Some thoughts on the evolution of planetary systems

Discussions about constructed worlds, cultures and any topics related to constructed societies.
Post Reply
User avatar
WeepingElf
greek
greek
Posts: 640
Joined: 23 Feb 2016 18:42
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Contact:

Some thoughts on the evolution of planetary systems

Post by WeepingElf »

I wish to discuss some thoughts on the evolution of planetary systems here.

As you know, there are planetary systems that are unlike ours: "hot Jupiters", "super-Earths" and the like. Indeed, there are more of those known than systems like our solar system, because they are easier to detect (the bigger a planet is and the shorter its orbital period, the easier it is to detect; of our planets, the terrestrial ones would be hard to find because they are so small, and the giants because their orbital periods are so long). Why did those "freaks" evolve?

It is now understood that giant planets evolve rather swiftly, and influence the formation of the terrestrial planets. According to the Grand Tack model, Jupiter migrated inward, bringing the accretion of the terrestrial planets (especially Mars) to a halt, before Saturn pulled it back outward, thus preventing Jupiter from becoming a "hot Jupiter" and saving the day for the terrestrial planets.

My idea is that: 1. "Hot Jupiters" form when there is no "Saturn" to pull the "Jupiter" back, and the "Jupiter" thus moves inward into a very close orbit, thereby obliterating any terrestrial planets. 2. "Super-Earths" form when there is no giant migrating to put a check on their growth, perhaps because the giants have thrown each other out of the system.

What do you think about this? Does it make sense to you?
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf
My conlang pages
Keenir
runic
runic
Posts: 2504
Joined: 22 May 2012 03:05

Re: Some thoughts on the evolution of planetary systems

Post by Keenir »

WeepingElf wrote: 04 Nov 2024 21:11 I wish to discuss some thoughts on the evolution of planetary systems here.

It is now understood that giant planets evolve rather swiftly, and influence the formation of the terrestrial planets. According to the Grand Tack model, Jupiter migrated inward, bringing the accretion of the terrestrial planets (especially Mars) to a halt, before Saturn pulled it back outward, thus preventing Jupiter from becoming a "hot Jupiter" and saving the day for the terrestrial planets.
on the other hand, at least then Europa wouldn't've had to wait for the Monolith's ignition for its ice to melt. :)

seriously, excellent points.
My idea is that: 1. "Hot Jupiters" form when there is no "Saturn" to pull the "Jupiter" back, and the "Jupiter" thus moves inward into a very close orbit, thereby obliterating any terrestrial planets. 2. "Super-Earths" form when there is no giant migrating to put a check on their growth, perhaps because the giants have thrown each other out of the system.

What do you think about this? Does it make sense to you?
Makes a lot of sense.

I've seen suggestions that Mars' and Ceres' growth were capped by the existance of Jupiter nearby...the program didn't even mention the Grand Tack, though I suspect the Grand Tack thwarted further growth a lot more than the mere existing of Jupiter did.
At work on Apaan: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=4799
Khemehekis
mongolian
mongolian
Posts: 4408
Joined: 14 Aug 2010 09:36
Location: California über alles

Re: Some thoughts on the evolution of planetary systems

Post by Khemehekis »

Keenir wrote: 04 Nov 2024 22:09 on the other hand, at least then Europa wouldn't've had to wait for the Monolith's ignition for its ice to melt. :)
I wonder if the Monolith in the movie got its name from . . . well, what are the German/Yiddish words for "one" and "stone"?
♂♥♂♀

Squirrels chase koi . . . chase squirrels

My Kankonian-English dictionary: Now at 103,000 words!

31,416: The number of the conlanging beast!
User avatar
Man in Space
roman
roman
Posts: 1387
Joined: 03 Aug 2012 08:07
Location: Ohio

Re: Some thoughts on the evolution of planetary systems

Post by Man in Space »

Khemehekis wrote: 04 Nov 2024 22:58
Keenir wrote: 04 Nov 2024 22:09 on the other hand, at least then Europa wouldn't've had to wait for the Monolith's ignition for its ice to melt. :)
I wonder if the Monolith in the movie got its name from . . . well, what are the German/Yiddish words for "one" and "stone"?
Is it not TMA-1 like in the books?
Twin Aster megathread

AVDIO · VIDEO · DISCO

CC = Common Caber
CK = Classical Khaya
CT = Classical Ĝare n Tim Ar
Kg = Kgáweq'
PB = Proto-Beheic
PO = Proto-O
PTa = Proto-Taltic
STK = Sisỏk Tlar Kyanà
Tm = Təmattwəspwaypksma
Keenir
runic
runic
Posts: 2504
Joined: 22 May 2012 03:05

Re: Some thoughts on the evolution of planetary systems

Post by Keenir »

Khemehekis wrote: 04 Nov 2024 22:58
Keenir wrote: 04 Nov 2024 22:09 on the other hand, at least then Europa wouldn't've had to wait for the Monolith's ignition for its ice to melt. :)
I wonder if the Monolith in the movie got its name from . . . well, what are the German/Yiddish words for "one" and "stone"?
I think German is "Einstein"...I presume Yiddish is similar; yes?
At work on Apaan: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=4799
Khemehekis
mongolian
mongolian
Posts: 4408
Joined: 14 Aug 2010 09:36
Location: California über alles

Re: Some thoughts on the evolution of planetary systems

Post by Khemehekis »

Keenir wrote: 05 Nov 2024 21:51
Khemehekis wrote: 04 Nov 2024 22:58
Keenir wrote: 04 Nov 2024 22:09 on the other hand, at least then Europa wouldn't've had to wait for the Monolith's ignition for its ice to melt. :)
I wonder if the Monolith in the movie got its name from . . . well, what are the German/Yiddish words for "one" and "stone"?
I think German is "Einstein"...I presume Yiddish is similar; yes?
Yep!

One day back in 2003 or 2004, I was trying to translate "monolithic corporate culture" into German. I turned "mono" and "lith" into "ein" and "stein", and, upon realizing I got "Einstein", thought, "Holy crap! So that's the subtext behind the name 'Monolith' in that SF movie?!"
♂♥♂♀

Squirrels chase koi . . . chase squirrels

My Kankonian-English dictionary: Now at 103,000 words!

31,416: The number of the conlanging beast!
Post Reply