Finally, my conlang sketch is fleshed out... (Okay, I cheated. Most of the lexicon is based off another conlang.)
https://linguifex.com/wiki/Wug_Nlab
Feel free to ask any questions and give comments, because my conlanging skills are not very good...
Wug Nlab - a horrible derivative conlang
-
- hieroglyphic
- Posts: 30
- Joined: 03 Jan 2025 11:13
Wug Nlab - a horrible derivative conlang
Semi-expert in creating horrid vowel inventories, hyperminimalistic and hypermaximalistic phonologies, and mathematical conlangs.
|
|
Riemannic, Wug Nlab

![:D [:D]](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin2.png)

![:x [:x]](./images/smilies/icon_shamesz.png)

Re: Wug Nlab - a horrible derivative conlang
why is it terrible...
how is it loglang...
how is it loglang...
-
- hieroglyphic
- Posts: 30
- Joined: 03 Jan 2025 11:13
Re: Wug Nlab - a horrible derivative conlang
I ahem, ahem improved the documentation - feel free to peruse it. The most important sections are this section and those below it.
(I might be misusing the term loglang here, AFAIK it has to have a logical system of grammar)
Nevertheless, the conlang stemmed from a simple thought experiment of mine, and I feel it works.
It was terrible because I couldn't come up with a better highly mathematical/logical system of grammar, and I broke my brain over it
![:3 [:3]](./images/smilies/icon_3.png)
Nevertheless, the conlang stemmed from a simple thought experiment of mine, and I feel it works.
Semi-expert in creating horrid vowel inventories, hyperminimalistic and hypermaximalistic phonologies, and mathematical conlangs.
|
|
Riemannic, Wug Nlab

![:D [:D]](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin2.png)

![:x [:x]](./images/smilies/icon_shamesz.png)

Re: Wug Nlab - a horrible derivative conlang
You can base your conlang on lambda calculus, with a few predefined functions as basic words and abstractions as a some kind of derivation.H. H. P. M. P. Cole wrote: ↑09 Jan 2025 11:06 It was terrible because I couldn't come up with a better highly mathematical/logical system of grammar, and I broke my brain over it(I might be misusing the term loglang here, AFAIK it has to have a logical system of grammar)