Euriziano a new european conlang

[Khemehekis]

Let me clarify my stance on artificial international auxiliary languages (auxlangs). Making an auxlang is a legitimate intellectual pursuit; indeed, I have laid down my ideas how I'd design one, and maybe I'll make a "case study auxlang" based on these ideas one day.

Closed vocabulary schemes are not easier to learn than natural languages, which always have open (i.e., extensible) vocabularies: you have to learn thousands of circumlocutions instead. They merely make language usage more clumsy. The large and indeterminate size of natural languages is not a bug, but a feature. Reality is too complex to break down into a few hundred "basic concepts".

"Not a bug, but a feature". That's what I say about why Vötgil gets it all wrong.

Euriziano is at no risk of falling into the Vötgil trap here -- Latin had a vocabulary of 45,000 words to choose from, while Esperanto has 77,000.

[Zé do Rock]

Si, el idee non è super original, ma nad è super original oi dia. Pra obtener 1% du suxeso de Esperanto, algi averie ke estar super ric et haver multa carisma, o haver amigis kin è super ric et ha carisma...

E yo acorda ke esperanto non è la meyor fonte pra palavras moderna: ki comprende retposhto o furorlibro, si tuti diz e-mail e best-seller, meme la parloris de linguas latin?

Osie yo inventou un conlang latine, panlatino - solo pra divertu: ma yo no deriva la palavras du latinum, e si du linguas latina moderna: yo pensa ke multi fransis o portugalis (et otri europis ki parla linguas latina) no sabai lo ke significa 'albi', 'pulchri', 'dorcade', ja ke lis di 'blanco', 'belo', 'gazela'...

Clar: ki ama la formas du latinum ma pensa ke è trop efort aprender lu, pod aprender eurizian...