (because if you have some pattern of inflection, it seems like a lot of languages will assign "mostly doesn't inflect" into an inflectional rule, rather than the other way around), which is then probably where a lot of the "(kind of) uninflected nouns" like sunnu and giefu ended up
The plurals seem to follow a similar pattern:
(1)
Nom: -əs
Acc: -əs
Gen: -ə
Dat: -ən
(2)
Pl: -ən
(3)
Nom: -ə
Acc: -ə
Gen: -ə
Dat: -ən
Again, because a lot of the nouns in the singular third category got reassigned, the (3) pattern plurals would have eventually dropped out. This leaves the following:
(1)
SG.
Nom: -
Acc: -
Gen: -əs
Dative:-ə
PL.
Nom: -əs
Acc: -əs
Gen: -ə
Dat: -ən
(2)
SG.
Nom: -ə
Acc: -ən
Gen: -ən
Dat: -ən
PL.
_: -ən
Which is pretty much exactly what the Wikipedia article on Middle English Grammar gives for nouns, with the exception that the Class 1 Dative Plural sometimes ends is "s" rather than "n"
A similar result falls out when you take Old English weak verbs and reduce inflectional ending vowels to a schwa. The Middle English verbs, more or less, reflect their Old English counterparts, and exceptions get caught up in the results
Given this trend, and a general trend in at least North-Western Europe for unstressed vowels to be reduced, to what extent can Middle English really be considered "simplified" by the presence of non-native Old English speakers in the later decades of the 1st millennium CE??
For example, if you assume that all vowels in inflectional endings in Old English nouns reduce to a schwa, and, where two schwas appear in adjacent syllables, the second schwa drops out, you more or less end up with three patterns in the singular:
(1)
Nom: -
Acc: -
Gen: -əs
Dative:-ə
(2)
Nom: -ə
Acc: -ən
Gen: -ən
Dat: -ən
(3)
Nom: -
Acc: -(ə)
Gen: -ə
Dat: -ə
And it seems like a lot of the nouns in the third category ended up reassigned to the other two (because if you have some pattern of inflection, it seems like a lot of languages will assign "mostly doesn't inflect" into an inflectional rule, rather than the other way around), which is then probably where a lot of the "(kind of) uninflected nouns" like sunnu and giefu ended up
The plurals seem to follow a similar pattern:
(1)
Nom: -əs
Acc: -əs
Gen: -ə
Dat: -ən
(2)
Pl: -ən
(3)
Nom: -ə
Acc: -ə
Gen: -ə
Dat: -ən
Again, because a lot of the nouns in the singular third category got reassigned, the (3) pattern plurals would have eventually dropped out. This leaves the following:
(1)
SG.
Nom: -
Acc: -
Gen: -əs
Dative:-ə
PL.
Nom: -əs
Acc: -əs
Gen: -ə
Dat: -ən
(2)
SG.
Nom: -ə
Acc: -ən
Gen: -ən
Dat: -ən
PL.
_: -ən
Which is pretty much exactly what the Wikipedia article on Middle English Grammar gives for nouns, with the exception that the Class 1 Dative Plural sometimes ends is "s" rather than "n"
A similar result falls out when you take Old English weak verbs and reduce inflectional ending vowels to a schwa. The Middle English verbs, more or less, reflect their Old English counterparts, and exceptions get caught up in the results
Given this trend, and a general trend in at least North-Western Europe for unstressed vowels to be reduced, to what extent can Middle English really be considered "simplified" by the presence of non-native Old English speakers in the later decades of the 1st millennium CE??
You can tell the same lie a thousand times,
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
Re: (L&N) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
I (think) the genitive plural being -(ə)nə could be a weird holdover. If you assume "Old English, but schwa" you get a lot nouns where the genitive plural seems almost "agglutinative" as -ən+ə, so in nouns where the genitive plural is just -ə, compared to a bunch where it's -ənə, you get this situation where the "Class 1 -ənə" is an instance of over generalisation, where nouns with a gen. pl. of "-ən" is just "these nouns are -ən in the plural regardless". It's an example of an irregular sound change that's explainable, I guess
You can tell the same lie a thousand times,
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
Re: (L&N) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Does anybody happen to know how Arabic dialects are stressed. There is a thead about Arabic dialects in the Teach&Share section but I didn't find the answer.
My meta-thread: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5760