If natlangs were conlangs

A forum for discussing linguistics or just languages in general.
User avatar
Arayaz
mayan
mayan
Posts: 2218
Joined: 07 Sep 2022 00:24

Re: If natlangs were conlangs

Post by Arayaz »

Mándinrùh wrote: 14 Mar 2025 13:25
VaptuantaDoi wrote: 14 Mar 2025 08:51 Yeah nah that is a very odd analysis. I'd say
/b d ɟʝ g/

With /b d ɟʝ g/ → [β~β̞ ð~ð̞ ʝ~j ɣ~ɰ] / V _ V
Yeah, everyone likes to say /b d g/, but in reality, in most dialects, <b d> have no such surface form. dejad de andar is /ðɜˈχað ðe anˈðaɾ/.
I was pretty sure the author of Spanish had said the fricative realizations were restricted to certain environments, and insisted that /b d ɡ/ were the phonemes?
hayikesk h Hatsune Miku hïvakïtasęmayes · my thread · sep 6 gang ftw · i use she/her ^^
User avatar
Mándinrùh
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 197
Joined: 21 Aug 2016 20:37
Location: New England

Re: If natlangs were conlangs

Post by Mándinrùh »

Arayaz wrote: 14 Mar 2025 15:28 I was pretty sure the author of Spanish had said the fricative realizations were restricted to certain environments, and insisted that /b d ɡ/ were the phonemes?
Ah, yeah, they said that, but that's not how they actually pronounce it in the example recordings.
Creator of Image Atili
My website | My blog
HolyHandGrenade!
greek
greek
Posts: 731
Joined: 29 Aug 2024 17:27

Re: If natlangs were conlangs

Post by HolyHandGrenade! »

WeepingElf wrote: 14 Mar 2025 13:33 What this entire thread shows is that natlangs are often messy in ways we conlangers would consider bad design [;)]
Any “bad design” is a good design if justified by reasonable diachronic changes
:usa: :sco: :esp:
User avatar
VaptuantaDoi
roman
roman
Posts: 1357
Joined: 18 Nov 2019 07:35

Re: If natlangs were conlangs

Post by VaptuantaDoi »

Mándinrùh wrote: 14 Mar 2025 13:25
VaptuantaDoi wrote: 14 Mar 2025 08:51 Yeah nah that is a very odd analysis. I'd say
/b d ɟʝ g/

With /b d ɟʝ g/ → [β~β̞ ð~ð̞ ʝ~j ɣ~ɰ] / V _ V
Yeah, everyone likes to say /b d g/, but in reality, in most dialects, <b d> have no such surface form. dejad de andar is /ðɜˈχað ðe anˈðaɾ/.
I'm sorry but I just don't believe you [:(]
User avatar
Omzinesý
mongolian
mongolian
Posts: 4405
Joined: 27 Aug 2010 08:17
Location: nowhere [naʊhɪɚ]

Re: If natlangs were conlangs

Post by Omzinesý »

YoungConlanger wrote: 05 Dec 2024 17:23 What I hate about the conlang is that they artificially made /ɨ/ a phoneme. I bet they intended to have /ɨ/ as a phoneme, since Kirillitsa - the Russian script - has a separate glyph for it. I think something went not as planned while they were developing the sound changes from Old Russian to Russian, & then they basically were like "/ɨ/ isn't phonemic because /i/ always comes after soft consonants & /ɨ/ always after hard consonants, but wait /ɨ/ is actually phonemic because aparrently it comes word-initially in some rare loan names, & since both /i/ & /ɨ/ unconditionally appear in the same environment /ɨ/ is a phoneme". The names given sound unnatural even in the conlangs they're "borrowed" from. It's so artificial! I would've been more fine if you just said like "the glyph for the sound [ɨ] remains 'cause historical spelling"!
Usually conlangers just design a phoneme inventory at first. I think they also decided that /ɨ/ is a phoneme in the beginning. Then they wanted to preserve palatalization/velarization and ended up always using ɨ after hard consonants. When they realized the opposition between i and ɨ is going to be allophic, they just forced it be phonemic because they had already fallen in love with the table of vowel phonemes. Because conlangs always have thousands of words that just don't appear anywhere and are waiting for being found up, they just though that they will find up the words later but forgot, and thus the opposition is that weak.
My meta-thread: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5760
User avatar
YoungConlanger
sinic
sinic
Posts: 228
Joined: 23 Sep 2023 13:18
Contact:

Re: If natlangs were conlangs

Post by YoungConlanger »

Omzinesý wrote: 18 Mar 2025 09:49 (...) Because conlangs always have thousands of words that just don't appear anywhere and are waiting for being found up, they just though[t] that they will find up the words later but forgot, and thus the opposition is that weak.
Of course they forgot. All their memory went into creation of the Russian's brain-melting vowel reduction system & all the baroque sound changes that lead to it.
◀▌𐤉𐤍𐤂 𐤊𐤍𐤋𐤍𐤂𐤓 █ Young Conlanger is here, asking dumb questions again...▐▶
He/him. Currently screwing w/ Proto-Pehian & some drafts I don't wanna talk about yet.
28.04.2025
User avatar
Arayaz
mayan
mayan
Posts: 2218
Joined: 07 Sep 2022 00:24

Re: If natlangs were conlangs

Post by Arayaz »

/uj I wonder what the inverse thread, "if conlangs were natlangs" would look like.
hayikesk h Hatsune Miku hïvakïtasęmayes · my thread · sep 6 gang ftw · i use she/her ^^
sideways
rupestrian
rupestrian
Posts: 16
Joined: 02 Mar 2025 00:45

Re: If natlangs were conlangs

Post by sideways »

Hungarian: apparently the creator of this Uralic conlang hates ŋ so much that in the process of getting rid of it they came up with the ridiculous sound law *ŋt>ld, presumably forgetting that their reflexes of *nt and *mt are just d.
H. H. P. M. P. Cole
hieroglyphic
hieroglyphic
Posts: 41
Joined: 03 Jan 2025 11:13

Re: If natlangs were conlangs

Post by H. H. P. M. P. Cole »

https://linguifex.com/w/index.php?title ... did=447027

I should put all your ideas in this page

(To let you know, in this conworld Tricin, Earth is apparently a conworld created by someone who has too much time on his hands.)
Semi-expert in creating horrid vowel inventories, hyperminimalistic and hypermaximalistic phonologies, and mathematical conlangs.

:gbr: [:D] | :deu: [:x] | :chn: [:x] | :con: Riemannic, Wug Nlab
User avatar
Creyeditor
MVP
MVP
Posts: 5423
Joined: 14 Aug 2012 19:32
Contact:

Re: If natlangs were conlangs

Post by Creyeditor »

H. H. P. M. P. Cole wrote: 09 Apr 2025 12:06
(To let you know, in this conworld Tricin, Earth is apparently a conworld created by someone who has too much time on his hands.)
Pterry's roundworld vibes [:D]
Creyeditor
https://sites.google.com/site/creyeditor/
Produce, Analyze, Manipulate
1 :deu: 2 :eng: 3 :idn: 4 :fra: 4 :esp:
:con: Omlűt & :con: Kobardon & Fredauon Fun Facts & AMA on Indonesian
[<3] Papuan languages, Morphophonology, Lexical Semantics [<3]
User avatar
Shemtov
runic
runic
Posts: 3281
Joined: 29 Apr 2013 04:06

Re: If natlangs were conlangs

Post by Shemtov »

H. H. P. M. P. Cole wrote: 09 Apr 2025 12:06 https://linguifex.com/w/index.php?title ... did=447027

I should put all your ideas in this page

(To let you know, in this conworld Tricin, Earth is apparently a conworld created by someone who has too much time on his hands.)
On which Tricin is apparently a conworld created by someone who has too much time on his hands, and so on, meta ad infinitum?
Many children make up, or begin to make up, imaginary languages. I have been at it since I could write.
-JRR Tolkien
User avatar
Mándinrùh
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 197
Joined: 21 Aug 2016 20:37
Location: New England

Re: If natlangs were conlangs

Post by Mándinrùh »

The inventor of Catalan needs to stop being afraid of suffixes. You don't need to write "portar-nos-los-hi" ("to bring them to us there")— your speakers are smart people who can figure out where the suffixes are without the hyphens. On the other hand, the fact that the imperative of portar-nos-los-hi is porta'ns-els-hi is quite something.
Creator of Image Atili
My website | My blog
Post Reply